Brandon Mysliwiec Contact
PrecisePepResearch Library

Research information only. PrecisePep is an educational library. It is not medical advice and is not intended to assist, encourage or enable self-administration. The compounds documented here are research chemicals — most are not approved for human use. Read the full disclaimer.

Research index

By condition

Every monograph in this library is organised by compound. This page inverts that: it is organised by condition, because that is how the question usually arrives — someone has a diagnosis, and wants to know what the peptide literature says about it.

The answer is frequently less than the internet implies. Most entries below are tagged Theorized or Anecdotal, which means mechanism and forum reports respectively — not evidence that anything works in a person with that condition. Where a compound does have real human trial data, it is tagged Study and the trial is named.

Each condition also carries a what actually has evidence panel. Read it. In most of these conditions the established treatment is cheaper, better studied, and better supervised than anything on this page, and the honest version of a peptide reference says so.

Read this before anything below it

This page is not medical advice, a diagnosis, a treatment plan, or a suggestion that any compound listed here should be used for any condition named here. It is a research index. Nothing on this page is intended to assist with self-administration, and a condition appearing in the same row as a compound is not a claim that the compound treats it.

Almost everything listed is not approved for the condition it appears under. Several are not approved for anything, anywhere. Human data on the specific pairing usually does not exist, and where it does it is usually small, short and unreplicated. A named condition means people are researching or discussing that pairing — nothing more.

If you have any condition on this page, it is a condition that warrants a clinician. Several of them — diabetes, heart failure, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic kidney disease — can be made substantially worse by an unsupervised intervention, including by one that is otherwise harmless, simply through delaying or displacing treatment that works.

117 conditions across 9 categories. Every compound named links to its monograph, where the dosing, adverse effects and sources live.

Cards open on click. Anchored links open their card automatically.

Group 01

Metabolic & endocrine

The only area of this library where approved peptide drugs, outcome trials and grey-market interest all point at the same molecules. It is also where the gap between the approved product and the vial is most consequential, because these compounds interact with insulin.

Type 2 diabetes

Insulin resistance plus progressive beta-cell failure. The incretin class did not just lower glucose — it lowered cardiovascular and renal events, which is why it displaced older agents rather than joining them.

13 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Approved. SUSTAIN established the glycaemic effect; SUSTAIN-6 reported reduced major adverse cardiovascular events; FLOW reported renal benefit in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Approved. Dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist; the SURPASS programme produced the largest HbA1c reductions of any injectable in the class, and beat semaglutide 1 mg head-to-head.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Approved. The LEAD programme for glycaemia, LEADER for cardiovascular outcomes. Daily dosing makes it easier to titrate and easier to stop than the weekly agents.

  • Dulaglutide Study

    Approved. REWIND is notable for enrolling a largely primary-prevention population — most participants had no established cardiovascular disease.

  • Exenatide Study

    Approved; the original GLP-1 agonist. Contraindicated below eGFR 30, which is unusual in the class and matters in the population most likely to need it.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    The oldest peptide drug there is, and the one this site explicitly does not publish community dosing for. Dosing errors here are lethal on a timescale of hours.

  • Pramlintide Study

    Approved as an adjunct to mealtime insulin. Carries a boxed warning for severe insulin-induced hypoglycaemia and requires prandial insulin to be halved when started.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Phase 2 reported roughly 2 points of HbA1c reduction. No phase 3 readout, no approved product, no validated titration — in a condition with two approved alternatives carrying outcome data.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    No standalone diabetes programme. Its evidence in this condition exists only as half of CagriSema.

  • CagriSema Study

    REDEFINE-2 studied the fixed combination in type 2 diabetes with obesity. The result belongs to the trialled ratio, co-escalated — not to two vials assembled at home.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Mitochondrial-derived peptide that improves insulin sensitivity in rodents via AMPK. No human trial in diabetes.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Associated with insulin sensitivity in observational and animal work. No human trial in diabetes.

  • 5-Amino-1MQ Theorized

    NNMT inhibition improves metabolic parameters in obese mice. No human data of any kind.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Metformin remains first-line and costs almost nothing. SGLT2 inhibitors carry their own cardiovascular and renal outcome data and are frequently the better second agent. GLP-1 agonists are added for established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or when weight is central. Structured education, sleep, resistance training and dietary change all alter the trajectory of the disease and compound with every drug above — they are not the polite preamble to pharmacotherapy.

The specific grey-market hazard here is not the peptide, it is the combination. These agents lower glucose hard enough that a background insulin or sulphonylurea regimen usually needs reducing. Nobody performs that reduction for someone dosing from a research vial.

Type 1 diabetes

Autoimmune destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells, requiring lifelong insulin replacement. This is the condition where a peptide is not a candidate for anything — it is the entire treatment, and has been since 1922. It is the proof that the model works, which is also why it is worth being hard on everything that borrows its glamour.

8 compounds documented
  • Insulin & analogues Study

    The treatment, and the reason peptide therapeutics exist as a field. Not a supplement, not optional, and not something to adjust on the basis of anything read online. Every other entry on this site is measured against what a peptide looks like when it genuinely replaces a missing signal.

  • Pramlintide Study

    The second approved peptide here. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin and is therefore also deficient in type 1 diabetes — pramlintide replaces it, slowing gastric emptying and suppressing glucagon, approved as an adjunct to mealtime insulin. It carries a boxed warning for severe hypoglycaemia, and mealtime insulin must be reduced when it is started.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Tested properly, and the answer was no. The ADJUNCT ONE trial randomised 1,398 people with type 1 diabetes to liraglutide or placebo alongside insulin for 52 weeks. HbA1c fell by around half a percentage point and weight fell by up to 4.9 kg — alongside increased symptomatic hypoglycaemia and increased hyperglycaemia with ketosis. The benefits were real and the safety signal is why it is not approved for this indication.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Used off-label in type 1 diabetes, particularly where obesity coexists, and not approved for it. The ADJUNCT result above is the class evidence, and ketosis risk in someone with no endogenous insulin reserve is a different order of problem than it is in type 2. This is a specialist decision with sick-day rules attached, not a self-directed one.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same position, same caution, less type 1 data.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune enhancement in an autoimmune disease. The direction problem, and the field is moving decisively the other way — see below.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed for the vascular and neuropathic complications. No evidence, and complication prevention is achieved by glycaemic control, blood pressure and lipid management.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial framing applied to diabetic complications. Untested here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Insulin plus technology is the treatment, and the technology has changed the disease. Continuous glucose monitoring, and automated insulin delivery systems that close the loop between sensor and pump, have improved time-in-range and reduced hypoglycaemia to a degree that no drug achieved. Access to them, rather than any pharmacological question, is the dominant issue in outcomes.

And for the first time, the disease can be delayed before it arrives. Teplizumab — an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, marketed as Tzield in the US — is approved to delay the onset of stage 3 type 1 diabetes in people with stage 2 disease: autoantibody-positive with dysglycaemia but not yet symptomatic. The pivotal TN-10 trial randomised 76 participants to a single 14-day course or placebo; 45% of treated participants progressed to clinical diabetes against 72% on placebo, a median delay of roughly two years. The indication has since been extended to children as young as one, and it was approved in the EU in January 2026. Note the pattern: it is given once, before the disease presents, and it buys time rather than preventing it. Screening for islet autoantibodies in relatives is what makes it usable at all.

The third approved peptide here is the emergency one: glucagon, the counter-regulatory hormone, for severe hypoglycaemia — now available as a nasal powder and as pre-filled autoinjectors, which removed the reconstitution step that made the old kits close to unusable by a frightened bystander. Anyone on insulin should have one, and someone around them should know where it is.

Beyond that: structured education, carbohydrate counting, sick-day rules and ketone testing, and annual screening for retinopathy, kidney disease and neuropathy. Diabetic ketoacidosis is the acute emergency, and it is why anything that alters gastric emptying or appetite in this population is a supervised decision.

Beta cell replacement is real now rather than aspirational — islet transplantation is established in selected patients, and stem-cell-derived islet therapies have produced insulin independence in early trials. The limiting factor is immunosuppression, not the cells.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Insulin, pramlintide and glucagon are approved peptides. Teplizumab is an antibody, and it delays the disease rather than treating it.

Obesity & weight regulation

Physiologically defended: energy restriction lowers metabolic rate and raises hunger signalling, which is why most weight loss reverses. The incretins work by acting on that defence rather than against it.

12 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Approved at 2.4 mg weekly (Wegovy). SELECT reported cardiovascular event reduction in people with obesity and established cardiovascular disease but without diabetes.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Approved (Zepbound). SURMOUNT produced the largest weight reductions of any approved agent to date.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Approved at 3.0 mg daily (Saxenda) on the SCALE programme. Largely displaced by weekly agents on efficacy, not on failure.

  • Retatrutide Study

    The largest weight effect demonstrated by any pharmacological agent: 28.3% at 80 weeks and 30.3% at 104 weeks in the TRIUMPH phase 3 programme, with 45.3% of the top-dose arm losing at least 30% of body weight. Not yet approved — a licence application is planned for early 2027 — and the programme did not include a cardiovascular outcome trial.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Amylin analogue, investigational, studied as a dose-sparing partner rather than alone.

  • Retatrutide + Cagrilintide Anecdotal

    A community stack, not a trialled product. The ratio is vendor-dependent and the combination has never been studied as assembled.

  • CagriSema Study

    The one amylin-plus-incretin combination with actual trial data. REDEFINE-1 landed below market expectation, which is itself informative.

  • AOD-9604 Theorized

    A growth-hormone fragment marketed on a fat-loss rationale. The human trials that were run did not separate it from placebo on weight.

  • Tesofensine Study

    A triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor with genuine phase 2 weight-loss data — and a blood-pressure and heart-rate signal that stalled its development.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    Approved specifically for HIV-associated visceral fat, not general obesity. The distinction is the whole point.

  • Peptide YY (PYY) Theorized

    A real satiety signal with a failed clinical programme — the intranasal formulation could not separate the effect from nausea.

  • SLU-PP-332 Theorized

    An ERR agonist described as an "exercise mimetic" in mice. No human data by any route.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Sustained weight change is produced by an energy deficit that a person can actually maintain, and the pharmacology above works by making that deficit tolerable rather than by replacing it. Resistance training preserves lean mass during the deficit — significant, because a meaningful fraction of incretin-driven weight loss is lean tissue. Protein intake, sleep and treatment of untreated obstructive sleep apnoea all move the same needle. Bariatric surgery still produces the largest and most durable results and remains under-referred.

PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome)

The most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, and one of the most misunderstood. Insulin resistance drives hyperinsulinaemia; hyperinsulinaemia drives ovarian androgen production and suppresses SHBG, raising free testosterone. Interventions that improve insulin sensitivity unwind that loop from both ends — which is why a metabolic drug treats a reproductive condition.

11 compounds documented
  • Liraglutide Study

    The most randomised PCOS evidence of any agent in the class — small, short trials reporting weight, insulin sensitivity and menstrual regularity, often against or alongside metformin. It is also now available as a generic for both its indications, which matters in a condition that needs long-term management.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Randomised off-label evidence in PCOS, plus the largest weight effect of the approved weekly agents — and oral semaglutide is now approved for weight management, which removes the injection from the equation.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Mechanistically the strongest candidate; PCOS-specific randomised data is thinnest in the class because it is newest. Note the labelled reduction in oral contraceptive effectiveness — backup or non-oral contraception is advised for four weeks after starting and after each dose increase, which matters enormously in a population being told their fertility may return.

  • Orforglipron Theorized

    Same receptor, oral, no injection and no cold chain. No PCOS data, and the practical profile suits a chronic condition in a young population.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    AMPK activation and improved insulin sensitivity in animal models — the same pathway metformin works through, with none of metformin’s six decades of evidence.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is documented in PCOS granulosa cells and is implicated in oocyte quality, which makes the anti-apoptotic rationale specific rather than generic. It remains cell-level.

  • AOD-9604 Theorized

    Discussed on a weight-loss rationale its own human trials did not support, and rejected 0–12 by the PCAC.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    The mechanism transfers from the approved agents and the phase 3 weight data is now substantial. There is still no PCOS trial and no approval.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Route to benefit runs entirely through weight, which is a longer path than the incretin case.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Genuinely interesting here rather than incidental: PCOS involves disordered GnRH pulse frequency favouring LH over FSH, and kisspeptin sits directly upstream of that pulse generator. Research-setting only, and stimulating an already dysregulated axis is not obviously the right direction.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Discussed for the inflammatory and skin components rather than the endocrine core. No PCOS data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Treat the phenotype in front of you, not the label. PCOS is diagnosed on the Rotterdam criteria — two of three from hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction and polycystic ovarian morphology — which means two people with the same diagnosis can need entirely different treatment. Polycystic ovaries on ultrasound alone are not PCOS, and the scan is not required if the other two criteria are met.

By goal: metformin for the metabolic phenotype; combined hormonal contraceptives for hyperandrogenism and cycle regulation; letrozole first-line for ovulation induction, ahead of clomifene; spironolactone for hirsutism, with contraception because of teratogenicity; inositol with reasonable evidence and a benign safety profile. A 5–10% weight reduction alone restores ovulation in a meaningful proportion of people.

The risk that gets missed: chronic anovulation means the endometrium sees oestrogen without the progesterone that normally opposes it, and unopposed oestrogen over years raises endometrial hyperplasia and cancer risk. That is the reason cycle regulation matters even for someone not seeking pregnancy and not troubled by irregular periods — and it is routinely left out of the conversation. Persistently absent periods warrant a plan, not just reassurance.

The consequence nobody plans for: these interventions restore fertility. Conception becomes possible, often in someone who stopped using contraception years earlier because they believed it was not. The incretin class is contraindicated in pregnancy and must be stopped in advance.

Longer term, PCOS carries elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, dyslipidaemia, obstructive sleep apnoea, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and depression and anxiety at rates well above the background population. Screening for those is part of the condition’s management rather than an optional extra.

Hypothyroidism

An underactive thyroid, whatever the cause, replaced with levothyroxine. Nothing in this library treats it — but several compounds interact with the drug that does, and that interaction is the reason this entry exists. For the autoimmune process that causes most cases in iodine-sufficient countries, see Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

7 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immunomodulation is the only plausible route to affecting the autoimmune process itself. It has never been studied in Hashimoto's, and shifting immune balance in an active autoimmune condition can go either way.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Discussed for the gut-autoimmunity axis. Note that coeliac disease and atrophic gastritis genuinely do impair levothyroxine absorption, and both are more common in Hashimoto's.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Relevant for the interaction, not the treatment: delayed gastric emptying alters absorption of a narrow-therapeutic-index, fasting-dependent drug. A thyroid drift after starting an incretin is often an absorption change, not a thyroid change.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same interaction, and the class boxed warning for thyroid C-cell tumours makes the pairing with thyroid disease worth understanding properly rather than dismissing.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Slows gastric emptying independently of any incretin — in a stack, two compounds are doing it at once.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH secretagogues alter deiodinase activity and peripheral T4-to-T3 conversion, which can move thyroid labs without any change in thyroid function.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Pineal-axis claims are extrapolated toward the thyroid axis in community writing. There is no human thyroid data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Levothyroxine is inexpensive, once daily, titrated against a reliable blood test, and restores euthyroid status in most people. The unglamorous first move in someone still symptomatic is confirming replacement is adequate and correctly taken — fasting, and away from calcium, iron, coffee and proton pump inhibitors. Selenium has modest evidence for lowering thyroid antibody titres without clearly changing outcomes. Screening for coeliac disease is reasonable given the association.

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

Autoimmune destruction of the thyroid gland, and the commonest cause of hypothyroidism in iodine-sufficient countries. The distinction that matters: the hormone deficiency is fully treatable and the autoimmune process is not treated at all. Almost everything sold into this space is aimed at the second thing.

6 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immunomodulation is the only plausible route to the autoimmune process itself, which is exactly why it appears here — and the direction problem applies with full force. Every approved use of this compound depends on enhancing immune response. It has never been studied in Hashimoto’s.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Discussed for the gut-autoimmunity axis. The defensible version is narrower and genuinely useful: coeliac disease and atrophic gastritis are both more common in Hashimoto’s and both impair levothyroxine absorption. Investigating that is worthwhile; this compound is not the way to do it.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in autoimmunity broadly. As in lupus and psoriasis, that places it on the wrong side of the mechanism.

  • KPV Theorized

    Generic anti-inflammatory action. Thyroid autoimmunity is antibody- and T-cell-mediated, not a generic inflammatory state.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Relevant for the interaction rather than the disease: delayed gastric emptying alters absorption of a narrow-therapeutic-index, fasting-dependent drug. A thyroid drift after starting an incretin is often an absorption change, not a thyroid change — and the fix is retesting and retitrating rather than assuming the disease progressed.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Pineal-axis claims extrapolated toward the thyroid axis in community writing. No human thyroid data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Nothing modifies the autoimmune process. Levothyroxine replaces the hormone the gland can no longer make, and does it well — inexpensive, once daily, titrated against a reliable blood test. The antibodies stay. Most people feel entirely normal on adequate replacement, and the first move in someone who does not is confirming the replacement is adequate and correctly taken: fasting, and separated from calcium, iron, coffee and proton pump inhibitors.

Selenium is the clearest case on this page of a biomarker moving without a patient moving. The CATALYST trial randomised 472 people with autoimmune thyroiditis to 200 µg of selenium-enriched yeast or placebo for twelve months. Thyroid peroxidase antibody titres fell. Quality of life did not improve. Selenium does what it is claimed to do to the number, and that turned out not to be the same as helping. It is worth holding on to as a template, because the antibody titre is precisely what gets used to sell interventions in this condition.

On the diets: screening for coeliac disease is reasonable given the association, and where coeliac is present a gluten-free diet is genuine treatment. In its absence, the evidence that removing gluten changes Hashimoto’s is weak. The same applies to the elimination protocols marketed for it.

On subclinical disease: a raised TSH with normal free T4 is not automatically a reason to treat. The TRUST trial randomised older adults with subclinical hypothyroidism to levothyroxine or placebo and found no benefit on symptoms or tiredness, and guidelines have narrowed the indication accordingly. Combination T4/T3 therapy remains contested; the trials have mostly not shown superiority, and a minority of patients report otherwise.

Also worth knowing: Hashimoto’s clusters with other autoimmune conditions — type 1 diabetes, coeliac disease, vitiligo, pernicious anaemia — and a new symptom in someone already diagnosed is sometimes a second condition rather than inadequate treatment of the first.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Levothyroxine treats the consequence. No approved therapy anywhere targets the autoimmunity.

Acromegaly & growth hormone excess

A pituitary adenoma secreting growth hormone continuously. Included deliberately: this is what the GH axis does when it is driven upward for years, and it is treated with a peptide that does the reverse of everything else in the growth-hormone section of this library.

4 compounds documented
  • Octreotide Study

    Approved. Suppresses GH and normalises IGF-1 in a substantial proportion of patients where surgery has not achieved remission. Available as a three-times-daily injection, a monthly depot, and an oral delayed-release capsule for maintenance.

  • Sermorelin Theorized

    Listed for contrast. Sermorelin, CJC-1295, ipamorelin and the GH blends all aim to raise the hormone that acromegaly is defined by having too much of.

  • CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    The DAC form produces continuous rather than pulsatile GHRH exposure, which is closer to the acromegaly pattern than to the physiological one. That is the whole argument for the no-DAC version.

  • Triple GH Blend Anecdotal

    Three secretagogues at once, in an axis whose pathological state is defined by sustained elevation. No trial has studied any three-compound GH stack.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Transsphenoidal surgery first where the adenoma is resectable, somatostatin analogues for persistent disease, the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant or the dopamine agonist cabergoline added where IGF-1 remains elevated, and radiotherapy in refractory cases. Treatment is titrated against IGF-1.

Why this section is here at all: acromegaly causes cardiomyopathy, hypertension, sleep apnoea, insulin resistance, arthropathy and increased colorectal neoplasia, and it shortens life. Nobody using a GH secretagogue is producing acromegaly — the doses and the duration are not comparable. But the direction is the same, and it is worth knowing what the far end of it looks like before assuming that more growth hormone is straightforwardly better.

Diabetes insipidus (arginine vasopressin deficiency)

Unrelated to diabetes mellitus beyond the shared symptom of passing large volumes of urine. The central form is a shortage of vasopressin; the nephrogenic form is a kidney that cannot respond to it. Distinguishing the two is the entire diagnostic question.

3 compounds documented
  • Desmopressin Study

    Approved replacement therapy for the central form — vasopressin re-engineered to keep the water effect and lose the blood-pressure effect. It does nothing for the nephrogenic form, where the problem is the kidney rather than the hormone.

  • Terlipressin Study

    The same hormone family built from the opposite half of its pharmacology — V1 vasoconstriction rather than V2 water retention. Not a diabetes insipidus treatment; listed because the contrast explains what desmopressin was designed to avoid.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    Differs from vasopressin at only two of nine positions and has meaningful antidiuretic cross-activity at higher doses, which is how prolonged oxytocin infusion causes water intoxication.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Desmopressin, in the central form, with dose and route individualised and serum sodium monitored. For the nephrogenic form the approach is entirely different: address the cause where possible — lithium, hypercalcaemia, hypokalaemia — and use thiazide diuretics, amiloride and a low-solute diet.

The failure mode to understand is hyponatraemia. A drug that makes the kidney retain water will dilute serum sodium in anyone who keeps drinking normally. Fluid restriction around dosing is part of the treatment, not advice attached to it.

Adrenal insufficiency & steroid withdrawal

Failure to produce enough cortisol. The commonest cause is not a disease at all — it is having taken corticosteroids, which suppresses the axis and leaves it unable to respond to stress. It is also the condition the wellness industry has most thoroughly muddled.

7 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    No role. Included because “adrenal support” products frequently appear alongside immune-support marketing aimed at the same fatigue complaint.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Sold squarely into the “adrenal fatigue” market, which is not a diagnosis — see below. Fatigue is a real symptom deserving a real explanation, and this is not one.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Endocrine-axis claims by association with the pineal gland. No adrenal data.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Appears in “HPA axis recovery” protocols. No human evidence.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Relevant for a genuine reason: GH replacement can unmask previously compensated adrenal insufficiency by increasing cortisol clearance, which is a documented interaction in hypopituitary patients. Anyone on both axes needs endocrine supervision, and this is one of the better arguments against self-directed GH-axis manipulation in someone with any pituitary history — see pituitary tumours.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    Two connections. Cortisol opposes insulin, so adrenal insufficiency lowers insulin requirements and raises hypoglycaemia risk. And the insulin tolerance test is a reference method for assessing the axis — performed only in specialist settings, for good reason.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    No direct role. Weight loss, reduced appetite and fatigue overlap with adrenal insufficiency symptoms, which is a reason to keep the differential open rather than attributing everything to the drug.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Say this plainly: “adrenal fatigue” is not a recognised medical diagnosis, and systematic reviews have not found evidence that it exists as described. Meanwhile adrenal insufficiency is real, is diagnosable with a straightforward blood test, and kills people who do not know they have it. The gap between those two sentences is where a large supplement industry operates, and its cost is not only money — it is the person with genuine Addison’s disease or genuine steroid-induced suppression who spends a year on adaptogens.

The most relevant cause for this readership is exogenous corticosteroid. Prolonged oral steroids suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis — but so can repeated joint injections, high-dose inhaled steroids, potent topical steroids over large areas, and courses that were only ever meant to be short. Recovery takes months and sometimes longer, and during that window the person cannot mount a cortisol response to illness, injury or surgery. Stopping steroids abruptly after a prolonged course is the classic precipitant. Tapering is not a formality.

Adrenal crisis is the emergency and it is what actually kills. Profound weakness, vomiting, abdominal pain, confusion, low blood pressure and collapse — typically triggered by an infection, injury or operation in someone whose axis cannot respond. Treatment is immediate hydrocortisone and fluids, and it should not wait for confirmatory testing. Anyone on long-term steroid replacement or at risk needs to know sick day rules — double the dose during febrile illness, injectable hydrocortisone available at home, and someone who knows how to give it — and should carry a steroid emergency card. This information saves lives and is routinely not given.

Primary adrenal insufficiency — Addison’s disease — is usually autoimmune, and characteristically causes skin darkening, salt craving and low sodium with high potassium; it clusters with other autoimmune conditions including Hashimoto’s and type 1 diabetes. Secondary insufficiency comes from the pituitary and does not cause pigmentation or the same electrolyte pattern. Diagnosis is a morning cortisol and a Synacthen test. Replacement is hydrocortisone, with fludrocortisone in primary disease. Cortisol must be replaced before thyroid hormone in combined deficiency, because getting that order wrong can precipitate a crisis.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone are steroids, not peptides. Synacthen — tetracosactide — is a synthetic ACTH fragment used diagnostically, and is the peptide in this story.

Metabolic syndrome, MASLD & fatty liver

Visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and hepatic fat accumulation as one connected process rather than four diagnoses.

9 compounds documented
  • Tesamorelin Study

    Randomised trials reported reduced visceral adipose tissue and reduced hepatic fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy — the clearest visceral-fat result of any compound here.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Trials in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis have reported steatohepatitis resolution; the fibrosis endpoint has been harder to move.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Reported reductions in liver fat in trial sub-studies, alongside the largest weight effect in the class.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    The glucagon arm is directly relevant to hepatic fat, and phase 2a work reported near-normalisation of liver fat at higher doses. The TRIUMPH phase 3 programme measured weight and glycaemia rather than liver endpoints, so this specific claim still rests on phase 2.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    AMPK activation, improved fatty-acid oxidation and reduced hepatic steatosis in mice.

  • 5-Amino-1MQ Theorized

    NNMT inhibition reduced fat mass in obese mice. Nothing in humans.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    NAD+ decline is well documented with age; that repletion by injection changes hepatic or metabolic outcomes in humans is not.

  • SLU-PP-332 Theorized

    ERR agonism increased fatty-acid oxidation and reduced adiposity in mice without exercise.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial cardiolipin stabilisation; relevant to the mitochondrial dysfunction component rather than the adiposity.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Weight loss of 7–10% produces steatohepatitis resolution in a substantial fraction of people and remains the single most effective intervention. Alcohol reduction, treatment of coexisting diabetes, and — as of the current label landscape — resmetirom for biopsy-confirmed steatohepatitis with fibrosis. Statins are safe in fatty liver and under-prescribed in it.

Fatty liver disease (MASLD & MASH)

Fat accumulation in the liver with metabolic dysfunction, which in a subset progresses to steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. As of August 2025 it is also an approved indication for a compound in this library — which makes it one of the very few pages here where the honest answer is that the drug people are already taking works.

12 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Approved for this, and the trial is worth knowing properly. The FDA approved semaglutide 2.4 mg for MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2–F3) in August 2025, on the ESSENCE phase 3 trial: at 72 weeks, 62.9% achieved steatohepatitis resolution without worsening fibrosis against 34.3% on placebo, and 36.8% achieved at least one stage of fibrosis improvement against 22.4%. This is an accelerated approval on histology — the second part of ESSENCE runs to 240 weeks to test whether it prevents liver-related events, reading out around 2029.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Phase 2 (SYNERGY-NASH) reported high rates of MASH resolution. It is not approved for this indication and the phase 3 liver programme has not delivered a histological verdict yet, which is the difference between it and the entry above.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    The most interesting mechanism in the class for this specific organ. The glucagon receptor arm acts directly on hepatocytes to increase fatty-acid oxidation — which is a liver mechanism rather than a weight-loss mechanism — and phase 2a reported near-normalisation of liver fat at higher doses. The TRIUMPH phase 3 programme measured weight and glycaemia, not liver histology, so this still rests on phase 2.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    The one non-incretin here with real liver data. In people with HIV and lipodystrophy, tesamorelin reduced visceral fat and reduced hepatic fat and progression of fibrosis in a randomised trial. That is a specific population with a specific problem, and it does not generalise to metabolic fatty liver in the general population.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Amylin analogue; liver effects would follow from weight loss rather than any hepatic mechanism of its own.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    AMPK activation, improved fatty-acid oxidation and reduced hepatic steatosis in mice.

  • 5-Amino-1MQ Theorized

    NNMT inhibition reduced fat mass in obese mice. Nothing human.

  • SLU-PP-332 Theorized

    ERR agonism increased fatty-acid oxidation in mice without exercise. Nothing human.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    Preclinical interest in hepatic NAD+ metabolism; no human outcome data.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is part of the pathology. Untested here, and its trial record elsewhere is poor.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Cited for hepatoprotection on the strength of rodent toxic-injury models. Not the same disease, not the same mechanism, and no human data.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Marketed for liver detoxification, which is not a description of anything MASLD does. Oral glutathione is largely broken down before absorption.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Weight loss remains the most effective intervention and the threshold is specific: around 7–10% of body weight produces steatohepatitis resolution in a substantial fraction of people, with fibrosis improvement needing more. That is now achievable pharmacologically as well as by diet and exercise, which is what changed.

There are two approved drugs. Resmetirom (Rezdiffra), an oral thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist approved in March 2024, and semaglutide 2.4 mg (Wegovy) approved in August 2025 — both for MASH with F2–F3 fibrosis, and neither indicated for simple steatosis without fibrosis. Staging matters more than the diagnosis, because fibrosis stage is what predicts liver outcomes and it is what the labels are written around. Non-invasive scores and elastography have largely replaced routine biopsy for that.

Alongside: alcohol reduction, treatment of coexisting type 2 diabetes, and statins, which are safe in fatty liver and substantially under-prescribed in it — people with MASLD are far more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than of their liver. Screening for oesophageal varices and hepatocellular carcinoma applies once cirrhosis is established.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Resmetirom and semaglutide are approved for MASH with fibrosis. Semaglutide is the peptide.

Growth hormone deficiency & the ageing GH axis

Diagnosed adult GH deficiency is a specific endocrine disorder with a diagnostic test and an approved treatment. The age-related decline in GH pulsatility is a different thing, and most community interest is in the second while borrowing the vocabulary of the first.

9 compounds documented
  • Octreotide Study

    The opposite drug. A somatostatin analogue prescribed to suppress growth hormone in acromegaly — worth reading alongside everything below it, because acromegaly is what chronically elevated GH actually looks like.

  • Sermorelin Study

    GHRH(1–29); historically used as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent in paediatric GH deficiency. The shortest-acting secretagogue here.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    A stabilised GHRH analogue with an approved indication — the only GH-axis compound in this library with one.

  • CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GHRH analogue. The no-DAC form preserves pulsatility; the DAC form does not, which is the whole argument between them.

  • Ipamorelin Theorized

    Selective ghrelin receptor agonist; the selectivity claim is that it raises GH without meaningfully raising cortisol or prolactin.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Anecdotal

    The archetypal community stack: a GHRH plus a ghrelin agonist, on the argument that two pathways amplify a pulse more than one.

  • Triple GH Blend Anecdotal

    A third secretagogue added to the above. No trial has studied any three-compound GH stack.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Bypasses the GH axis entirely and acts as the downstream effector — which also bypasses every feedback mechanism that limits it.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    A splice variant of IGF-1 pegylated for half-life. Rodent muscle data; no human trial.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Diagnosed adult GH deficiency is treated with recombinant human GH under endocrinology supervision, after a provocative test — not on the basis of symptoms or an IGF-1 level alone. For the age-related decline, the interventions with actual evidence are resistance training, adequate protein, sleep architecture and treatment of sleep apnoea; deep sleep is when the largest GH pulses occur, and secretagogues cannot substitute for the sleep they depend on.

Osteoporosis & bone density

Reduced bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, with fracture as the only outcome that matters. It is also where this library’s pulsatility principle gets its cleanest demonstration in all of medicine — the same hormone dissolves bone or builds it depending entirely on the shape of the exposure over time.

6 compounds documented
  • Teriparatide Study

    The canonical pulsatility result, and it is worth understanding properly. Parathyroid hormone is what dissolves bone — chronic hyperparathyroidism is a classic cause of bone loss. Yet teriparatide, a 34-residue fragment of that same hormone, is an approved anabolic osteoporosis drug with randomised fracture-reduction data. The difference is not the molecule. It is the time profile: continuous elevation favours resorption, a once-daily spike favours formation. That is why it is a daily injection and why an infusion or a depot of the same peptide would do the opposite of what is wanted. The osteosarcoma boxed warning and the two-year lifetime cap were both removed in November 2020 when human cohort data failed to reproduce the rat signal.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 is genuinely involved in bone formation, and that is where the argument stops. An unregulated IGF-1 analogue designed to evade its binding proteins is not an osteoporosis intervention, and the growth-signalling caution applies with force in the older population that actually has osteoporosis.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH raises IGF-1 and IGF-1 affects bone turnover, which is real. The step from moving turnover markers to reducing fractures is the one that has never been taken here — and it is the only step that counts. Bone density and bone strength are not the same thing, which is the same “mass is not function” problem this site keeps running into.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Copper is a cofactor for lysyl oxidase, which cross-links collagen — including bone collagen. In vitro reasoning, and topical delivery does not reach bone.

  • Sermorelin Theorized

    Same GH-axis logic as the blend above, weaker output, same missing fracture data.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Longevity framing extended to bone by association. No bone data of any kind.

What actually has evidence for this condition

This is the rare section where the peptide class already solved much of the problem through the normal route. Teriparatide and abaloparatide are both peptides — analogues of parathyroid hormone and of PTH-related protein respectively — and both are approved anabolic treatments with fracture data. They are prescription products obtained through a doctor, not grey-market items, and the version of them sold outside that channel offers nothing the licensed drug does not.

Sequence matters more than most people realise: anabolic first, then antiresorptive. Building bone with teriparatide, abaloparatide or romosozumab and then locking the gains in with a bisphosphonate or denosumab produces better results than the reverse order. Starting with an antiresorptive blunts the subsequent anabolic response. Someone at high fracture risk who is put on alendronate for a decade first has had the more effective sequence taken away from them.

And the single most important safety point in this field is about stopping a drug, not starting one. Denosumab is not a drug you can simply discontinue — its effect reverses quickly, bone resorption rebounds above baseline, and multiple spontaneous vertebral fractures have been reported, in some cases after nothing more than a missed dose. Anyone stopping it needs a bisphosphonate to follow. This is well documented, still under-communicated, and worth knowing for anyone who has a relative on it.

There was another approved peptide here, and it lost the indication. Salmon calcitonin was used for postmenopausal osteoporosis for years. In July 2012 the EMA concluded it should no longer be recommended for it, on weak efficacy together with a cancer signal — the PROOF trial reported malignancy in 8.9% of the treated group against 5.1% on placebo — and a US advisory panel voted against continued marketing for the indication. An approved peptide drug, on the market for years, withdrawn from its main use because it did not work well enough and might cause harm. That is the process working, and it is the same molecule that appears as a tumour marker under thyroid cancer.

Everything else: bisphosphonates, denosumab, romosozumab — a sclerostin antibody that builds bone and suppresses resorption at once, carrying a cardiovascular boxed warning — adequate vitamin D and calcium, and progressive resistance and impact loading, which is the intervention this readership is best placed to deliver and which also addresses falls. Excluding secondary causes matters: coeliac disease, hyperparathyroidism, hypogonadism, myeloma, and long-term corticosteroids. Men are substantially under-screened and under-treated, and so is anyone who has already had a fragility fracture — the treatment gap after a first fracture is one of the largest in medicine.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Teriparatide, abaloparatide and calcitonin are the peptides. Romosozumab and denosumab are antibodies; bisphosphonates are small molecules.

HIV-associated lipodystrophy

Redistribution of body fat toward visceral depots in people on long-term antiretroviral therapy. Included because it is the approved indication that legitimised a compound the community uses for something else.

1 compound documented
  • Tesamorelin Study

    Approved for this indication on randomised trials showing reduced visceral adipose tissue. Every other use of this compound is off-label extrapolation from this evidence base.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Antiretroviral regimen modification where feasible, and tesamorelin as the approved pharmacological option. Visceral fat re-accumulates on discontinuation.

Group 02

Musculoskeletal & connective tissue

The largest cluster of community interest in this library and the thinnest human evidence base in it. Almost everything here rests on rodent tendon and rodent muscle work.

Tendon & ligament injury, tendinopathy

Tendon heals slowly because it is poorly vascularised. Most tendinopathy is degenerative rather than inflammatory, which is why anti-inflammatory approaches underperform expectations.

9 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    The most-cited compound in this library for tendon. The underlying work is rodent tendon and ligament transection studies reporting accelerated healing and increased tendon fibroblast outgrowth. No human trial in tendinopathy exists.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Thymosin beta-4 fragment; actin sequestration, cell migration and angiogenesis in animal models of soft-tissue injury.

  • Wolverine Stack Anecdotal

    The BPC-157 + TB-500 combination is the single most-used injury stack in the grey market and has never been studied as a combination in anything.

  • GLOW Anecdotal

    Adds GHK-Cu on a collagen-remodelling rationale.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Adds KPV for an anti-inflammatory component on top of the above.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Copper peptide with genuine in vitro data on collagen synthesis and matrix remodelling.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Local anabolic signalling. Also the compound in this section with the most serious theoretical downside — see the oncology caution.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    Mechano-growth factor, upregulated by mechanical loading in muscle. Rodent data.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH and IGF-1 have a documented role in connective-tissue turnover; the human evidence for accelerated tendon recovery does not exist.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Progressive mechanical loading is the treatment with the best evidence in tendinopathy — heavy slow resistance or eccentric protocols, sustained over months. It is unglamorous, it is slow, and it outperforms every injectable that has been compared against it. Load management, adequate protein, and time. Corticosteroid injection gives short-term relief at the cost of worse long-term outcomes in several tendons.

A specific problem with the compounds above: they are used to shorten a recovery that is protective. Pain during tendon healing is load information. Removing it without changing the underlying capacity is how partial tears become complete ones.

Osteoarthritis & joint degeneration

Cartilage loss with subchondral bone change and low-grade synovial inflammation. Cartilage is avascular and aneural, which constrains both healing and the interpretation of pain relief.

6 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent work on cartilage and joint injury. Widely used intra-articularly in the grey market, which is a sterility problem as much as a pharmacology one — a septic joint is a surgical emergency.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Same animal-model basis, extended to joint tissue.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Matrix remodelling rationale; in vitro.

  • KPV Theorized

    Alpha-MSH fragment with anti-inflammatory activity in animal models.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Combines the above on the argument that repair and anti-inflammation should be simultaneous.

  • ARA-290 Study

    Reached human trials for neuropathic pain rather than joint disease; the tissue-protective erythropoietin-receptor rationale is what draws interest here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Exercise therapy and weight reduction have the strongest evidence in knee osteoarthritis and are consistently first-line in every guideline. Topical and oral NSAIDs, physiotherapy, and joint replacement for end-stage disease. Glucosamine and chondroitin have been extensively studied and the results are, at best, marginal.

Muscle wasting, sarcopenia & cachexia

Age-related or disease-driven loss of muscle mass and function. The distinction matters: sarcopenia responds to loading and protein; cachexia is inflammation-driven and largely does not.

8 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Direct anabolic signalling with the systemic exposure that makes it interesting and dangerous in the same breath.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    Rodent satellite-cell activation data.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH secretagogues raise IGF-1; GH itself increases lean mass in trials while its effect on strength and function is much less convincing.

  • Ipamorelin Theorized

    Ghrelin receptor agonism also drives appetite, which is the more plausible route to benefit in a cachectic patient.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Exercise-mimetic framing from rodent work; improved exercise capacity in aged mice.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Mitochondrial peptide associated with healthspan markers.

  • SS-31 Study

    Reached human trials in primary mitochondrial myopathy and in Barth syndrome — the mitochondrial-function endpoint, not general muscle mass.

  • SLU-PP-332 Theorized

    Increased running capacity in mice without training.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Progressive resistance training plus adequate protein — roughly 1.2–1.6 g/kg/day in older adults, distributed across meals — remains the intervention with the best evidence, and nothing above substitutes for it. Vitamin D repletion where deficient. In disease-driven cachexia the priority is treating the underlying disease, and appetite stimulation alone has repeatedly failed to change outcomes.

Carpal tunnel syndrome & nerve entrapment

Compression of the median nerve at the wrist, causing numbness, tingling and weakness. It is here because it is a recognised dose-limiting effect of the growth hormone axis, and because people using GH secretagogues frequently do not know that is what their hands are telling them.

7 compounds documented
  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    The reason this entry exists. Growth hormone causes sodium and water retention, and fluid within the confined carpal tunnel compresses the median nerve. Carpal tunnel symptoms, joint swelling and stiffness are the classic dose-limiting effects of GH — documented in GH replacement therapy and characteristic of acromegaly. In someone using a secretagogue, new hand numbness is far more likely to be this than a coincidence, and the response is to reduce or stop rather than to push through. Symptoms typically resolve when the dose comes down.

  • Sermorelin Theorized

    Same axis, generally weaker output, same effect at sufficient dose.

  • CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Same, and the DAC form’s sustained exposure is the profile more likely to produce it.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    Approved, and its trial data lists arthralgia, peripheral oedema and paraesthesia among expected effects — which is the same fluid-retention picture in a properly documented setting.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Fluid retention and soft tissue effects are described with IGF-1 administration as well.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Widely injected locally for wrist and hand symptoms. If the cause is systemic fluid retention from another compound, treating the wrist is treating the wrong thing — and persistent numbness needs assessing, because prolonged compression causes permanent nerve damage and muscle wasting.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Same local-injection pattern, same objection.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The pattern is distinctive: numbness and tingling in the thumb, index, middle and half the ring finger — not the little finger — characteristically worse at night and waking the person, who shakes the hand to relieve it. Weakness and wasting of the thumb muscles is a later sign and indicates the compression has gone on too long. Persistent numbness or any visible muscle wasting should be assessed promptly rather than managed at home, because nerve damage at that stage may not fully recover.

Look for the cause rather than treating the wrist in isolation. Beyond the GH axis: hypothyroidism, diabetes, pregnancy — where it is common and usually resolves after delivery — rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, and occupational or training exposure to vibration and sustained grip. Acromegaly presents this way often enough that new bilateral carpal tunnel in an adult is a recognised prompt to think about it, alongside changes in ring, glove or shoe size.

Treatment: night splinting in a neutral position, which is simple and genuinely effective in mild cases; treating the underlying cause; corticosteroid injection for temporary relief; and surgical decompression, which is a short, highly effective procedure with good long-term results in moderate to severe cases. Nerve conduction studies confirm the diagnosis and grade severity where it is unclear. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow — affecting the little finger and ring finger — is the other common entrapment and is aggravated by prolonged elbow flexion and by leaning on the elbow.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No drug treatment is approved. Splinting and surgery are the effective interventions, and the peptides here cause the problem rather than treating it.

Fibromyalgia

Central sensitisation — an amplification of pain processing rather than a peripheral tissue problem. That single fact is the yardstick every peptide rationale in this section should be measured against, and it is why the treatments that work act centrally.

11 compounds documented
  • Semax + Selank Theorized

    The only entry here whose mechanism is in the right compartment. Both act centrally, on BDNF and on anxiolytic signalling, and the approved fibromyalgia drugs are centrally acting too. Human data is largely Russian-language and methodologically limited.

  • Semax Theorized

    Central BDNF modulation; studied in Russia in stroke and cognition, never in fibromyalgia. Relevant to the cognitive complaint patients describe as “fibro fog”, which is real and disabling.

  • Selank Theorized

    Anxiolytic. Anxiety and non-restorative sleep are both core to the fibromyalgia burden, and treating them is a legitimate target even without touching pain processing directly.

  • DSIP Theorized

    Non-restorative sleep is close to universal in fibromyalgia, which makes sleep architecture a genuine target — and the newest approved drug for this condition works precisely there. DSIP is the wrong tool for the right target: rejected by the PCAC, no identified receptor, and human evidence from the 1970s and 80s that was small and inconsistent.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Widely discussed, but its evidence base is peripheral tissue repair — the wrong compartment for a central sensitisation disorder. Where it may help is a genuinely comorbid injury, which is a narrower and more defensible claim.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Same objection, more starkly: a tissue-repair agent in a condition defined by the absence of a structural lesion has nothing to act on.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Community reporting on pain and sleep. No mechanism that reaches central pain processing.

  • Wolverine Stack Anecdotal

    Same.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    More interesting than the repair peptides. Small fibre neuropathy is documented in a subset of fibromyalgia patients, and ARA-290 has randomised human trial evidence in small fibre neuropathy of other causes using an objective structural endpoint. That is a specific hypothesis about a subgroup, not a fibromyalgia treatment, and it has not been tested here.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Weight loss reduces mechanical load and systemic inflammation. No fibromyalgia-specific evidence.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing, on the contested premise that fibromyalgia has an immune driver.

What actually has evidence for this condition

There are now four approved drugs, and the newest one is the most interesting. Pregabalin, duloxetine and milnacipran have been the options for over fifteen years. In August 2025 the FDA approved TNX-102 SL (Tonmya), a sublingual formulation of cyclobenzaprine — the first new fibromyalgia therapy in more than fifteen years, supported by two phase 3 trials. What makes it notable is its target: non-restorative sleep, long recognised as a core driver of fibromyalgia and rarely addressed directly by the approved drugs. Sublingual delivery bypasses first-pass metabolism and reduces the long half-life metabolite responsible for next-day grogginess.

Graded exercise combined with cognitive behavioural therapy still has the strongest evidence of any intervention — and note that this is the opposite of the position in ME/CFS, where graded exercise was withdrawn from guidelines. The two conditions overlap and are frequently confused, and the exercise advice diverges completely. If post-exertional malaise is present, the ME/CFS approach applies, and that distinction is worth establishing before starting any activity programme.

Low-dose naltrexone has more evidence in fibromyalgia than in any other off-label use, with randomised trials and meta-analyses reporting pain reduction at around 4.5 mg daily, a coherent mechanism through microglial and neuroinflammatory signalling, and a benign side-effect profile. The trials are small, and the response rates reported are at least comparable to the approved drugs. It is inexpensive, prescribable, and not a peptide.

Note what duloxetine and milnacipran are: serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. The treatments that work in fibromyalgia act centrally, on pain processing. Sleep deserves real attention beyond the new drug — obstructive sleep apnoea is under-diagnosed in this population and is treatable.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Pregabalin, duloxetine, milnacipran and TNX-102 SL are the four approved options; none is a peptide.

Low back pain

The leading cause of disability worldwide, and one of the most common reasons compounds in this library get injected at all. It is also a condition where the evidence points somewhere very different from where the marketing does.

9 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Probably the single commonest reason people in this space try this compound, and the mechanism does not fit the condition. Its evidence base is tendon and soft tissue repair in rodents. Most low back pain has no identifiable structural lesion to repair — that is not a dismissal, the pain is real, but it means there is frequently no damaged tissue for a repair agent to act on. Where a specific structural problem does exist, it is usually disc or nerve related, and nothing here has been shown to reach or affect either. Note also that imaging findings correlate poorly with pain: disc degeneration, bulges and annular tears are common in people with no pain at all.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Same objection, same absent structural target.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Marketed for back and joint pain. No component reaches the mechanisms that actually drive persistent back pain.

  • Wolverine Stack Anecdotal

    Same.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in rodent models. Persistent low back pain is not principally an inflammatory disease, which is why anti-inflammatories help acutely and stop helping.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Collagen remodelling in vitro. Not delivered to spinal structures by any available route.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect and genuinely supported: excess weight worsens back pain, and weight loss improves it. That is a real mechanism rather than a peptide one.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Occasionally used for the central and mood components of chronic pain. No evidence in back pain.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Disc degeneration involves mitochondrial dysfunction in laboratory work. The intervertebral disc is avascular — the least accessible tissue in the body for a systemically administered compound — which is a delivery problem before it is an efficacy question.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Start with what is genuinely urgent, because it is rare and it is missed. Red flags needing prompt assessment: bladder or bowel dysfunction, numbness in the saddle area, or progressive leg weakness — cauda equina syndrome is a surgical emergency and delay causes permanent damage. Also: significant trauma, fever, unexplained weight loss, a history of cancer — see bone metastases — pain that is worse at night or at rest rather than with movement, and new severe back pain over 50 or under 20.

For everything else, the evidence is unglamorous and consistent: stay active. Bed rest makes outcomes worse. Most acute episodes improve substantially within weeks regardless of treatment. Imaging in the absence of red flags does not improve outcomes and makes them slightly worse, because incidental findings get treated as explanations and people become more fearful and less active. Guidelines across countries now recommend against routine imaging, and against opioids.

What has evidence in persistent back pain: exercise — essentially any kind, with adherence mattering more than modality; progressive resistance training specifically has good evidence, which matters because fear of loading the spine is common and counterproductive; cognitive functional therapy and pain education; addressing sleep, stress and mood, which are not psychological explanations for the pain but genuine modifiers of it. NSAIDs help modestly short-term. Chronic back pain involves central sensitisation — the same mechanism described under fibromyalgia — which is why treatments aimed at tissue stop working and treatments aimed at the nervous system start to.

Surgery has a clear role for radiculopathy with progressive deficit, for cauda equina, and for spinal stenosis with disabling claudication. It has a much weaker role for non-specific back pain, and fusion for that indication has not performed well against structured rehabilitation. Injections have limited and mostly short-lived benefit.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide is approved for back pain anywhere. The intervention with the best evidence is exercise, and it is free.

Gout & hyperuricaemia

Crystal arthritis caused by urate deposition — the most treatable form of inflammatory arthritis there is, and one of the worst treated. It matters here because an acutely hot, swollen joint in an athletic population gets attributed to injury, and because the diet culture around it is largely wrong.

6 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The misattribution risk, and it is specific. Gout presents as a rapidly painful, hot, swollen joint — classically the base of the big toe, but also the knee, ankle or midfoot. In someone who trains, that reads as an injury, and injury is what compounds like this get used for. Gout is diagnosed and cured pharmacologically; an untreated recurrent gout attack destroys the joint over years. Treating it as a training niggle is how people end up with permanent damage from an entirely preventable disease.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in rodent models. Gout is an intensely inflammatory condition driven by the NLRP3 inflammasome, so the direction is right and the specificity is absent — colchicine, NSAIDs and steroids all do this better and are proven.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Marketed for joint pain without distinguishing which joint disease. Gout is not osteoarthritis and is not rheumatoid arthritis, and all three are treated completely differently.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Repair framing against a crystal-driven inflammatory process.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Genuinely relevant. Obesity raises urate and gout risk substantially, and weight loss lowers urate. Observational data suggests GLP-1 use is associated with lower gout incidence. Note the caveat that applies to rapid weight loss generally — sharp changes in urate in either direction can precipitate an attack, which is also why starting urate-lowering therapy needs cover.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed for joint health. Note that high-dose niacin raises urate and can precipitate gout, which is worth distinguishing from NAD+ precursors and worth knowing before combining products.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Gout is curable in the ordinary sense of the word, and most people with it are not cured because the wrong thing gets treated. Attacks are treated with colchicine, NSAIDs or steroids. But the disease is the urate level, and lowering it below the saturation threshold — typically a target under 360 µmol/L, or under 300 with tophi — dissolves the deposits and stops the attacks permanently. Allopurinol is inexpensive, taken once daily, and treat-to-target dosing is what works; the common failure is being left on a low starting dose that never reaches target, then being told the drug did not work. Febuxostat is the alternative.

Two errors are made constantly. The first: stopping allopurinol during an attack. If you are already on it, keep taking it — stopping makes things worse. The second: starting urate-lowering therapy without prophylactic cover, because falling urate mobilises crystals and can trigger attacks for months. Low-dose colchicine cover during that period is standard, and not warning people about it is why they abandon treatment that would have worked.

On diet, where the traditional advice is mostly wrong. The classic purine-restriction lists overstate their case. What genuinely matters: beer and spirits, fructose and sugar-sweetened drinks, and excess red meat and shellfish. What does not raise risk despite decades of advice: purine-rich vegetables and pulses. Dairy and coffee are associated with lower risk. Dehydration and crash dieting both precipitate attacks — relevant to anyone cutting weight. Diet alone will not control established gout, and presenting it as an alternative to allopurinol is how people spend years having attacks.

Also relevant: thiazide and loop diuretics raise urate; chronic kidney disease raises it; and gout is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome, hypertension and cardiovascular disease, so a gout diagnosis is a reason to check the rest. Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia on a blood test is generally not treated in the absence of attacks or tophi.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Pegloticase — a pegylated uricase enzyme — is used in severe refractory tophaceous gout. It is an enzyme rather than a peptide drug, and everything else here is a small molecule.

Wound healing, scarring & skin

The one area where the topical evidence is genuinely better than the injectable evidence, and where a cosmetic-grade product does most of what is being claimed.

7 compounds documented
  • GHK-Cu Study

    Human topical data in skin — the strongest evidence of any compound in this library for the use it is actually marketed for. Trials support topical application on wrinkles, skin density and wound healing.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent wound and burn models.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Cell migration and angiogenesis in animal wound models.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Endogenous antimicrobial peptide with a documented role in wound re-epithelialisation — and a pro-inflammatory profile that makes it a poor candidate for indiscriminate use.

  • GLOW Anecdotal

    The skin-and-repair blend; GHK-Cu is doing most of the work in the argument.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Adds KPV.

  • Melanotan-2 Anecdotal

    Not a healing compound. Included here because pigmentation change is what people notice, and because it drives naevus darkening — a real dermatological concern.

What actually has evidence for this condition

For chronic wounds: debridement, offloading, moisture balance, infection control and glycaemic control in diabetes. For cosmetic skin outcomes: sun protection, topical retinoids and topical GHK-Cu — all of which have better evidence than any injectable in this section.

Group 03

Gastrointestinal

BPC-157 is a gastric peptide by origin, which makes this the one area where its evidence base is at least in the right organ. It is still rodent evidence.

Inflammatory bowel disease — overview

Immune-mediated, relapsing, and capable of causing irreversible bowel damage while someone experiments. The stakes of delay here are higher than almost anywhere else on this page.

7 compounds documented
  • Teduglutide Theorized

    Approved for short bowel syndrome, not for IBD. Listed here because it is the proof that a peptide can grow intestinal mucosa — and because that trophic mechanism cuts both ways in an inflamed, dysplasia-prone colon.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent colitis models report reduced inflammation and mucosal healing. It was derived from a gastric juice protein, so the tissue is at least the right one. No human trial in IBD.

  • KPV Theorized

    Alpha-MSH tripeptide with anti-inflammatory activity in rodent colitis, including via oral and targeted delivery.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has a documented role in mucosal defence; it is also elevated in active inflammation, which complicates the direction of the argument.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    BPC-157 plus KPV is the most-discussed grey-market IBD combination. Neither component has human data.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immunomodulation in a condition treated with immunosuppression — pushing immune tone in an unspecified direction is not obviously the goal.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Oxidative stress is elevated in active IBD. Repletion changing the disease course is not established.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Mesalazine, corticosteroids for induction, thiopurines, methotrexate, and the biologic classes — anti-TNF, anti-integrin, anti-IL-12/23, and JAK inhibitors — all with trial data on mucosal healing and on avoiding surgery. Nutritional therapy has real evidence in paediatric Crohn's. Untreated inflammation causes strictures, fistulae and bowel resection. The cost of substituting an unproven compound for a proven one in this disease is measured in surgery.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: None for IBD itself — the biologic classes used here are monoclonal antibodies and small molecules rather than peptides. Teduglutide is approved for short bowel syndrome; see that section.

Short bowel syndrome & intestinal failure

Not enough intestine left to absorb enough fluid and nutrition, usually after extensive resection for Crohn’s disease, mesenteric infarction, volvulus or trauma. People depend on parenteral support through a central line, with the catheter sepsis, thrombosis and liver disease that come with it.

3 compounds documented
  • Teduglutide Study

    Approved. A GLP-2 analogue — the other hormone cut from the same proglucagon precursor as GLP-1, doing something entirely different. It increases villus height and crypt depth, and randomised trials reported reduced weekly parenteral support volume, with a minority achieving complete independence from it.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Heavily discussed for gut repair on the strength of rodent models. Teduglutide is what an approved intestinal trophic peptide actually looks like, and the comparison is instructive: it requires colonoscopy before starting and surveillance thereafter.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Listed for contrast. GLP-1 slows transit and suppresses appetite — the opposite of what is wanted here. Same precursor gene, opposite clinical use.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Specialist intestinal failure management: optimised parenteral nutrition, oral rehydration solutions, antimotility and antisecretory agents, meticulous catheter care to prevent line sepsis, and surgical options including autologous reconstruction or transplantation in selected cases. Teduglutide is added to that, not substituted for it.

The surveillance requirement is the mechanism. A drug whose entire action is increased intestinal crypt proliferation carries a labelled risk of accelerating neoplastic growth, which is why colonoscopy and upper GI endoscopy are required before starting in adults and repeated on a schedule thereafter.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Somatropin and glutamine have also held indications in this condition in some jurisdictions.

Ulcerative colitis

Continuous mucosal inflammation beginning at the rectum and extending proximally, confined to the colon and to the mucosal layer — which is what separates it from Crohn’s and why its complications are different. Bloody diarrhoea and urgency dominate; the long-run concerns are colectomy, acute severe colitis and colorectal dysplasia in long-standing extensive disease.

6 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    This is the one condition in the entire library where the compound under discussion was actually tested in it. Under the code PL 14736, BPC-157 completed a randomised placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of enemas in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis, presented in abstract form in 2005, after a published phase 1 in healthy volunteers. The full results were never published and no product followed — a pattern that more often reflects a negative result than a positive one. Note the route the developers chose: rectal, delivered to the inflamed mucosa. Not subcutaneous.

  • KPV Theorized

    Rodent colitis models report reduced inflammation via NF-κB and MAPK, and the interesting delivery work is oral and colon-targeted — again, local to the mucosa. Frequently paired with BPC-157 in grey-market protocols, by injection, which is neither compound’s studied route.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has a genuine role in colonic mucosal defence, and reduced expression has been reported in ulcerative colitis — which, unusually for this compound, points the same way as supplementation for once. It remains elevated in other inflamed tissues and is a T-cell autoantigen in psoriasis; the direction is condition-specific rather than favourable in general.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    BPC-157 plus KPV is the most-used grey-market colitis combination. Neither component has published controlled human evidence in ulcerative colitis, and the one trial that exists was of a single component, by a different route, with unpublished results.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Mucosal oxidative stress is elevated in active disease. Repletion altering the course is not established, and the antioxidant caution on that page matters if thiopurines are in use.

  • Teduglutide Theorized

    Not indicated, and mechanistically questionable here — a trophic agent increasing crypt proliferation in a colon already under dysplasia surveillance is the wrong direction.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Ulcerative colitis has had an unusually productive few years, which is the reason to be impatient with unproven alternatives. The IL-23 class arrived: mirikizumab was approved in October 2023 with a single-injection monthly maintenance regimen following in October 2025; risankizumab was approved in June 2024, becoming the first IL-23 inhibitor licensed for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s; and guselkumab gained a subcutaneous induction option in September 2025. Etrasimod and ozanimod are oral S1P modulators. Upadacitinib’s indication statement was updated in October 2025.

Before those: mesalazine remains genuinely effective in mild-to-moderate disease and is under-dosed as often as it is under-used — and topical mesalazine, as a suppository or enema, outperforms oral for distal disease, which is the same delivery logic the PL 14736 trial used. Corticosteroids for induction only, thiopurines, anti-TNF and vedolizumab.

Two things not to miss: acute severe ulcerative colitis is a medical emergency with a real mortality and needs hospital admission, not escalation at home. And surveillance colonoscopy in long-standing extensive colitis exists because the dysplasia risk is real and detectable — it is the part of management most easily lost when someone disengages from care in favour of self-treatment.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: The IL-23 inhibitors, anti-TNF and anti-integrin biologics, and the oral S1P modulators and JAK inhibitors. None is a peptide.

Coeliac disease

An immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by gluten in people carrying HLA-DQ2 or DQ8, producing villous atrophy, malabsorption and a wide range of extraintestinal effects. It is also — and this is why it matters far beyond its own section — the best-characterised intestinal barrier disease in medicine, which makes it the place where barrier-repair claims have actually been put to the test.

6 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Widely sold on tight-junction and barrier-integrity claims, and heavily discussed in coeliac communities. Read the established section below before this one — the tight-junction mechanism has been tested directly in this condition, by a purpose-built drug, and it did not work.

  • KPV Theorized

    Mucosal anti-inflammatory action. Coeliac is antigen-driven rather than generically inflammatory, so suppressing inflammation without removing the trigger addresses the consequence and not the cause.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Altered antimicrobial peptide expression has been described in coeliac mucosa. No therapeutic evidence, and the autoimmune cautions on that page apply.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune modulation in an immune-mediated disease driven by a specific antigen, using a compound whose approved uses depend on enhancing immune response. The direction problem is at its clearest here.

  • Teduglutide Theorized

    Mucosal growth in a condition defined by villous atrophy sounds like an obvious match, and it is not indicated. Refractory coeliac disease carries a risk of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, which makes a trophic agent with a labelled neoplastic-growth warning a poor fit specifically here.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    The general grey-market gut protocol, applied to a condition with a definitive treatment that costs nothing pharmacologically.

What actually has evidence for this condition

A strict lifelong gluten-free diet is the treatment, and it works. Mucosal healing follows in most adults, though it takes months to years and is slower than symptom improvement. Dietitian involvement measurably improves adherence and nutritional adequacy. Check iron, B12, folate, vitamin D and bone density, and screen first-degree relatives. Diagnosis must come before the diet starts — serology and biopsy both normalise on gluten withdrawal, and people who self-treat first frequently cannot get a diagnosis afterwards without a formal gluten challenge.

Now the part that matters to the rest of this library. Two peptides were developed specifically for coeliac disease and both failed in properly powered trials:

Larazotide acetate is an eight-amino-acid peptide that antagonises zonulin and regulates intestinal tight junctions — a purpose-built barrier drug, designed to prevent pathological tight-junction opening. It reached phase 3 as an adjunct for patients already on a gluten-free diet. The programme was discontinued in June 2022 after an interim analysis found the sample size required to demonstrate benefit was too large to justify continuing. The tight-junction hypothesis was tested, in the best-characterised barrier condition there is, by a drug built for the purpose — and it did not produce symptomatic benefit. Every "heals the gut lining" and "restores tight junctions" claim on this site should be read against that result.

Nexvax2 was a peptide-based antigen-specific immunotherapy targeting gluten-reactive T cells in HLA-DQ2.5 carriers — mechanistically elegant and aimed at tolerance rather than symptoms. Its phase 2 trial was terminated in 2019 when interim analysis showed no meaningful protection from gluten exposure against placebo. Roughly 150 participants had enrolled.

Other approaches remain in development — gluten-degrading enzymes, transglutaminase 2 inhibitors, tolerising nanoparticles — and none has produced an approved product. The diet remains the only treatment.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: None. There is no approved pharmacological treatment for coeliac disease anywhere, which is precisely what makes the two failed peptide programmes worth knowing about.

Irritable bowel syndrome

A disorder of gut-brain interaction: abdominal pain associated with altered bowel habit, without structural disease to explain it. Central to it are visceral hypersensitivity — normal gut distension registering as painful — and altered motility. Subtype matters, because the treatments diverge completely: IBS-C, IBS-D and IBS-M are managed differently.

6 compounds documented
  • Linaclotide Study

    Approved for IBS with constipation, and the only compound in this library with randomised human evidence in IBS at all. A 14-residue peptide taken as a capsule, acting on the luminal surface. It improves stool frequency and abdominal pain on a composite endpoint — the pain component runs through a separate mechanism, cyclic GMP acting on submucosal afferent nerves, which is why it outperforms an ordinary laxative.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    The most-used compound for IBS in the grey market, and its human history is more interesting than usually reported — see the IBD and Crohn entries. For IBS specifically there is no controlled evidence, and this is the category with the largest placebo response in the library because every endpoint is subjective and fluctuating.

  • KPV Theorized

    Mucosal anti-inflammatory action, with the useful animal work using oral and colon-targeted delivery rather than injection. IBS is not primarily an inflammatory disease, which weakens the rationale relative to IBD.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    The common grey-market gut protocol. Four components, no controlled evidence in IBS, and no way to attribute anything.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Runs the wrong way for IBS-C. GLP-1 agonism delays gastric emptying and slows transit, which worsens constipation — and constipation is among the most commonly reported effects of this class. Relevant as an interaction rather than a treatment.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Marketed for gut health. Its injectable evidence concerns hepatic and dermatological endpoints, not intestinal ones.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Exclude the mimics first, because they are treatable and IBS is not. Coeliac serology, faecal calprotectin to separate inflammatory bowel disease from IBS, and — in the right context — bile acid malabsorption, which is common, frequently misdiagnosed as IBS-D, and responds well to a bile acid sequestrant. Alarm features warrant investigation rather than a syndrome label.

A structured low-FODMAP trial with reintroduction is the dietary intervention with the best evidence, and the reintroduction phase is the part most often skipped — it is not meant to be a permanent restriction. Soluble fibre helps; insoluble often does not. Gut-directed cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnotherapy have better evidence than most drug options and are badly under-used, which is a consequence of the gut-brain axis being real rather than a suggestion the symptoms are imagined.

By subtype: for IBS-C, linaclotide, plecanatide, tenapanor and osmotic laxatives. For IBS-D, loperamide, rifaximin, eluxadoline and — in refractory cases with prescribing restrictions — alosetron. Antispasmodics and peppermint oil for pain; low-dose tricyclics for IBS-D and SSRIs for IBS-C, used for their effect on gut-brain signalling rather than on mood.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Plecanatide and tenapanor for IBS-C; rifaximin and eluxadoline for IBS-D — none of them peptides except the guanylate cyclase-C agonists.

Crohn’s disease

Transmural, patchy inflammation anywhere from mouth to anus, most often terminal ileum and colon. What distinguishes it from ulcerative colitis is what the inflammation does through the full thickness of the bowel wall: strictures, fistulae, abscesses and perianal disease. A substantial proportion of patients still require surgery, and resection is what produces the short bowel syndrome that teduglutide exists to treat.

7 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    The compound with the most relevant history here, and it is not purely preclinical. It was developed by a Croatian pharmaceutical company under the codes PL-10, PLD-116 and PL 14736, completed a published phase 1 study by rectal administration in healthy volunteers, and completed a randomised placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of enemas in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis, presented in abstract form in 2005. The full results were never published and no product followed. That is not proof the trial failed — but unpublished results plus abandoned development is a pattern that more often reflects a negative result than a positive one. Separately, rodent work from the same programme reports healing of colocutaneous fistulas and intestinal anastomoses.

  • Teduglutide Study

    Not a Crohn treatment — the treatment for what Crohn surgery leaves behind. Approved for short bowel syndrome with parenteral dependence, and extensive resection for Crohn is one of the commonest routes into that condition. Its trophic mechanism is also the reason it is not used in active Crohn: increased crypt proliferation in an inflamed, dysplasia-prone bowel is not obviously desirable.

  • KPV Theorized

    Rodent colitis models report reduced inflammation through NF-κB and MAPK signalling, and the more interesting work used oral and colon-targeted delivery designed to act at the mucosa. Subcutaneous injection for a gut condition delivers it everywhere except the tissue the evidence is about.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has a real role in mucosal defence, and NOD2 — the strongest genetic association in Crohn — sits in the same innate immune pathway. It is also elevated in active inflammation, which complicates the direction entirely.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    BPC-157 plus KPV is the most-discussed grey-market IBD combination. Neither component has controlled human evidence in Crohn, and the combination has none in anything.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune modulation in a disease treated by immunosuppression, in a compound whose approved uses all depend on enhancing immune response. Anyone on a biologic should treat this as an interaction question for their gastroenterologist.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Oxidative stress is elevated in active disease. Repletion changing the course is not established, and the antioxidant/chemotherapy caution on that page is worth reading if thiopurines or methotrexate are in the picture.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Crohn’s therapy has changed more in the last two years than in the preceding decade, which is the reason to be impatient with unproven alternatives. The IL-23 class arrived properly: risankizumab was approved for Crohn’s, and mirikizumab followed in January 2025 on the VIVID-1 trial, where 53% reached clinical remission at one year against 36% on placebo. Upadacitinib’s label was updated in October 2025 to permit use before anti-TNF therapy. Alongside those: anti-TNF agents, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, thiopurines and methotrexate.

Exclusive enteral nutrition has real evidence in paediatric Crohn’s — comparable to corticosteroids for inducing remission, without the steroid burden — and is under-used in adults. Smoking cessation matters more in Crohn’s than in almost any other condition on this site: smoking measurably worsens the disease, increases the need for surgery and raises post-operative recurrence. Iron replacement for anaemia, vitamin D and B12 after ileal resection, and surveillance colonoscopy in long-standing colonic disease.

The cost of delay is anatomical. Untreated inflammation produces strictures, fistulae and resection, and none of that is recoverable. That is the specific reason substituting an unproven compound for a proven one in this disease is more consequential than in most conditions in this library.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: The IBD armoury is monoclonal antibodies and small molecules — anti-TNF, anti-integrin, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK inhibitors. None is a peptide, and together they are why this disease is now controllable.

Intestinal permeability & “leaky gut” claims

"Leaky gut" as a marketing term versus intestinal permeability as a measurable phenomenon. The measurement is real; the causal story built on it usually is not — and the tight-junction hypothesis has now been tested directly. See coeliac disease, where a purpose-built tight-junction regulator reached phase 3 and failed. For irritable bowel syndrome itself, see the dedicated entry above.

6 compounds documented
  • Linaclotide Study

    Approved for IBS with constipation. A 14-residue peptide taken as a capsule that is not absorbed — it activates guanylate cyclase-C on the luminal surface, increasing secretion and reducing visceral pain through a separate effect on afferent nerves.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Tight-junction and barrier-integrity effects in rodent models.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory at the mucosal level in animal work.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Antimicrobial activity relevant to the microbiome argument.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    The most-used grey-market gut protocol. Entirely community-reported.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Marketed heavily for gut health; the intravenous and injectable evidence is about hepatic and dermatological endpoints, not intestinal ones.

What actually has evidence for this condition

For IBS: a trial of a low-FODMAP diet with structured reintroduction, soluble fibre, gut-directed cognitive behavioural therapy or hypnotherapy — which has better evidence than most drug options — antispasmodics, and targeted agents by subtype. Excluding coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease before settling on an IBS label matters more than any of the above.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Plecanatide (Trulance) — the same receptor target built on uroguanylin rather than the heat-stable enterotoxin scaffold, with the same paediatric contraindication.

Reflux & GORD

Stomach contents refluxing into the oesophagus — extremely common, usually benign, and directly worsened by the most-used drug class in this library. It matters mainly because of what it can hide and what it can become.

6 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    A predictable consequence rather than a side effect. GLP-1 agonists delay gastric emptying — that is part of how they work — and a stomach that empties slowly refluxes more. Reflux, nausea and vomiting are common early and usually settle with slower titration. Two things not to accept without assessment: new or worsening difficulty swallowing, and food regurgitated hours after eating. Also relevant for anaesthesia — tell the anaesthetist, because retained stomach contents despite fasting is a recognised aspiration risk and guidance on withholding doses before procedures now exists.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same mechanism, same advice.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Amylin analogues slow gastric emptying independently of the incretin effect. In a combination, two components are doing it at once.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Heavily marketed for reflux, gastritis and “gut healing”. The objection is the one set out under gastric and oesophageal cancer: reflux symptoms that respond to something and then return are the classic history of a cancer diagnosed late. Alarm features need endoscopy, not treatment.

  • Linaclotide Study

    Approved for constipation-predominant IBS, not for reflux. Included because upper and lower GI symptoms get conflated in self-treatment.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in models. Reflux is a mechanical and acid problem before it is an inflammatory one.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Most reflux is a barrier problem, and the effective measures are unfashionable. Weight loss where relevant — which has some of the best evidence of anything here. Avoiding large meals within three hours of lying down. Raising the head of the bed for night symptoms. Reducing alcohol, smoking and the individual triggers that actually matter to that person rather than a generic list. Proton pump inhibitors work well, and the fears about long-term use have been substantially overstated relative to the evidence — though the real problem with them is different and is covered below.

The genuine hazard is masking. A PPI controls symptoms well enough to postpone investigation indefinitely, and undiagnosed reflux over years drives Barrett’s oesophagus — a change in the oesophageal lining that is the precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Barrett’s is surveilled, and dysplasia within it is treated endoscopically, which prevents the cancer. That is only possible if someone knows the Barrett’s is there. Alarm features requiring endoscopy rather than a prescription: difficulty or pain swallowing, unintentional weight loss, vomiting, anaemia, a mass, and new persistent symptoms over about 55.

For this readership specifically: heavy lifting with Valsalva raises intra-abdominal pressure and provokes reflux; large late meals are structurally built into most bulking approaches; and high body fat around the abdomen worsens it mechanically. Persistent cough, hoarseness, throat clearing and dental erosion can all be reflux presenting atypically. Fundoplication and newer endoscopic procedures exist for people with proven reflux who do not want lifelong medication or who fail it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: PPIs, H2 blockers and alginates are the treatments; none is a peptide. The peptides on this page cause reflux rather than treating it.

Alcohol-related & MetALD liver disease

Liver injury from alcohol — and, in the current classification, the very common situation where alcohol and metabolic dysfunction are both contributing. The nomenclature changed for a good reason: most people were never in one box or the other.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Two roles that meet here. It treats the metabolic half of the problem — see MASH — and there is now randomised evidence that it reduces drinking, covered under alcohol use disorder. Neither makes it a treatment for established liver disease, and dosing in cirrhosis is a specialist question.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same metabolic rationale, less alcohol-specific data.

  • Terlipressin Study

    Approved for hepatorenal syndrome — a complication of advanced liver disease, most often decompensated cirrhosis. A hospital drug, with a boxed warning for respiratory failure.

  • Octreotide Study

    Used for acute variceal bleeding by reducing splanchnic blood flow. Again a complication of the cirrhosis, not a treatment for the liver.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    The single most heavily marketed compound to this population, and the argument is more seductive than most. Hepatic glutathione depletion in alcohol-related liver injury is real biochemistry — and N-acetylcysteine, a glutathione precursor, is genuinely the antidote in paracetamol poisoning, which gives the whole idea a borrowed credibility. None of that establishes intravenous glutathione as a treatment for alcohol-related liver disease, and no trial supports the infusion-clinic version.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Same channel, same claim structure. Note that alcohol metabolism itself consumes NAD+, which is where the mechanistic story comes from and where it stops.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Promoted for liver support. Rodent models only.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing, and relevant only insofar as advanced liver disease causes immune dysfunction and infection risk. Not studied here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The classification changed in 2023, and it is more honest than what it replaced. Steatotic liver disease is now divided into MASLD (metabolic dysfunction, minimal alcohol), ALD (alcohol-predominant), and MetALD in between — metabolic dysfunction plus moderate drinking, defined as roughly 140–350 g of alcohol per week for women and 210–420 g for men. The old binary forced a false choice, and a great many people have both drivers at once, each amplifying the other. Being told your liver problem is “not alcohol” never meant alcohol was irrelevant.

The treatment for the alcohol component is stopping, and the liver’s capacity to recover is genuinely remarkable — steatosis reverses in weeks, and even significant fibrosis can improve over years of abstinence. That makes this one of the more rewarding things to treat, and it is why the medications and support described under alcohol use disorder belong here rather than being treated as a separate problem. Abrupt withdrawal in someone dependent is dangerous and needs medical support.

Alcohol-related hepatitis is the acute emergency — jaundice, tender liver and systemic illness after heavy drinking, with a substantial short-term mortality. It needs hospital assessment; corticosteroids help a defined subgroup. Otherwise the priorities are: assessing fibrosis non-invasively rather than assuming; screening for varices in cirrhosis; six-monthly ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma once cirrhosis is present; nutritional support, because malnutrition is common and under-treated; and thiamine.

Two things that are widely misunderstood. Liver blood tests are frequently normal in significant liver disease — normal ALT does not exclude fibrosis, and fibrosis scoring or elastography is the way to look. And liver transplantation is available to people with alcohol-related liver disease, including in some programmes without a fixed abstinence period, which is a change from the older orthodoxy and worth knowing because people rule themselves out.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved drug treats the liver disease itself. Terlipressin and octreotide treat its complications, and both are peptides.

NSAID gastropathy & gastric ulceration

The original context for BPC-157 research — it was isolated from gastric juice and first characterised as a gastroprotective agent.

2 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent studies report protection against NSAID-induced gastric lesions and accelerated ulcer healing. This is the closest the compound comes to a coherent evidence base, and it remains preclinical.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Tissue-remodelling rationale extended to mucosa.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Proton pump inhibitors, Helicobacter pylori eradication where present, and stopping or substituting the NSAID. These are inexpensive, well-studied and effective. A person taking a research peptide to tolerate an NSAID they could stop is solving the wrong problem.

Group 04

Neurological & psychiatric

The Russian-developed peptides sit here and bring an unusual evidence problem: real clinical use over decades, in a literature that is largely untranslated, unblinded and unreplicated outside its country of origin.

Cognitive decline & general neurodegeneration

A field with a long record of mechanistically attractive interventions failing in trials. Scepticism here is earned rather than reflexive. For the specific disease and the drugs that now exist for it, see Alzheimer’s disease.

11 compounds documented
  • Semax Theorized

    ACTH(4–10) analogue with BDNF-modulating activity; used clinically in Russia in cognitive and cerebrovascular indications. Trials are small and largely unblinded.

  • Adamax Theorized

    A Semax-family analogue with an even thinner evidence base — essentially none outside supplier claims.

  • Selank Theorized

    Anxiolytic; cognition claims are secondary to the anxiolytic effect.

  • Semax + Selank Anecdotal

    A community pairing rather than a formulated product.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Neuroprotective against amyloid toxicity in cell models — one of the more genuinely interesting preclinical stories in this library, with nothing human behind it.

  • SS-31 Study

    Human trials exist, in mitochondrial disease rather than dementia. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a plausible neurodegeneration mechanism.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    NAD+ decline with age is documented; that injectable repletion improves cognition is not.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Telomerase and pineal claims from a small Russian literature. Extended to cognition by association.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Metabolic and mitochondrial framing.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is implicated in neuronal survival. It is also implicated in cancer, which is the trade-off nobody discussing this raises.

  • Semaglutide Study

    EVOKE and EVOKE+ tested this directly in 3,808 people with early Alzheimer disease and found no benefit over placebo at 104 weeks. Together with the negative Exenatide-PD3 trial in Parkinson disease, the incretin neuroprotection hypothesis has now failed at phase 3 twice, in two diseases, despite supportive epidemiology and mechanism in both.

What actually has evidence for this condition

For established Alzheimer's: cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and the anti-amyloid monoclonals with their real but modest effect and their non-trivial ARIA risk. For risk reduction, the evidence is unfashionable and consistent — treating hypertension in midlife, hearing aids for hearing loss, physical activity, sleep, glycaemic control, social and cognitive engagement, and not smoking. The FINGER trial multidomain approach is the best-supported prevention model available.

Alzheimer’s disease

The commonest cause of dementia, defined by amyloid plaques and tau tangles. And the second condition in this library where the target is a peptide and the successful drugs are antibodies against it — the same shape as migraine, with far more modest results.

9 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    The definitive negative result, and it is recent. EVOKE and EVOKE+ tested semaglutide directly in 3,808 people with early Alzheimer’s disease over 104 weeks and found no benefit over placebo. The epidemiology was supportive, the mechanism was plausible, the trial was large and well run, and the answer was no. Anyone still selling the incretin neuroprotection story is selling something that has been tested.

  • Insulin & analogues Theorized

    The route is the entire argument here. Brain insulin resistance is a real feature of Alzheimer’s, and injected insulin cannot reach the brain in useful quantity — which is why the trials use the intranasal route to bypass the blood-brain barrier. Results across the SNIFF programme have been mixed and confounded by delivery-device problems, with small positive signals on cognitive and biomarker endpoints and nothing definitive. It is a serious research question. It is also not something anyone should attempt at home: subcutaneous insulin in a person without diabetes causes hypoglycaemia, not cognition.

  • Humanin Theorized

    A mitochondrial-derived peptide that is protective against amyloid toxicity in cell models — genuinely one of the more interesting preclinical stories in this library, and it was discovered in an Alzheimer’s brain. There is nothing human behind it.

  • Semax Theorized

    ACTH(4–10) analogue with BDNF-modulating activity, used clinically in Russia in cognitive indications. Trials are small and largely unblinded, and none is in Alzheimer’s specifically.

  • SS-31 Study

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is a genuine feature of the disease. Elamipretide has human trials — in mitochondrial myopathy and heart failure, not dementia — and missed its primary endpoints in three of them.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is implicated in neuronal survival, and also in cancer. The trade-off is never raised by anyone recommending it, and the epidemiology on IGF-1 and dementia risk points in both directions depending on the study.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    NAD+ decline with age is documented; that injectable repletion improves cognition is not. Marketed heavily to this population and to their families.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Telomerase and pineal claims from a small Russian literature, extended to dementia by association.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Same mitochondrial-derived peptide family as humanin, same absence of human data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Amyloid-beta is a peptide — a 40 to 42 residue fragment cleaved out of a larger protein — and the drugs that finally worked are monoclonal antibodies that clear it. Lecanemab (Leqembi, approved July 2023) slowed cognitive decline by around 27% against placebo; donanemab (Kisunla, approved July 2024) by around 35%. Both are for early symptomatic disease with amyloid confirmed, both are given by infusion, and both carry a real risk of ARIA — amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, meaning brain swelling and microhaemorrhage — which requires MRI monitoring and is more common and more dangerous in APOE4 homozygotes.

Read those percentages carefully, because they are the most misreported numbers in medicine. A 27% slowing of decline is not 27% better, and it is not improvement. Patients still decline; they decline somewhat more slowly. Whether the difference is large enough to notice in a life is genuinely debated among neurologists, and that debate is legitimate rather than nihilism. What is not debated is that after three decades of failure, drugs that modify the disease now exist.

The bigger practical change is diagnostic. The FDA cleared the first blood-based biomarker tests in 2025 — plasma p-tau217 and amyloid ratio assays — which moves confirmation of amyloid pathology out of PET scanners and specialist centres and into ordinary clinics. Diagnosis is shifting earlier and milder as a result. Prevention trials in cognitively normal people with elevated amyloid (AHEAD 3-45, TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 3) are running on the back of it.

For everything else: cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine remain symptomatic options. And the risk-reduction evidence is unfashionable, unprofitable and consistent — treating hypertension in midlife, hearing aids for hearing loss, physical activity, sleep, glycaemic control, social and cognitive engagement, and not smoking. The FINGER multidomain trial is the best-supported prevention model there is. None of it is purchasable in a vial.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Lecanemab and donanemab are monoclonal antibodies against a peptide, not peptide drugs. Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are small molecules.

Epilepsy & seizure disorders

This entry is the inverse of every other one on this page. The useful content is not what in this library might help — essentially nothing does — but what in it can plausibly make seizures worse, and what happens when someone stops a working anti-seizure medicine to try something else.

7 compounds documented
  • Desmopressin Study

    The clearest documented hazard here, and it is on its own page. Desmopressin causes water retention, water retention causes hyponatraemia, and hyponatraemia lowers the seizure threshold and can cause seizures outright. This is the mechanism behind its boxed warning, not a theoretical concern. Anyone with epilepsy is the last person who should be experimenting with it.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    Same category of hazard by a different route: hypoglycaemia causes seizures. Insulin in someone without diabetes, or mistimed insulin in someone with it, is a direct seizure risk and one of the reversible causes checked first when someone presents fitting.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    A monoamine reuptake inhibitor. Stimulant and pro-monoaminergic agents are a recognised class concern for seizure threshold, and this one has no epilepsy safety data at all.

  • Leuprolide Theorized

    The one entry with a real historical rationale. Catamenial epilepsy — seizures clustering with the menstrual cycle — is a genuine phenomenon, and GnRH analogues were investigated for it decades ago. The evidence never became convincing, the side-effect burden of induced hypo-oestrogenism is substantial, and this is a specialist decision.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Russian-literature neuroprotection claims, occasionally extended to seizure disorders. No controlled evidence, and it is an ACTH fragment — which is interesting given what full-length ACTH does in infantile spasms, and not evidence of anything.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Community claims of neurological benefit. No seizure data in either direction, which means it is untested rather than safe.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed by infusion clinics for neurological complaints generally. No epilepsy evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

There is an approved peptide for one epilepsy syndrome, and it is an old one. ACTH — adrenocorticotropic hormone, a 39-amino-acid peptide — is a first-line treatment for infantile spasms, and has been for decades despite its mechanism never being fully explained. Vigabatrin is the other, particularly in tuberous sclerosis. Infantile spasms are a neurological emergency where speed of treatment affects developmental outcome.

The brain makes its own anticonvulsant peptides, and that is exactly the problem. Neuropeptide Y and galanin both suppress seizure activity — NPY through Y2 and Y5 receptors reducing glutamate release, galanin through GalR1 — and both are among the better-validated endogenous anti-seizure systems there are. Neither can be given as a drug: peptides degrade rapidly and do not cross the blood-brain barrier in useful amounts. This is the route problem at its most concrete, and the field’s answer is telling — rather than administering the peptides, researchers are pursuing gene therapy and encapsulated cell devices to make the brain produce more of them in situ. Human tissue work has also been sobering: NPY’s effect on glutamate release replicated, galanin’s did not.

Genetic epilepsies are where the real news is. ETX101, an AAV9 gene therapy that raises SCN1A expression in inhibitory interneurons, is delivered once directly into the brain for Dravet syndrome. Phase 1/2 data reported in May 2026 across 21 children showed reduced seizure frequency alongside improvements in adaptive behaviour and cognition, and has been generally well tolerated. Antisense oligonucleotide approaches are being pursued in parallel.

For everyone else, the standard of care is unglamorous and works: the right anti-seizure medicine for the seizure type, taken consistently. Around two thirds of people become seizure-free on medication. Where two appropriate drugs have failed, that is drug-resistant epilepsy and it is a trigger for referral — epilepsy surgery is curative in selected patients and is chronically under-used, as are neurostimulation and the ketogenic diet, which has genuine randomised evidence in refractory childhood epilepsy.

The safety point that matters more than any compound listed above: anti-seizure medicines should not be stopped or altered to accommodate anything on this site. Abrupt withdrawal can precipitate status epilepticus. Several of these drugs also have significant interactions — enzyme inducers reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraception, and valproate causes major foetal harm and requires a pregnancy prevention programme in anyone who could become pregnant. Driving rules apply and vary by jurisdiction. SUDEP — sudden unexpected death in epilepsy — is real, and the best-established modifiable risk factor for it is uncontrolled generalised tonic-clonic seizures. That is the arithmetic behind treating this condition conservatively.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: ACTH for infantile spasms is the peptide. Everything else in routine use is a small molecule, a device, a diet or surgery.

Multiple sclerosis

Immune-mediated demyelination and axonal loss in the central nervous system, most often relapsing-remitting at onset and progressive later. Also the condition with the strangest approved peptide drug in medicine.

7 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The direction problem, and MS is a good place to state it plainly: every approved use of this compound depends on enhancing immune response, and MS is treated by suppressing or redirecting it. Several MS disease-modifying therapies work by depleting or sequestering lymphocytes. Anyone on one should treat this as an interaction question for their neurologist.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to axonal degeneration in progressive MS, which is a real mechanistic hypothesis. Its own trial record — three randomised failures in populations with demonstrable mitochondrial pathology — is the reason to hold it lightly.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed for neurological repair on the strength of rodent nerve injury models. Peripheral nerve is not central myelin, and there is no MS evidence.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used for fatigue and cognitive symptoms, which are genuinely among the most disabling features of MS. No evidence in the condition.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Tissue-protective erythropoietin-derived signalling, with the neuroprotection rationale that made erythropoietin itself interesting before its trials disappointed.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in autoimmune mechanisms generally. As in psoriasis and lupus, that makes it part of the problem rather than a candidate solution.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed to this population for fatigue by infusion clinics, with no controlled evidence in MS.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The approved peptide drug for MS is stranger than anything in this library, and it works. Glatiramer acetate — copolymer-1, Copaxone — is not a defined molecule at all: it is a random polymer of four amino acids (glutamic acid, lysine, alanine and tyrosine) in fixed proportions but variable sequence and length, so no two molecules in a vial are necessarily identical. It has been approved for relapsing-remitting MS since the 1990s. Its proposed mechanism is promiscuous binding to MHC molecules, competing with myelin antigens for presentation to T cells, alongside a shift toward Th2 responses and restoration of regulatory T cells. A deliberately undefined mixture, with a mechanism described in terms of what it crowds out, holding an approval for three decades — it is a useful corrective to the idea that a peptide drug must be an elegant single molecule.

Modern MS care is otherwise about early, effective disease modification: the anti-CD20 antibodies, natalizumab, S1P modulators, cladribine, and the older injectables including glatiramer and the interferons. Treating early and effectively matters, because relapse-related disability accumulates and is not recovered. Vitamin D repletion, smoking cessation and exercise all affect the course. Symptom management — spasticity, bladder, fatigue, neuropathic pain, mood — is where much of the quality-of-life gain sits and is frequently under-addressed.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Glatiramer acetate is the peptide. The rest — anti-CD20 antibodies, natalizumab, S1P modulators, cladribine, interferon beta — are not.

Parkinson’s disease

Progressive loss of dopaminergic neurones in the substantia nigra with alpha-synuclein pathology, producing bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor and a long list of non-motor features. Nothing in routine use slows the underlying process — which is why the incretin story here attracted so much attention, and why it deserves telling in full.

8 compounds documented
  • Exenatide Study

    The negative phase 3. Exenatide-PD3 randomised 194 people with Parkinson’s over 96 weeks, double-blind and placebo-controlled, and found no benefit and no slowing of progression — published in The Lancet in February 2025. The authors noted the result was discordant with the earlier laboratory, epidemiological and phase 2 findings.

  • Liraglutide Theorized

    Class member without a Parkinson’s trial of its own. Included because the class question is now the interesting one rather than any individual agent.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Relevant by analogy rather than directly. Its own neurodegeneration trials — EVOKE and EVOKE+ in Alzheimer’s disease, 3,808 participants — were also negative, which makes two large phase 3 failures of the incretin neuroprotection hypothesis in two different diseases.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is a long-standing hypothesis in Parkinson’s — the MPTP story that first linked complex I inhibition to parkinsonism is one of the cleaner mechanistic narratives in neurology. Elamipretide has not been tested here, and has missed its primary endpoints in three other trials.

  • Glutathione Study

    Nigral glutathione depletion is among the earliest identified biochemical changes in Parkinson’s, which made it an obvious target. Intravenous and intranasal glutathione were studied and did not establish clinical benefit — a clean example of a documented tissue deficiency not being correctable by supplying the depleted molecule systemically.

  • Semax Theorized

    Neurotrophic framing from the Russian literature. No Parkinson’s trial.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    NAD+ precursor trials in Parkinson’s have been run and have not delivered a clear answer. The SARM1 axonal degeneration pathway is genuinely serious science, and it is being targeted by SARM1 inhibitors rather than by flooding the system with substrate.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Mitochondrial-derived peptide with neuroprotection in cell models. Nothing human.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The two-trial story here is the most instructive thing in this library about how drug evidence works, and it happened inside one drug class in one disease.

In 2024, the LixiPark phase 2 trial randomised 156 people with early Parkinson’s to daily lixisenatide or placebo for twelve months. It reported less progression of motor disability on treatment, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, with gastrointestinal side effects as expected. Genuine excitement followed.

In February 2025, Exenatide-PD3 — a different GLP-1 agonist, 194 participants, 96 weeks rather than 52, phase 3 rather than phase 2 — reported no benefit whatsoever. Same class, same disease, same hypothesis, opposite answer at the higher level of evidence.

That is now the fourth appearance of this pattern on this site, alongside semaglutide in Alzheimer’s, rigerimod in lupus, and exenatide itself. A positive phase 2 is a reason to run a phase 3. It is not a reason to believe the result.

For actual treatment: levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic therapy and the old advice to delay it has not held up. Dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors, apomorphine and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for fluctuations, and deep brain stimulation in selected patients. Exercise has among the best evidence of any non-pharmacological intervention — including for motor outcomes, not just fitness — and is consistently under-prescribed. Physiotherapy, speech and language therapy for voice and swallowing, and management of the non-motor features (constipation, orthostatic hypotension, REM sleep behaviour disorder, depression, and the impulse control disorders that dopamine agonists can cause) account for much of the achievable quality of life.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Levodopa and the dopaminergic classes. None is a peptide, and no disease-modifying therapy exists.

Migraine

A primary headache disorder with a neurovascular mechanism, and — unusually for this library — a field where identifying the right neuropeptide produced a genuinely transformative class of drugs. That makes it the best available example of what a peptide target looks like when the science works.

5 compounds documented
  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Not a migraine compound. Included because migraine is strongly sex-hormone-linked, oestrogen withdrawal is a well-documented trigger, and the hypothalamic circuitry involved overlaps with the KNDy biology described in the menopause entry.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used for headache and cognitive symptoms in the Russian tradition. No migraine evidence.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Appears in headache discussion. No plausible mechanism and no evidence.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect. Obesity is a risk factor for migraine chronification, and weight loss is associated with improvement in chronic migraine. A metabolic route rather than a neurological one. GLP-1 agonists have also been explored in idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which is a different headache disorder frequently confused with migraine.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed by infusion clinics for headache. No controlled evidence, and infusion settings produce large placebo effects in pain conditions.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The lesson of migraine is what a correctly identified peptide target does. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a 37-amino-acid neuropeptide released from trigeminal sensory neurones, and it is elevated during migraine attacks. Blocking it produced two drug classes and changed the field:

The monoclonal antibodies — erenumab, which binds the CGRP receptor, and fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab, which bind the peptide itself — are given monthly or quarterly for prevention. The gepants — rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant — are small molecules antagonising the same receptor, used for acute treatment and, for some, prevention. Note what happened there: the peptide was the target, and the successful drugs are an antibody against it and a small molecule blocking its receptor. Nobody administers CGRP.

And the next neuropeptide target has already reported. PACAP — pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide — is implicated in migraine independently of CGRP. An anti-PACAP antibody produced a significant reduction in monthly migraine days against placebo in a phase 2 trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine, with positive phase 2b data following. A second peptide target, validated the same way: by blocking it.

Alongside those: triptans and the ditan lasmiditan for acute attacks, and the older preventives — propranolol, topiramate, amitriptyline, candesartan — which remain effective and inexpensive. Medication overuse headache is the most commonly missed cause of headache getting worse, and it is caused by the acute treatments. Identifying triggers, regular sleep, hydration and treating comorbid depression all matter.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: The CGRP antibodies and gepants, triptans and lasmiditan. The peptide here is the target, not the drug.

Stroke recovery & traumatic brain injury

The acute window is measured in hours and belongs entirely to emergency medicine. Everything below concerns the recovery phase.

6 compounds documented
  • Semax Theorized

    The indication it is actually used for in Russia, in the acute and subacute ischaemic stroke setting. The trial quality does not meet the standard that would be required for approval elsewhere.

  • Selank Theorized

    Post-stroke anxiety and mood rather than neurological recovery.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent TBI models.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial protection in ischaemia-reperfusion models.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    An erythropoietin-derived peptide designed to keep the tissue-protective effect without the haematopoietic one — the rationale that made erythropoietin itself interesting in stroke before the trials disappointed.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Neuroprotection in cell models.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Thrombolysis and thrombectomy within their time windows; stroke-unit care, which independently improves outcomes; secondary prevention with antiplatelets, blood-pressure control and lipid lowering; and intensive, early, repetitive rehabilitation, which remains the highest-yield recovery-phase intervention by a wide margin. Time is brain — any delay to emergency care in favour of anything on this page costs recoverable tissue.

Peripheral & diabetic neuropathy

Small-fibre damage from metabolic, chemotherapeutic or inflammatory causes. Pain and loss of sensation are different problems with different implications.

7 compounds documented
  • ARA-290 Study

    The strongest entry in this section: reached randomised human trials in sarcoidosis-associated small-fibre neuropathy and in type 2 diabetes, with reported improvements in corneal nerve fibre measures and symptom scores.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent nerve injury models.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Animal nerve regeneration work.

  • Semax Theorized

    Neurotrophic framing.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is implicated in chemotherapy-induced and diabetic neuropathy.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Metabolic rationale in the diabetic form.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Glycaemic control is the intervention that alters the course of diabetic neuropathy; this is the mechanism by which the incretins are relevant here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

In diabetic neuropathy, glycaemic control is the only intervention that changes the disease trajectory — everything else treats pain. For pain: duloxetine, pregabalin, gabapentin, amitriptyline, topical capsaicin. Foot care and screening prevent the outcome that actually costs people limbs. Address B12 deficiency, alcohol and thyroid disease before assuming a diabetic cause.

Anxiety, depression & stress

Where community peptide use most often substitutes for treatment that works, in people who are unwell enough for that substitution to matter.

7 compounds documented
  • Selank Theorized

    Tuftsin analogue with anxiolytic activity in animal models and small Russian clinical work, framed as benzodiazepine-like without dependence.

  • Semax Theorized

    BDNF modulation; the antidepressant argument runs through the same pathway SSRIs are thought to touch downstream.

  • Semax + Selank Anecdotal

    Used together on a stimulating-plus-calming rationale.

  • DSIP Theorized

    Sleep architecture, and through it mood. The original human work is from the 1970s and 1980s and is not robust.

  • Adamax Anecdotal

    Supplier claims, no literature.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Sleep and circadian claims by way of the pineal framing.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Relevant in the other direction. Reports of suicidal ideation prompted regulatory review, and the FDA subsequently concluded there was no increased risk and requested removal of the suicidal behaviour and ideation warning from GLP-1 labelling. Disproportionate reporting persists in pharmacovigilance databases, which is what those databases do; the controlled evidence did not support a causal link.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Cognitive behavioural therapy has the strongest evidence base of any intervention for anxiety disorders and is comparable to medication for depression of mild to moderate severity. SSRIs and SNRIs, exercise with a genuine effect size, sleep, and treatment of alcohol use where present. If symptoms include thoughts of self-harm, that is an emergency and belongs with a person, not a vial.

Smoking cessation & nicotine dependence

Nicotine dependence is maintained through mesolimbic dopamine signalling. Quitting produces an average weight gain of several kilograms, and fear of that gain is a measured barrier to attempting cessation and a measured cause of relapse — which is the specific gap this drug class may fill.

7 compounds documented
  • Exenatide Study

    The positive trial. Extended-release exenatide alongside a 21 mg nicotine patch and counselling produced abstinence of 46.3% against 26.8%, with reduced craving and withdrawal.

  • Dulaglutide Study

    The null trial, and the more instructive one. Alongside varenicline and counselling, abstinence was 63% against 65% — no difference — while weight went −4.6 kg against +0.5 kg on placebo. It did not help people quit; it solved the problem that stops many people trying.

  • Semaglutide Study

    A large target trial emulation in type 2 diabetes found lower risk of tobacco-dependence encounters against all seven comparator antidiabetic drugs. The investigators stated explicitly that the limitations preclude firm conclusions and that the result should not be read as justifying off-label use.

  • Liraglutide Theorized

    Class inference. No smoking cessation trial for this agent.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Class inference, with the GIP arm adding nothing known to this question.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Class inference only, and unapproved for anything.

  • Orforglipron Theorized

    Same receptor, oral route. No cessation data, and the newest agent in the class.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Varenicline has the largest effect size of any single smoking cessation agent, followed by combination nicotine replacement — a patch for background plus a fast-acting form for cravings — and bupropion. Cytisinicline is an option where varenicline is unavailable. Behavioural support roughly doubles the odds of success on top of any pharmacotherapy, and it is the component most often skipped.

Nothing in the GLP-1 class approaches those effect sizes, and no trial has tested a GLP-1 as a substitute for any of them — in both randomised trials the GLP-1 was added on top of an established treatment. The whole randomised evidence base here is roughly 410 participants across three studies.

Where the class does have a consistent finding is the weight, not the quitting. Post-cessation weight gain averages several kilograms, is a documented reason people decline to try, and is a documented cause of relapse. An agent that removes that obstacle while someone uses a treatment that actually works is a coherent proposition — and it is a narrower claim than the one usually made.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement and cytisinicline are the approved options; none is a peptide.

Alcohol & substance use disorder

Compulsive use despite harm — and, unexpectedly, one of the more promising directions for the incretin class, with randomised evidence that is now genuinely worth reporting rather than merely noting.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Real randomised data, and it keeps replicating. A 2025 randomised trial in 48 adults with alcohol use disorder found low-dose semaglutide reduced alcohol consumed in a laboratory self-administration task, with medium-to-large effect sizes. A 2026 randomised trial in 108 adults with moderate-to-severe alcohol use disorder and obesity — all receiving cognitive behavioural therapy — found heavy drinking days fell by 41.1 percentage points on semaglutide against 26.4 on placebo over 26 weeks. A separate randomised trial of oral semaglutide reported consistent findings. Keep the tier honest: these are small, short, and not phase 3, and this site has documented repeatedly what happens to promising phase 2 results. But this is randomised, replicated, mechanistically coherent, and moving toward larger trials — which is more than almost anything else in this library can say.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same class rationale, less alcohol-specific trial data. The mechanism is thought to run through mesolimbic reward signalling rather than through the gut.

  • Liraglutide Theorized

    Earlier class member, some supportive signals, superseded by the semaglutide trials.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    No addiction role. Included because alcohol suppresses the reproductive axis, and heavy drinking is a genuine and reversible cause of low testosterone that gets attributed to other things.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used in the Russian literature and in community practice for withdrawal and craving. No controlled evidence in addiction.

  • Selank Anecdotal

    Anxiolytic framing applied to withdrawal-related anxiety. Same absence of evidence, and alcohol withdrawal is not a condition to self-manage — see below.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed aggressively for addiction recovery by infusion clinics, at high cost, with no controlled evidence. “NAD+ detox” programmes are sold to people at their most vulnerable and least able to evaluate the claim. The absence of evidence here is not a technicality.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Same channel, same claim structure, same absence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

A safety point first, because it is genuinely dangerous. Alcohol withdrawal in someone physically dependent can cause seizures and delirium tremens, which has a real mortality rate. Stopping abruptly without medical support is hazardous — unlike most substances, where withdrawal is unpleasant rather than life-threatening. Medically supported detoxification with benzodiazepines and thiamine is the safe route. High-dose thiamine matters because Wernicke’s encephalopathy is preventable and, once missed, causes permanent memory damage.

The approved medications work and are dramatically under-prescribed. For alcohol: naltrexone and acamprosate, both with solid trial evidence, both cheap, both offered to a small minority of people who would benefit. Disulfiram in supervised settings. For opioids, buprenorphine and methadone reduce mortality substantially — this is among the best-evidenced interventions in medicine and remains contested for reasons that are not clinical. Naloxone reverses overdose and should be available to anyone at risk and to those around them.

Psychosocial treatment works alongside medication rather than instead of it: cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational interviewing, contingency management — which has the strongest evidence for stimulant use disorder and is barely implemented — and mutual aid groups, which help many people and are free. Treating the frequent companions matters too: depression, anxiety, PTSD, ADHD and chronic pain all drive use and all respond to treatment.

Relevant to this readership: anabolic steroid dependence is real and recognised, and withdrawal produces depression, fatigue and loss of libido that can be prolonged and is a genuine risk period. Alcohol is also a direct and underappreciated driver of several conditions covered on this site — atrial fibrillation, hypertension, liver disease, head and neck cancer, gout and disturbed sleep. The GLP-1 data above is interesting partly because it may act on all of that at once, and partly because it is being tested properly, which is not the norm in this field.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Naltrexone, acamprosate, buprenorphine and methadone are approved and effective. None is a peptide, and the peptide class here is investigational.

ADHD & attention

Dysregulation of catecholamine signalling in prefrontal and striatal circuits governing attention, working memory and inhibitory control. It is diagnosable, and it has some of the most effective pharmacotherapy in psychiatry.

5 compounds documented
  • Semax Theorized

    Used in Russian paediatric practice for attention and cognitive problems, with monoaminergic and BDNF effects that make the rationale coherent. No controlled trial in ADHD, and nothing published outside Russia and neighbouring states.

  • Adamax Anecdotal

    Marketed for focus with no published literature under that name at all. Every claim is read across from Semax, which itself has no Western trial evidence.

  • Selank Theorized

    Anxiety degrades working memory by consuming attentional capacity, so treating it can improve attention without acting on attention. That is a real mechanism and a different claim from treating ADHD.

  • Semax + Selank Anecdotal

    The common community pairing for focus. No study has examined it for anything.

  • CJC-1295 (no DAC) Anecdotal

    Appears in nootropic stacking discussion. Nothing connects GH secretagogues to attention.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Stimulants — methylphenidate and the amphetamines — have among the largest effect sizes of any treatment in psychiatry, and atomoxetine, guanfacine and clonidine are the non-stimulant options. Behavioural and organisational strategies, and accommodations at work or in education, add to medication rather than competing with it.

The first step is an assessment, and it is the step most often skipped. ADHD symptoms overlap substantially with sleep deprivation, obstructive sleep apnoea, thyroid disease, anxiety, depression, and iron deficiency — all of which are common, all treatable, and none improved by a nootropic. A diagnostic assessment costs less than a year of unassessed peptides and produces access to treatments that actually work.

Depression

A common, disabling and treatable condition. Reduced BDNF signalling is among the more durable findings in the research literature, which is why compounds acting on that pathway attract interest — and why a long line of them has failed at trial.

7 compounds documented
  • Semax Theorized

    BDNF modulation, which is a pathway genuinely implicated in mood disorder and thought to be downstream of what SSRIs do. No controlled trial in depression exists.

  • Selank Theorized

    Anxiolytic with reported antiasthenic and mildly activating effects — relevant because anxiety and depression are comorbid far more often than not, and because fatigue is poorly served by sedating agents.

  • Semax + Selank Theorized

    The community pairing, on a stimulating-plus-calming rationale. Rapid subjective mood lift is the usual report, and it arrives faster than any BDNF-mediated mechanism plausibly acts.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Relevant for safety rather than benefit. Reports of suicidal ideation prompted regulatory review, and the FDA subsequently concluded there was no increased risk and requested removal of the warning from GLP-1 labelling. Weight loss also has genuine effects on mood in both directions.

  • DSIP Theorized

    Sleep and mood are bidirectional, and non-restorative sleep is a core depressive symptom. DSIP was rejected by the PCAC and has no identified receptor.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Circadian framing extended to mood by association.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed heavily by infusion clinics for mood and fatigue, with no controlled evidence in depression.

What actually has evidence for this condition

If you are having thoughts of harming yourself, that is an emergency and it belongs with a person rather than a vial. Crisis lines and emergency departments exist for exactly this and are the right call.

Cognitive behavioural therapy is comparable to medication for mild to moderate depression and its benefit outlasts the treatment, which medication’s does not. SSRIs and SNRIs are first-line pharmacotherapy; where two adequate trials have failed, augmentation, switching, esketamine and electroconvulsive therapy all have evidence, and ECT remains the most effective treatment available for severe or treatment-resistant depression despite its reputation. Exercise has a genuine effect size. Treating comorbid alcohol use and sleep disorder changes outcomes more than most people expect, and both are routinely left unaddressed.

Autism

A developmental difference in social communication, sensory processing and patterns of interest. There is no pharmacological treatment for the core features — and this is the condition in this library with the longest record of peptides being sold as though there were.

5 compounds documented
  • Oxytocin Study

    The largest and most rigorous trial was negative. SOARS-B randomised 290 children and adolescents with autism to 24 weeks of daily intranasal oxytocin or placebo and — published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2021 — found no significant difference from placebo on its primary social-withdrawal endpoint or on its secondary social and cognitive measures. Smaller pilots reported benefit, particularly designs pairing infrequent dosing with structured social interaction, and that remains unconfirmed at scale.

  • Desmopressin Theorized

    Included for the vasopressin connection rather than as a candidate. The vasopressin system was a serious autism target: balovaptan, a V1a receptor antagonist, failed a phase 3 trial in adults and a phase 2 trial in children, and the adult trial was stopped early when interim analysis showed it was unlikely to succeed.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used off-label in the Russian tradition for developmental and cognitive indications. No autism trial.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Sold on gut-brain-axis reasoning. There is no controlled evidence in autism for this or any other repair peptide.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Same gut-axis framing, same absence of evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The cautionary tale here is a peptide, and it is worth knowing in full. In the late 1990s secretin — a gastrointestinal hormone — became a widely publicised autism treatment after anecdotal reports of dramatic improvement. It was then tested properly. A Cochrane review covering 16 randomised placebo-controlled trials in around 900 children found no evidence of benefit on any core feature. Bumetanide followed a similar path more recently: two phase 3 trials failed and the sponsor discontinued development. The pattern — compelling anecdote, enormous demand, unambiguous negative trials — is the single best argument for the evidence tiers this site is built on.

What has support: individualised, evidence-based educational and communication support, occupational therapy where sensory needs interfere with daily life, and speech and language therapy. Medication has a real role for co-occurring conditions — ADHD, anxiety, depression, epilepsy, sleep disorder, gastrointestinal problems — which are common, frequently under-treated, and often the source of the distress that gets attributed to autism itself. Treating those well is the intervention with the best evidence and the least attention.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Risperidone and aripiprazole are approved for irritability associated with autism — a specific behavioural target, not the core features.

Bipolar disorder

Episodes of mania or hypomania alternating with depression. It is on this site for one safety reason above all — it usually presents as depression, and treating that depression without recognising the bipolarity can precipitate mania.

6 compounds documented
  • Semax Anecdotal

    The specific hazard. Stimulating and antidepressant-like compounds — whether prescribed antidepressants, nootropics, or anything with activating effects — can trigger a manic or hypomanic episode in someone with bipolar disorder, including someone who does not yet know they have it. This is not a theoretical concern; antidepressant-induced mania is well documented, which is why psychiatrists screen for a history of elevated mood before prescribing. Nobody screens before selling a nootropic.

  • Selank Anecdotal

    Anxiolytic framing rather than activating, but the same absence of evidence and the same lack of any screening.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    Monoamine reuptake inhibition — pharmacologically the most activating compound in this library, and stimulants and monoaminergic drugs are recognised precipitants of mania.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Infusion clinics market these preparations for mood and energy. Sleep disruption alone can precipitate an episode, and infusions marketed for energy are aimed at exactly the population most likely to have undiagnosed mood disorder.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Relevant for the interactions rather than the disease. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic index and is affected by fluid balance and kidney function — vomiting, dehydration or significant weight change can raise levels into toxicity. Anyone on lithium starting an incretin needs monitoring, not assumption. Many psychiatric drugs also cause weight gain, which is why this class is increasingly used in this population and why that should be done with the psychiatric team.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    No direct role. Included because people with bipolar disorder have markedly higher rates of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, partly from medication and partly from the illness — and that physical health gap is a leading cause of the reduced life expectancy in this group.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The diagnostic problem is the whole problem. People seek help when depressed, not when hypomanic — hypomania often feels good, productive, and like the person at their best. So bipolar disorder is commonly diagnosed as unipolar depression, frequently for years, and the average delay between first episode and correct diagnosis is measured in years rather than months. Clues worth taking seriously: depression that started young, recurrent episodes, a family history of bipolar disorder, depression that responded to an antidepressant and then stopped working or flipped into agitation, and any period of days of reduced need for sleep with elevated mood and increased activity.

Treatment is mood stabilisation, and the first-line agents are not antidepressants. Lithium remains among the most effective, is uniquely associated with reduced suicide risk, and is under-prescribed partly because it requires monitoring — levels, kidney and thyroid function. Valproate is effective and must not be used in anyone who could become pregnant because of severe teratogenicity, which is subject to formal regulatory restriction. Lamotrigine works better for the depressive pole. Several antipsychotics are effective for both poles. Antidepressants alone are generally avoided, and used only under mood stabiliser cover if at all.

The unglamorous parts do a great deal of work. Regular sleep and a stable daily routine are genuinely protective, because sleep disruption is both a trigger and an early warning — which makes shift work, long-haul travel and all-night training or work patterns real risk factors. Psychoeducation, recognising individual early warning signs, and having a plan agreed in advance for what happens if an episode starts. Alcohol and substance use worsen the course substantially — see substance use. Physical health care is part of treatment, not separate from it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Lithium, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics. None is a peptide, and nothing in this library has been studied in bipolar disorder.

PTSD

A trauma- and stressor-related disorder with intrusive memories, avoidance, hyperarousal and negative changes in mood and cognition. It also supplies this site with a failure mode it had not yet documented — not a phase 2 that died in phase 3, but positive phase 3 trials rejected over how they were run.

6 compounds documented
  • Oxytocin Theorized

    The most-studied peptide here, and the results are genuinely mixed. Intranasal oxytocin has been trialled for fear extinction, social processing and PTSD prevention after trauma, with some early-administration signals and considerable inconsistency between studies. The same delivery question that dogs every intranasal peptide applies — how much reaches the brain, and whether findings replicate. It is not an established treatment, and the approved use of oxytocin is obstetric, covered under postpartum haemorrhage.

  • Selank Anecdotal

    Anxiolytic framing from the Russian literature. No PTSD trials, and the methodological quality of the available work is poor.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Same tradition, same absence.

  • DSIP Anecdotal

    Sleep framing, and sleep disturbance and nightmares are among the most distressing features of PTSD. No identified receptor, rejected by the PCAC, and human evidence from the 1970s and 80s that was small and inconsistent — while an effective, cheap, prescribable option for nightmares exists and is described below.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect. PTSD is associated with substantially increased rates of substance use, obesity and cardiovascular disease, and those are treatable in their own right.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed for trauma and “nervous system reset” by infusion clinics. No evidence, aimed at a population with high distress and, frequently, limited means.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The treatments that work are psychological, and they work well. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy, cognitive processing therapy, prolonged exposure and EMDR all have solid evidence and are recommended first-line internationally. That is worth stating clearly because it inverts the usual expectation — here the psychological treatment outperforms the drugs, and drugs are second-line. SSRIs and venlafaxine have evidence and are used where therapy is unavailable, declined, or insufficient. Benzodiazepines are specifically not recommended — they do not treat PTSD and may impair the extinction learning that therapy depends on.

One practical thing worth knowing: prazosin for nightmares. Trauma-related nightmares and sleep disruption are among the most disabling symptoms, and prazosin — an old, cheap alpha-blocker — helps a meaningful proportion of people. The trial evidence is mixed rather than definitive, and it remains widely used because when it works it works well.

And now the part this library should learn from. MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD produced striking phase 3 results and enormous public expectation. In August 2024 the FDA declined to approve it, issuing a complete response letter and requiring an additional phase 3 trial. The concerns were not that the drug did nothing — they centred on trial conduct, functional unblinding, the difficulty of separating drug from therapy, and data integrity. Three related papers were subsequently retracted from the journal Psychopharmacology, and the sponsor cut roughly 75% of its workforce.

That is a distinct lesson from the phase-2-to-phase-3 pattern documented across this site. Here the phase 3 results were positive, and it still failed — because how a trial is conducted determines whether its result means anything. The research continues, and the eventual answer may still be favourable. But enthusiasm, a compelling mechanism and a positive readout together are not sufficient, and this is the clearest recent demonstration of it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Sertraline and paroxetine are approved for PTSD. The best-evidenced treatments are psychotherapies, and no peptide is approved anywhere.

Obstructive sleep apnoea

Repeated collapse of the upper airway during sleep, causing fragmented sleep, daytime sleepiness and raised cardiovascular risk. In December 2024 it became an approved indication for a compound in this library — the first drug ever approved for it.

8 compounds documented
  • Tirzepatide Study

    Approved for this, and it is the first pharmacological treatment obstructive sleep apnoea has ever had. SURMOUNT-OSA tested tirzepatide in adults with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity and reported a substantial reduction in the apnoea-hypopnoea index — the actual disease measure, not a weight surrogate — in participants both using and not using CPAP. That is the second indication where this compound produced a benefit measured as something other than a number on a scale.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Not approved for OSA, and the mechanism — reducing the fat load on the upper airway and the chest wall — is the same one. It has no equivalent trial with an apnoea-hypopnoea endpoint, which is exactly the distinction this site exists to make.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Largest weight effect in the class and the most likely to help by the same route. No OSA endpoint.

  • Cagrilintide Theorized

    Same reasoning, weaker weight effect alone.

  • DSIP Anecdotal

    Listed as a caution, not a candidate. Anything marketed to deepen sleep is being sold into a condition where the problem is that the airway collapses during sleep. Sedatives and central depressants can worsen obstructive apnoea by reducing upper airway muscle tone and blunting arousal from an obstructive event — and the arousal is what ends the apnoea. Feeling like you slept more deeply is not evidence you breathed.

  • Desmopressin Theorized

    Appears in this space because nocturia is a common and under-recognised OSA symptom — apnoea drives natriuretic peptide release and night-time urine production. Treating the nocturia while leaving the apnoea untreated addresses the symptom that wakes you and none of the risk that matters.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    Visceral fat reduction with a plausible route to airway loading. No OSA data.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No mechanism, no data, appears in general wellness discussion.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Get it diagnosed properly. Home sleep apnoea testing has made this straightforward, and OSA is both very common and very commonly missed — particularly in women, in whom it presents less classically. Untreated moderate-to-severe OSA carries raised risk of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke, type 2 diabetes and road traffic accidents.

CPAP remains the most effective treatment, and the honest problem with it is adherence rather than efficacy — which is why mask fitting, humidification and pressure adjustment are worth persisting with rather than abandoning. Mandibular advancement devices are a genuine alternative in mild-to-moderate disease. Positional therapy helps supine-predominant apnoea. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is an option in selected patients who cannot tolerate CPAP.

Weight loss works, and now has a drug behind it — but note what tirzepatide’s approval does and does not mean. It reduces the severity of the apnoea; it does not necessarily abolish it, and it does not remove the need to re-test. Nobody should stop CPAP on the strength of weight loss without a repeat sleep study.

Alcohol before bed and sedative-hypnotics both worsen obstructive apnoea, and treating co-existing nasal obstruction and reflux helps. Central sleep apnoea is a different condition with different causes, and opioids are a common one.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Tirzepatide is approved for obstructive sleep apnoea with obesity — the only drug approved for the condition anywhere.

Insomnia & sleep architecture

Sleep is where the largest growth-hormone pulses occur, which makes it upstream of a large part of this library rather than adjacent to it.

4 compounds documented
  • DSIP Theorized

    Delta sleep-inducing peptide — named for the effect it was reported to have in rabbits in 1977. The human work that followed was small and inconsistent, and the compound was rejected for the compounding list.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Pineal and melatonin-axis framing.

  • Selank Theorized

    Sleep improvement secondary to anxiolysis.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Anecdotal

    Deeper sleep is among the most consistently reported subjective effects of GH secretagogues — and also among the most placebo-susceptible.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is first-line, outperforms hypnotics at follow-up, and is available in digital form. Sleep restriction therapy, stimulus control, light exposure timing, and screening for obstructive sleep apnoea and restless legs — both routinely missed, both treatable.

Group 05

Immune, autoimmune & infectious

The one section where a compound in this library has genuine approved use in another country, and also the section where "boosting immunity" is most often used to mean nothing in particular. It is also where direction matters most. Thymosin alpha-1 is approved for conditions where the immune response is too weak; most community use is in conditions where it is too strong. And LL-37 is not a candidate treatment in psoriasis or lupus — it is part of how tolerance to self breaks down.

Immunosenescence & immune support

Age-related decline in immune competence, particularly T-cell diversity following thymic involution. A real phenomenon and a heavily marketed one.

6 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Study

    The strongest immune entry here: approved in a number of countries as Zadaxin, with human trial use in hepatitis B, hepatitis C and as a vaccine adjuvant, and investigated in sepsis.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Pineal peptide from a small Russian literature; telomerase claims are frequently overstated.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Innate antimicrobial peptide, part of the vitamin D–cathelicidin axis.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory rather than immune-stimulating — the opposite direction to most claims in this section.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Antioxidant framing; lymphocyte glutathione does decline with age.

  • NAD⁺ Theorized

    Metabolic support of immune-cell function.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Vaccination — particularly influenza, pneumococcal, shingles and COVID boosters in older adults — is the intervention with the largest effect on infectious outcomes in this population, by an enormous margin. Alongside it: correcting vitamin D deficiency, adequate protein, resistance training, sleep, and treating the chronic conditions that drive immune dysfunction.

Chronic viral infection (hepatitis B & C)

Included because it is the indication where a library compound has genuine human trial data and regulatory approval outside the United States.

3 compounds documented
  • Enfuvirtide Study

    Approved HIV fusion inhibitor — a 36-residue peptide that blocks gp41 from folding into the six-helix bundle that pulls the membranes together. It works; it also requires twice-daily injection and causes injection site reactions in 98% of patients, which is why oral agents displaced it.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Study

    Randomised trials in chronic hepatitis B, and use in hepatitis C, generally in combination with interferon. Approved in several countries for this use.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Broad antimicrobial activity including some antiviral effects in vitro.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Hepatitis C is curable with 8–12 weeks of direct-acting antivirals in the great majority of cases. Hepatitis B is suppressible with tenofovir or entecavir and preventable by vaccine. These are among the most effective treatments in all of medicine, and any peptide framing here is decades behind them.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Ibalizumab, and the entry inhibitors maraviroc and fostemsavir, target the same entry process at different steps.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Autoimmune synovitis — symmetrical, small-joint, typically with morning stiffness lasting over an hour — driven by an immune attack on the joint lining that erodes cartilage and bone. It is not osteoarthritis, and confusing the two is the single most consequential error in this section, because the treatments have nothing in common.

8 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Aimed at the wrong disease. The joint claims for this compound come from tendon and soft-tissue repair models. Rheumatoid arthritis is an immune attack, not a repair deficit — a repair agent does not address the driver, and the erosion continues underneath any symptomatic improvement. Intra-articular injection is also a worse idea here than anywhere else on this site, because RA patients are frequently on immunosuppression and a septic joint in that context is more likely and more dangerous.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Same objection, same wrong target.

  • KLOW Anecdotal

    Marketed for joints without distinguishing which joint disease. KPV at least has an anti-inflammatory rationale; nothing in the blend touches the autoimmune mechanism.

  • KPV Theorized

    Generic anti-inflammatory action in rodent models. Suppressing inflammation without modifying the immune process is what corticosteroids do, and they are used in RA precisely as a bridge rather than as a treatment.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The direction problem at its clearest. Every approved use of this compound depends on enhancing immune response, and RA is treated by suppressing or redirecting it. Anyone on a biologic or a JAK inhibitor should treat this as an interaction question for their rheumatologist rather than an addition.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    The innate repair receptor is genuinely anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective, which makes this the most coherent rationale here. It has no RA evidence, and its developer appears to have wound down.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin is implicated in RA synovial inflammation and in neutrophil extracellular traps, which are a proposed source of citrullinated autoantigens. That makes it part of the disease process rather than a treatment for it — the same pattern as psoriasis and lupus.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect. Obesity worsens RA disease activity and reduces treatment response, and weight loss improves both. Acts through the metabolic route, not the immune one.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Rheumatoid arthritis has a window of opportunity, and it closes. Erosion is irreversible, early treatment prevents it, and outcomes are measurably better when disease-modifying therapy starts within the first months. Treat-to-target — escalating until remission or low disease activity is reached, and measuring it rather than assuming it — is the standard of care and it works.

Methotrexate remains the anchor drug, with leflunomide and sulfasalazine alongside it. Where that fails: anti-TNF agents, IL-6 receptor blockade, abatacept, rituximab, and the JAK inhibitors — which carry boxed warnings for major cardiovascular events, malignancy, thrombosis and mortality following a post-marketing safety trial, and are positioned accordingly. Corticosteroids are a bridge, not a destination.

The genuinely new frontier is prevention. The APIPPRA trial randomised 213 ACPA-positive people with arthralgia but no arthritis to twelve months of abatacept or placebo, and reported reduced progression to rheumatoid arthritis — with the difference persisting years after treatment stopped in long-term follow-up. ARIAA and TREAT EARLIER tested related approaches in people with subclinical joint inflammation on MRI. Treating an autoimmune disease before it arrives is a real research programme now, and it is a long way from anything on this page.

Alongside drugs: smoking cessation, which affects both risk and disease activity; exercise, which does not damage rheumatoid joints and is frequently avoided out of fear that it does; and cardiovascular risk management, because RA independently raises it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Methotrexate, the anti-TNF, IL-6, CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD20 biologics, and the JAK inhibitors. None is a peptide.

Lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus)

A multi-system autoimmune disease characterised by loss of tolerance to nucleic acids and a type I interferon signature. It can affect skin, joints, kidneys, blood, serosal membranes and the central nervous system, and lupus nephritis is the complication that most determines long-term outcome.

6 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    Part of the disease mechanism, not a candidate treatment. Cathelicidin complexes with self-DNA released from dying cells and from neutrophil extracellular traps, converting it into a potent stimulus for plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7 and TLR9 — which drives the type I interferon signature that defines this disease. Administering more of a molecule that participates in breaking tolerance to self-DNA, in a disease defined by that failure, is the clearest contraindication by mechanism in this library.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune enhancement in a disease of immune over-activity. The direction problem, again, and lupus is where it matters most — anyone on immunosuppression should treat this as an interaction question for their specialist.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory, which is at least the right direction, and entirely generic against a disease with a specific mechanism.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Appears in discussion of cutaneous lupus for skin remodelling. Photosensitivity is central to cutaneous lupus and sun protection is the intervention that matters.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed for joint and gut symptoms. No evidence, and the pro-angiogenic property is not obviously desirable in an inflammatory vasculopathy.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Longevity framing applied to an autoimmune disease. No data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Hydroxychloroquine is foundational and under-appreciated. It reduces flares, reduces organ damage accrual, improves survival, and is recommended for essentially everyone with lupus who can take it. It is also inexpensive. Annual retinal screening is the trade-off.

Beyond it: corticosteroids at the lowest effective dose and for the shortest time, because cumulative steroid exposure causes much of the long-term damage attributed to the disease; mycophenolate, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide; belimumab (B-cell activating factor); anifrolumab (type I interferon receptor blockade, targeting the mechanism described above); and voclosporin for lupus nephritis. Sun protection is genuine treatment in cutaneous disease, not advice.

A peptide was built for this disease, and it is worth knowing what happened. Rigerimod — also called Lupuzor or the P140 peptide — is a phosphopeptide immunomodulator that met its primary efficacy endpoints in a randomised phase 2b trial with a clean safety profile. It then failed its phase 3, showing no statistically significant response over standard care. That is the third time this pattern appears in this library, alongside exenatide in Parkinson’s disease and semaglutide in Alzheimer’s: encouraging phase 2, definitive phase 3, opposite answer. It is the single most useful thing to know about how drug evidence works, and it is why this site tiers by trial phase rather than by enthusiasm.

The transformative development is not a peptide either. CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy in refractory lupus has produced deep remission in the majority of treated patients, with many discontinuing all immunosuppression including glucocorticoids — what is being described as drug-free remission. Neurotoxicity has been reported at around 3%, far below the rate seen when the same approach is used in blood cancers. The series are small and early. It is still the most striking thing happening in autoimmune disease.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Hydroxychloroquine, belimumab, anifrolumab and voclosporin. None is a peptide, and the peptide that was developed for lupus failed phase 3.

HIV

A manageable chronic infection, and one of the great successes of modern medicine. It also contains an approved peptide drug in this library whose indication had no home until now — and a lesson about route that this site keeps rediscovering.

6 compounds documented
  • Enfuvirtide Study

    An approved antiretroviral, and a peptide that shows what the delivery problem costs. Enfuvirtide is a 36-residue peptide that blocks HIV entry by binding gp41 and preventing the virus fusing with the cell membrane — a genuinely novel mechanism when it arrived, and it worked. It requires twice-daily subcutaneous injection, and injection site reactions occur in almost everyone who uses it. That is why it has been largely displaced by oral tablets and long-acting injectables that are just as effective and far more tolerable: not because the science failed, but because a peptide that cannot be swallowed loses to a small molecule that can. It survives as a salvage option in multi-drug-resistant infection.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The immunological framing is obvious and the history is instructive: thymic peptides were investigated in HIV in the era before effective antiretrovirals, and what actually restored immune function was suppressing the virus, not stimulating the immune system. CD4 counts recover when viral replication stops. That is a complete answer to the immune-support argument in this disease.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    Approved specifically in this population — for excess visceral abdominal fat in HIV-associated lipodystrophy, which has its own entry. One of very few GH-axis compounds with a real approval and real trial data.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has antiviral activity in laboratory work, including against HIV in vitro. In vitro antiviral activity is abundant and clinically meaningless without a drug that works in a person.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Increasingly relevant: people with HIV now live long enough to develop ordinary metabolic disease, and weight gain on modern regimens — particularly integrase inhibitors — is a recognised issue. Check interactions with antiretrovirals rather than assuming, and note that delayed gastric emptying can alter absorption of drugs where consistent levels matter enormously.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No evidence. And a caution that applies to this whole page: nothing here substitutes for antiretroviral therapy, and interruptions in treatment cause resistance and harm.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The two facts that matter most are both good news, and both are still under-known.

Undetectable equals untransmittable. A person on effective antiretroviral therapy with a sustained undetectable viral load cannot transmit HIV sexually. This is established beyond reasonable doubt by large studies and is endorsed by public health bodies worldwide. It changes what a diagnosis means — for relationships, for stigma, for conception — and a great many people, including some clinicians, still do not know it.

PrEP works. Pre-exposure prophylaxis — daily oral tablets, or long-acting injectable cabotegravir, or now lenacapavir given twice yearly — is highly effective at preventing infection in people at risk. Post-exposure prophylaxis started within 72 hours of a specific exposure is the other route. Both are under-used relative to need.

Treatment itself is now typically a single daily tablet, or a long-acting injection every one or two months, with life expectancy approaching that of the general population when treatment starts early. Testing is the bottleneck, because late diagnosis remains the main driver of poor outcomes and of onward transmission — and self-testing kits are widely available.

One point specific to this readership: sharing or reusing needles transmits HIV and hepatitis B and C, and that risk is not confined to recreational drug use. Anyone injecting anything should use new sterile equipment every time and never share, including with a training partner. Injection safety covers the rest.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Enfuvirtide is an approved peptide antiretroviral, and tesamorelin is approved for a complication of the disease. The drugs that transformed HIV are small molecules.

Injection harm, infection & anaphylaxis

Not a disease — the set of things that go wrong from the act of injecting itself, independent of what is in the syringe. This library documents compounds that are overwhelmingly injected, and these harms are commoner than anything most of them are hoped to fix.

7 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Named because it is among the most frequently injected compounds in this space, and often locally, into or near a joint or tendon. Intra-articular and peri-tendinous injection carries meaningfully higher stakes than subcutaneous: a septic joint is a surgical emergency that destroys cartilage within days. Sterile technique and a sterile product are different problems, and research-grade material addresses neither.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Same pattern of local use, same considerations.

  • KLOW Theorized

    Blends multiply the variables — more components, more excipients, more chances that one of them is the problem, and no way to tell which.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Frequently injected daily during loading, often by people with no clinical background, and reconstituted vials are commonly kept far longer than they should be.

  • Semaglutide Study

    The contrast worth drawing. Pharmaceutical pens are sterile, single-patient, dose-accurate and manufactured under regulated conditions. Compounded and grey-market versions bypass all four of those, and dosing errors from drawing “units” out of a vial with an insulin syringe have caused documented overdoses severe enough to require hospital treatment.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    The most dangerous thing in this library by a wide margin. Insulin is a peptide, it is available, and it is used non-medically for its anabolic reputation. Hypoglycaemia can cause seizures, brain injury and death, it can develop while asleep, and there is no dose that is reliably safe in someone who does not need it. This is not a cautionary framing; people have died. If someone using insulin becomes confused, sweaty, shaky or drowsy, that is an emergency requiring sugar immediately and an ambulance.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Frequently injected intradermally or used in mesotherapy-style protocols. The skin is not a low-risk compartment — it is where mycobacterial and atypical infections from non-sterile injection typically show up, often weeks later.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Anaphylaxis is the one that kills quickly. Any injected substance can provoke it, and the risk is not proportional to how “natural” or how small the molecule is. Onset is typically within minutes: widespread hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, difficulty breathing or wheeze, vomiting, collapse. Adrenaline into the outer thigh is the treatment and it is time-critical — antihistamines do not treat anaphylaxis. Call an ambulance every time, because reactions can recur hours later. People with asthma, particularly poorly controlled asthma, are at markedly higher risk of a fatal outcome, which is set out on that page. Never inject anything for the first time alone.

Infection is the commonest serious harm, and it is preventable. Abscesses, cellulitis, and — rarely but catastrophically — endocarditis, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. Warning signs are spreading redness, increasing pain after the first day or two, swelling, heat, fever or feeling systemically unwell. Pain that worsens rather than settles after 48 hours is the single most useful signal. Basic practice: new sterile needle and syringe every time, never shared with anyone; clean hands; alcohol swab and let it dry; do not touch the needle or the vial stopper; single-use vials are single-use, and multi-dose vials have a limited life once punctured and must be refrigerated. Bacteriostatic water contains benzyl alcohol and is not interchangeable with sterile water for every purpose, and its preservative is what gives a reconstituted vial its limited shelf life.

Research-grade material is the uncontrolled variable underneath all of this. Purity, identity, sterility, endotoxin content and residual solvents are all unverified in products labelled not for human use, and independent testing has repeatedly found underdosing, overdosing, wrong compounds and contamination. Endotoxin is worth knowing about specifically: it is bacterial debris that survives sterilisation, causes fever, rigors and malaise within hours of injection, and is not removed by a sterile filter.

Other injury worth knowing: nerve injury from injecting in the wrong site — lasting numbness or shooting pain means stop and seek advice; intravascular injection of a substance meant to go subcutaneously; injection into scar tissue from repeated use of the same site, which also alters absorption; and lipohypertrophy from failing to rotate sites, which is common and changes how much drug actually gets absorbed. Sharps go in a sharps bin — not household waste, where they injure other people.

And if something goes wrong, tell the doctor what you took. Every entry on this site that involves a diagnostic confusion — hCG and tumour markers, prolactin, creatinine and muscle mass, haematocrit — turns on the clinician knowing. Embarrassment is a poor trade against a wrong diagnosis, and emergency clinicians are not interested in judging you.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Not applicable. This entry is about the route, not the drug.

Antimicrobial resistance & biofilm

Host-defence peptides as a proposed answer to resistance. A serious research field with a long record of failing at the toxicity and stability stages.

3 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    The human cathelicidin, with broad-spectrum activity and anti-biofilm effects in vitro. Its systemic use is limited by exactly the pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic properties that make it effective locally.

  • KPV Theorized

    Some reported antimicrobial activity alongside its anti-inflammatory profile.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Copper has intrinsic antimicrobial properties.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Culture-directed antibiotic therapy, source control, antimicrobial stewardship, and vaccination. Self-directed use of an antimicrobial peptide contributes to the resistance problem it is being marketed as the solution to.

ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome)

A serious, disabling multi-system condition whose cardinal feature is post-exertional malaise — a worsening of symptoms after activity, characteristically delayed by hours or days, disproportionate to the exertion, and with a recovery measured in days, weeks or longer. That single feature separates it from ordinary fatigue and governs everything about how it is managed.

9 compounds documented
  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is a leading hypothesis for post-exertional malaise, which makes a cardiolipin-stabilising agent the most mechanistically pointed candidate here. Read its own page first: three randomised trials in populations with genuine, measurable mitochondrial pathology missed their primary endpoints. Expecting more in a condition where mitochondrial dysfunction is hypothesised rather than demonstrated is the opposite of what that record predicts.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Same mitochondrial rationale, weaker evidence — rodent and human association only.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Same family, same rationale, same absence of human intervention data.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed aggressively to this population by infusion clinics. No controlled evidence in ME/CFS, an unresolved question about whether infused NAD+ enters cells intact at all, and a price point that lands on people who frequently cannot work.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune dysregulation is a serious research hypothesis in ME/CFS, particularly in post-infectious onset. This compound has real approvals elsewhere and pushes immune tone in a direction nobody has established is the right one here.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Viral persistence is another live hypothesis, which is where the antimicrobial framing comes from. No evidence in this condition, and the autoimmune cautions on that page apply.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used for the cognitive component — the difficulty with concentration and processing that patients describe and that is genuinely disabling. No evidence here.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Widely discussed, entirely on community reporting.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Oxidative stress framing, delivered by infusion clinics alongside NAD+. The antioxidant trial record generally is poor.

What actually has evidence for this condition

There is no proven disease-modifying treatment, and saying so plainly is more useful than implying otherwise. This is a condition with a long history of being dismissed as psychological, and of patients being harmed by treatment built on that assumption. It is a physical illness, the disability is real, and the absence of a treatment is a failure of research investment rather than evidence that nothing is wrong.

The guidance changed, and the change matters. NICE guideline NG206, published in October 2021, removed graded exercise therapy as a recommended treatment — concluding it should not be used — and repositioned cognitive behavioural therapy as supportive rather than curative. Activity advice must be personalised and PEM-aware. Fixed incremental exercise programmes that ignore post-exertional malaise are the specific thing the guideline rejected.

What has support is energy management — pacing. Staying within an individual exertion envelope, planning rest before it is needed rather than after, and treating the identifiable components: orthostatic intolerance and POTS, sleep disturbance, pain, and mast cell activation where present. Reasonable adjustments at work or in education. Specialist referral where available.

The safety point specific to this condition, and it is not obvious. Anything that produces a temporary lift in energy — a stimulant, a nootropic, an infusion, a compound that makes someone feel briefly capable — is dangerous here in a way it is not elsewhere, because it can mask the exertion ceiling. The harm is not usually the compound. It is what the compound allows someone to do before the crash arrives a day or two later. Community reporting of a good week followed by a severe relapse is the most common story in this space, and it is consistent with exactly that mechanism.

This condition also attracts one of the highest concentrations of unproven commercial offerings of anything on this page, aimed at people with limited income, limited energy to evaluate claims, and every reason to hope. That is a reason for more scepticism on their behalf, not less.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Rintatolimod (Ampligen) holds an approval in Argentina and is not FDA-approved. There is no approved treatment in the US, UK or EU.

Long COVID

A heterogeneous, poorly-defined and genuinely disabling set of presentations following SARS-CoV-2 infection. A substantial proportion of cases meet criteria for ME/CFS, and dysautonomia including POTS is common — which means much of what is known about managing it comes from those conditions rather than from long COVID research itself.

9 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Actually being tested. Semaglutide is one of the interventions in the NIH RECOVER-TLC programme, alongside baricitinib, low-dose naltrexone and stellate ganglion block. That makes it the only compound in this library in a funded long COVID trial — and the trial has not reported, so there is nothing to cite yet beyond the fact that someone is doing this properly.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune dysregulation framing, and it was investigated during acute COVID with mixed results. It did not enter standard care anywhere, which is the informative outcome.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is a leading hypothesis for post-exertional malaise. Its own trial record — three randomised failures in populations with demonstrable mitochondrial pathology — is the reason to hold this lightly.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Same mitochondrial rationale, rodent evidence.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed heavily to this population by infusion clinics, with no controlled evidence. See the POTS entry for the saline confound.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Viral persistence is a serious hypothesis and is one of the mechanisms RECOVER is investigating. This compound has no evidence in it, and its autoimmune liabilities are documented on its own page.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Heavily discussed, entirely on community reporting.

  • Semax Anecdotal

    Used for the cognitive component, which is real and disabling. No evidence here.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Oxidative stress framing, delivered alongside NAD+ by the same clinics.

What actually has evidence for this condition

There is still no proven disease-modifying treatment, and the honest version of this page says so. What has changed is that the question is now being asked properly: the NIH RECOVER-CT programme completed eight clinical trials testing thirteen candidate treatments during 2025, with results beginning to publish, and RECOVER-TLC is running a further set including baricitinib, low-dose naltrexone, semaglutide and stellate ganglion block.

The clearest negative result so far is worth knowing. The STOP-PASC trial of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir — Paxlovid — found no significant improvement in fatigue, brain fog or body aches against placebo, and extended-duration arms reported subsequently also failed to improve post-exertional malaise, cognitive dysfunction or orthostatic intolerance. The antiviral hypothesis, tested directly in established long COVID, did not deliver.

The clearest positive result is about prevention rather than treatment, and it is an old cheap drug. In the randomised COVID-OUT trial, metformin started early in acute COVID reduced subsequent long COVID incidence by roughly a third, with larger effects reported in analyses of people treated within three days. Metformin is inexpensive, widely available and has few interactions. Vaccination also reduces the risk of developing long COVID.

For management now: pacing and avoidance of post-exertional symptom exacerbation where PEM is present — and graded exercise is actively harmful in that subset, which is the same position NICE took for ME/CFS. Treat the identifiable components: POTS and orthostatic intolerance, sleep disorder, mast cell activation, breathing pattern disorder, and depression or anxiety where present. Specialist clinic referral where available.

This condition attracts the highest concentration of unproven commercial offerings of anything on this page, aimed at people who are frequently unable to work and have every reason to hope. That is a reason for more scepticism on their behalf, not less.

Group 06

Oncological

Two things at once. It states the standing caution — several of the most popular compounds here promote angiogenesis and growth signalling, the one property you would least want near a tumour. And it covers the cancers where a peptide genuinely is the treatment, because two compounds in this library have oncology as their primary licensed indication, and one class of peptide is used to carry radiation directly into tumour cells.

Growth signalling & angiogenesis — the standing caution

Not a treatment section. The mechanisms that make several compounds here attractive for tissue repair are the same mechanisms tumours use, and the theoretical concern applies to anyone with a current or past malignancy.

8 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The clearest concern in the library. IGF-1 signalling is associated with proliferation in multiple cancer types, and this analogue was designed to evade the binding proteins that normally restrain it.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    An IGF-1 splice variant with the same class of concern.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH secretagogues raise IGF-1 systemically. The concern is about the downstream hormone, not the secretagogue itself.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic in the animal models used to argue for it. Angiogenesis is a hallmark of tumour growth; anti-angiogenic drugs are a cancer treatment class.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Promotes cell migration and angiogenesis — the two processes central to metastasis. Thymosin beta-4 expression correlates with metastatic potential in some tumour studies.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Presented in the literature as having gene-expression-normalising effects, with in vitro work pointing in both directions.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Darkens existing naevi and can obscure the change in appearance that skin cancer surveillance depends on. Melanoma cases have been reported in users.

  • Epitalon Theorized

    Telomerase activation is the specific claim, and telomerase reactivation is a near-universal feature of cancer cells. The Russian literature argues the opposite; neither position is settled.

What actually has evidence for this condition

This is a caution, not a contraindication established by evidence — no human study has shown that any of these compounds causes or accelerates cancer, because no human study has looked. The honest position is that the mechanisms are shared, the exposure is unmonitored, and anyone with a history of malignancy should be discussing this with their oncologist rather than reading a website.

Breast cancer

The commonest cancer in women, and mostly hormone-receptor-positive — which is why a peptide in this library is part of the standard adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women, used to switch the ovaries off rather than to treat the tumour directly.

11 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    Approved and part of standard care, by the same pulsatility paradox described under prostate cancer. Continuous GnRH-agonist exposure desensitises the pituitary and suppresses ovarian oestrogen production. In the randomised SOFT and TEXT trials, adding ovarian suppression to endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive disease improved disease-free survival and, on longer follow-up, overall survival — and ovarian suppression with an aromatase inhibitor outperformed ovarian suppression with tamoxifen. Goserelin is the agent used most often in this setting. This induces menopause; it is not something to approach casually.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is implicated in breast cancer proliferation and in resistance to endocrine therapy, and this analogue was built to evade the binding proteins that restrain IGF-1. The standing caution at its sharpest.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    IGF-1 splice variant, same concern.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically. The concern is the downstream hormone.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Genuinely relevant, and for a reason that is often stated backwards. Obesity raises postmenopausal breast cancer risk because adipose tissue is where oestrogen is produced after the ovaries stop — aromatase in fat converts androgens to oestrogen. Less fat means less oestrogen exposure. Observational data presented in 2026 also reported lower rates of metastatic progression among GLP-1 users, at 10% against 20% — real-world and unrandomised, so treat it as a hypothesis worth testing rather than a result. Weight loss during active treatment is a decision for the oncology team, not a self-directed one.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    Reduces visceral fat, which looks aligned with the paragraph above — but it does so by raising GH and IGF-1, in a cancer where IGF-1 signalling drives proliferation. The wrong route to the right destination.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    Appears because of lactation, and the honest note is epidemiological rather than pharmacological: breastfeeding is associated with reduced breast cancer risk. That is not an argument for administering oxytocin, which has an approved obstetric role covered under postpartum haemorrhage.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Used topically for radiotherapy skin changes. Anything applied to skin inside a radiotherapy field should be cleared with the radiation oncology team, because some topical preparations alter surface dose.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic in the models used to promote it. Also discussed for post-surgical and post-radiotherapy recovery, with no human evidence in either.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Promotes cell migration and angiogenesis — the two processes that define metastasis.

  • Epitalon Theorized

    Telomerase activation is the explicit claim, and telomerase reactivation is a near-universal property of cancer cells.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Treatment is decided by receptor status, and that is the first thing to understand about it. Hormone-receptor-positive disease is treated with endocrine therapy — tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, ovarian suppression as above, and CDK4/6 inhibitors. HER2-positive disease is treated with antibodies against HER2. Triple-negative disease is treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. “Breast cancer” describes several different diseases that happen to share an organ.

And the antibody-drug conjugates use exactly the trick described under neuroendocrine tumours. Trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan are targeting molecules chemically bonded to a cytotoxic payload: the antibody finds the tumour by its surface protein and delivers the drug inside it. In PRRT the payload is a radioactive atom and the address label is a peptide; here the payload is chemotherapy and the label is an antibody. Same architecture, and it has changed outcomes in both diseases. T-DXd also works in tumours with low HER2 expression, which redrew the diagnostic categories.

Alongside: surgery and radiotherapy, screening mammography, and genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and other genes, which changes surgical decisions, eligibility for PARP inhibitors, and what happens to the patient’s relatives. Aromatase inhibitors and ovarian suppression both cause bone loss, so bone protection and loading exercise are part of the treatment rather than an optional extra — and this is where supervised training genuinely helps. Exercise during and after treatment improves fatigue, function and quality of life, with good trial evidence.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Goserelin, leuprolide and triptorelin are approved peptides here, used for ovarian suppression. The targeted agents are antibodies and small molecules.

Colorectal cancer

Cancer of the colon and rectum — highly preventable, highly curable when found early, and rising sharply in people under 50. It carries the most direct warning in this library about a specific harm: not that a compound causes cancer, but that taking one for gut symptoms can delay the diagnosis.

8 compounds documented
  • Teduglutide Study

    An approved peptide whose licence requires cancer surveillance — which is a category of fact this library should have covered sooner. Teduglutide is a GLP-2 analogue, and GLP-2 is intestinotrophic: making intestinal tissue grow is precisely the therapeutic effect in short bowel syndrome. The label states it has the potential to cause hyperplastic changes including neoplasia, and mandates colonoscopy of the entire colon with polyp removal within six months before starting, a follow-up at one year, and then every five years. Colorectal polyps were found in the trials, and treatment must stop if colorectal cancer is diagnosed. A growth signal strong enough to regrow gut is a growth signal strong enough to worry about.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The most important entry on this page, and the harm is not the one people expect. This compound is promoted for “gut healing” and taken for exactly the symptoms that colorectal cancer presents with: altered bowel habit, bleeding, abdominal pain, unexplained anaemia. The risk is not that it causes cancer — it is that symptomatic improvement, real or placebo, buys the delay that turns a curable cancer into an incurable one. Rectal bleeding attributed to “haemorrhoids that got better on BPC” is how young patients present late. It is also pro-angiogenic, which is a separate and lesser concern. Any change in bowel habit lasting weeks, any rectal bleeding, and any unexplained iron deficiency needs investigating before anything is taken for it.

  • Linaclotide Study

    Approved for constipation-predominant IBS, and the same principle applies: constipation of recent onset in an adult over 40, or with bleeding or weight loss, is a red flag requiring investigation before symptomatic treatment. The drug is legitimate; treating an unexamined change in bowel habit is not.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Obesity is an established colorectal cancer risk factor. A large observational study of over 170,000 people with diabetes and obesity reported modestly reduced rates of fourteen obesity-related cancers among GLP-1 users compared with DPP-4 inhibitor users, with colorectal cancer showing the strongest signal. Unrandomised and confounded by the reasons people are prescribed one drug over another — encouraging, not established.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same reasoning, same limitation, less accumulated data.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is associated with colorectal cancer risk in epidemiological work. The standing caution.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in colitis models, and chronic colonic inflammation is itself a cancer risk — see ulcerative colitis. Suppressing inflammatory symptoms without documenting mucosal healing is the same delayed-diagnosis problem in a different form.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Cell migration and angiogenesis.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The single most useful fact here: screening now starts at 45, not 50. The American Cancer Society moved in 2018 and the USPSTF followed in 2021, because incidence in younger adults has been climbing since the mid-1990s — around 2% a year in people aged 20 to 39. Projections suggest colorectal cancer will be the leading cause of cancer death in US adults aged 20 to 49 by 2040. Lowering the age worked: screening in 45-to-49-year-olds rose 62% between 2019 and 2023, and earlier-stage diagnoses rose with it. Uptake is still around a third of those newly eligible. If you are 45 or over and have not been screened, that is the actionable item on this page.

This is the cancer where screening does not just find disease early — it prevents it. Colonoscopy removes adenomatous polyps before they become malignant, which no mammogram or PSA test can do. Faecal immunochemical testing is a valid, non-invasive alternative and a completed FIT beats a declined colonoscopy every time.

Treatment is surgery, with chemotherapy for higher-stage disease, radiotherapy in rectal cancer, and immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient tumours, where responses can be dramatic — and in rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant approaches and non-operative management have spared some patients surgery entirely. Testing for mismatch repair deficiency is standard, partly because it identifies Lynch syndrome, which has consequences for the whole family.

Modifiable risk: obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol, smoking, and processed and red meat. Fibre and physical activity are protective. Aspirin reduces incidence and is used for prevention in Lynch syndrome, though the bleeding trade-off means it is not a general recommendation.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats colorectal cancer. Teduglutide is the peptide that requires screening for it.

Melanoma & skin cancer

The one cancer in this library with published human evidence tying a compound in it to the disease — not a rodent signal, not a theoretical concern about growth signalling, but case reports in dermatology journals of new and changing moles, and melanoma, in people using melanotan.

8 compounds documented
  • Melanotan-2 Study

    Read this before using it, and read it as the strongest warning on this site. Melanotan-II is a melanocortin agonist that tans by stimulating melanocytes — the cells melanoma arises from. The published literature is not theoretical: eruptive new naevi and darkening of existing moles have been documented within 24 hours of a single subcutaneous dose, dermatoscopic changes in existing naevi are reported, and the British Journal of Dermatology carried a case of melanoma in a user — a woman whose moles enlarged and darkened over three months, with histology confirming melanoma. There are two separate harms and both matter. The first is biological: synthetic α-MSH analogues can drive proliferation of melanocytic cells in predisposed people. The second is diagnostic, and it is the one nobody plans for — melanoma is detected by noticing that a mole has changed, and this compound makes every mole change. It destroys the signal the entire surveillance system depends on. Anyone who has used it should have a full-skin dermatology examination with dermatoscopy, and should say what they used.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Directly relevant, and often missed. Bremelanotide is a melanocortin agonist and is in fact the active metabolite of melanotan-II. It is more selective for MC4R and much shorter-acting, which is why it is an approved drug and melanotan is not — but hyperpigmentation and darkening of naevi have been reported with it, and its label acknowledges focal hyperpigmentation. The selectivity reduces the concern; it does not remove it.

  • KPV Theorized

    Also derived from α-MSH — it is the C-terminal tripeptide — and worth distinguishing clearly: it lacks the core melanotropic sequence and is not reported to cause pigmentation or naevus change. Its anti-inflammatory action is the part of α-MSH biology it retains. Same parent molecule, different consequences.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Widely used topically. Skin-remodelling claims are not the issue — the issue is that anything applied to a pigmented lesion to “improve” its appearance may make it look better while it is progressing underneath. Cosmetic treatment of a changing pigmented lesion is never appropriate.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, and melanoma is one of the more angiogenesis-dependent tumours. Also promoted for wound healing over lesions that have not been examined.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Cell migration and angiogenesis. Thymosin beta-4 expression correlates with metastatic potential in some tumour studies, and melanoma is among the malignancies where that work has been done.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing growth-signalling caution.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin is expressed in skin and is implicated in tumour-promoting inflammation in some models. Direction unclear, evidence absent.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Melanoma is a genuinely curable cancer caught early and a lethal one caught late, and the difference is measured in millimetres of depth. That is what makes the surveillance point above so serious: almost the entire benefit of early detection depends on someone noticing that a lesion changed.

What to look for: asymmetry, irregular border, colour variation, diameter over 6 mm, and — the one that matters most — evolution. A lesion that looks different from all the others is worth more attention than one that ticks boxes. Any new, changing, bleeding or non-healing lesion needs a doctor.

Prevention is sun protection, and it is not the same thing as tanning safely. Ultraviolet exposure, intermittent intense exposure and sunburn all raise risk, and sunbeds raise it further, more so with use before the age of 35. The premise behind melanotan — that a tan is protective, so inducing one is a safety measure — fails on its own terms: the pigment induced offers modest photoprotection at best, and the compound producing it acts on the cell type at issue.

Treatment has changed more than in almost any other cancer. Surgical excision with appropriate margins remains the foundation, and sentinel node biopsy stages it. Then immune checkpoint inhibition — anti-PD-1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 — which turned metastatic melanoma from a disease measured in months into one where long-term survival is realistic, and which is now used before and after surgery in higher-risk disease. BRAF and MEK inhibitors for BRAF-mutant tumours. Non-melanoma skin cancers — basal and squamous cell — are far commoner, rarely fatal, and treated surgically.

The people at highest risk are precisely those most likely to want a tan: fair skin that burns easily, red or blonde hair, many moles, a family history, or previous sunburns. Melanotan is marketed hardest to exactly that group.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Afamelanotide (Scenesse) is an approved melanocortin peptide — for erythropoietic protoporphyria, a rare photosensitivity disorder, under specialist supervision with mandatory skin monitoring. It is not approved for cosmetic tanning anywhere, and the monitoring requirement is the point.

Lung cancer

The leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It appears here for a reason that has nothing to do with community use: small cell lung cancer is driven in part by a neuropeptide autocrine loop, which makes it one of the clearest examples of peptide signalling being genuinely central to a cancer.

7 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Two indirect roles. Obesity is a risk factor for several cancers, though the obesity-lung cancer relationship is confounded by smoking. More usefully, the GLP-1 class has randomised evidence for smoking cessation — and smoking cessation is the intervention that matters most in this disease. Observational 2026 data also reported lower metastatic progression in lung cancer among GLP-1 users, 10% against 22%, which is unrandomised and hypothesis-generating only.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is implicated in lung cancer proliferation. The standing caution.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The most defensible immune rationale in this library, and still not enough. It has been studied as an adjunct in lung cancer in some settings, and immune modulation genuinely matters here — checkpoint inhibitors transformed the disease. But “immune stimulation” and “releasing a specific brake on T-cell recognition of tumour” are different things, and only the second one worked.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Expressed in airway epithelium and implicated in tumour-promoting inflammation in some lung models. Direction of effect unresolved.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Carried over from the emphysema gene-signature work under COPD. COPD and lung cancer share smoking as a cause and frequently coexist; the connectivity-map work says nothing about malignancy.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic. Also, and more practically: a persistent cough, haemoptysis or unexplained weight loss needs investigating rather than treating.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial framing. Not studied here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The peptide biology in this disease is real and it is on the tumour’s side. Gastrin-releasing peptide — the mammalian counterpart of the amphibian peptide bombesin — is produced by small cell lung cancer cells and stimulates their own growth through high-affinity receptors they express: a textbook autocrine loop. Neuromedin B does the same in non-small cell disease. GRP-receptor antagonists and anti-bombesin antibodies inhibit growth in laboratory models, which is a real mechanistic story that has never translated into an approved drug. There is a neat closing detail: vasoactive intestinal peptide — the failed asthma bronchodilator — inhibits small cell lung cancer proliferation in vitro. Two lung neuropeptides, opposite effects, neither one a drug.

Everything that matters in practice is prevention and early detection. Smoking causes the large majority of cases, and stopping helps at any age and any stage — including after diagnosis, where it improves treatment outcomes and survival. Low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk current and former smokers, is recommended in the US and increasingly elsewhere, and is badly under-used. Radon is the second leading cause and is testable and fixable in the home.

Treatment is now driven by molecular testing, and this is the disease where targeted therapy changed most: EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS G12C, RET, MET and others each have matched drugs, and comprehensive testing before starting treatment is standard. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with chemotherapy. Surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy for early disease. In small cell lung cancer, where progress was slow for decades, the DLL3-directed bispecific tarlatamab has produced meaningful responses.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved peptide drug. The bombesin/GRP receptor is a validated target that never yielded one.

Pancreatic cancer

One of the most lethal common cancers, usually presenting late. It belongs in this library because the pancreas is the organ named in the most persistent safety question about the GLP-1 class, and that question deserves a clear answer rather than either reassurance or alarm.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    The honest state of the evidence, in order. On pancreatic cancer: a 2025 meta-analysis of 62 randomised trials covering more than 66,000 patients found no significant association with GLP-1 use, and large recent cohorts point if anything the other way. On pancreatitis, which is a different question: the picture is genuinely mixed — some cohorts report increased odds of acute pancreatitis with current use, while others report reduced recurrent pancreatitis in people with a prior episode. Acute pancreatitis remains a labelled warning and the practical rule is unchanged: severe persistent abdominal pain radiating to the back means stop and seek assessment. Also unchanged: a history of pancreatitis is a reason for a prescriber to be involved, not a footnote.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same class question, same labelled pancreatitis warning, shorter record.

  • Exenatide Study

    The agent that generated the original pancreatitis signal in post-marketing reports, which is where two decades of this debate started.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Longest exposure history in the class and no pancreatic cancer signal has emerged from it.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Investigational, same class caution inherited.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is heavily KRAS-driven, and growth factor signalling contributes to its biology.

  • Octreotide Study

    Distinguish carefully: somatostatin analogues treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, which are a different disease with a far better prognosis — see neuroendocrine tumours. They are not a treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and the two are frequently conflated in discussion.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, and promoted for the vague upper-abdominal and digestive symptoms with which this cancer often presents. The delayed-diagnosis argument applies with more force here, because the window in which this disease is operable is narrow.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The reason this cancer is so lethal is timing, not biology alone. It presents late because early disease is silent, and only a minority of patients have resectable disease at diagnosis. The symptoms worth taking seriously are painless jaundice, unexplained weight loss, new-onset diabetes in an older adult without other explanation, and persistent upper abdominal or back pain. New diabetes after 50 with weight loss rather than weight gain is a recognised presentation and is one of the few early clues available.

Treatment is surgery where possible — a major operation best done in high-volume centres — with combination chemotherapy before or after, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based regimens. Germline and tumour genomic testing matters: BRCA-altered tumours respond to platinum agents and PARP inhibitors, and mismatch-repair-deficient tumours to immunotherapy, though that group is small. Palliative care introduced early improves both quality of life and, in some trials, survival, and pancreatic enzyme replacement for malabsorption is routinely overlooked despite making a real difference to how patients feel.

Risk factors: smoking, obesity, chronic pancreatitis, heavy alcohol use, diabetes, and inherited syndromes including BRCA2, Lynch and familial pancreatic cancer. There is no population screening; surveillance is offered to defined high-risk inherited groups.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved peptide drug for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Somatostatin analogues treat the unrelated neuroendocrine tumours of the same organ.

Liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma)

Almost always arising in a liver already damaged by cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis, which makes it one of the most preventable cancers there is — and directly downstream of two conditions already covered on this page.

9 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Relevant through the disease upstream of it. MASH is now a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma, and treating the metabolic liver disease is how you prevent the cancer. Observational 2026 data reported less metastatic progression in liver cancer among GLP-1 users, 19% against 28% — unrandomised. The meaningful claim is upstream: less steatohepatitis, less cirrhosis, less cancer. That chain is plausible and not yet demonstrated end to end.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same reasoning via the same route.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Study

    The most legitimate entry here. It has approvals in some countries as an adjunct in chronic hepatitis B, and chronic hepatitis B is a major cause of this cancer — see chronic viral infection. Note what actually changed the picture though: nucleos(t)ide analogues for hepatitis B and direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C, neither of which is a peptide.

  • Terlipressin Study

    A cirrhosis drug rather than a cancer drug — approved for hepatorenal syndrome, and used for variceal bleeding, both complications of the cirrhosis in which this cancer arises.

  • Octreotide Study

    Used for acute variceal bleeding in portal hypertension by reducing splanchnic blood flow. Again a complication of the underlying liver disease, not a treatment for the tumour.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The liver is the main site of IGF-1 production and IGF signalling is implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma. The standing caution, in the organ most directly involved.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Promoted for liver support with no human data. Pro-angiogenic, and hepatocellular carcinoma is a strikingly vascular tumour — which is why several of its treatments are anti-angiogenic.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Heavily marketed for liver detoxification by infusion clinics. Hepatic glutathione biology is real; intravenous glutathione as a treatment for liver disease or its prevention is not established.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Same marketing channel, same absence of evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The prevention story here is one of the genuine triumphs of modern medicine, and it is worth stating plainly. Hepatitis B vaccination prevents the infection that causes much of the world’s liver cancer — it is a vaccine that prevents a cancer. Direct-acting antivirals cure hepatitis C in the great majority of patients in a matter of weeks and substantially reduce subsequent cancer risk. Antiviral suppression of hepatitis B does the same. Alcohol and metabolic liver disease are now the growing causes, and both are addressable.

Surveillance is what determines survival. Six-monthly ultrasound, usually with alpha-fetoprotein, in people with cirrhosis or otherwise at high risk. Found early, hepatocellular carcinoma is treatable by resection, ablation or transplantation with good outcomes. Found late, it is not. Surveillance uptake in eligible patients is poor almost everywhere.

For advanced disease, treatment has improved considerably: immunotherapy combinations — atezolizumab with bevacizumab, or durvalumab with tremelimumab — have displaced single-agent sorafenib as first-line therapy, with lenvatinib and several second-line options available. Transarterial chemoembolisation for intermediate disease. Preserving liver function is part of treating the cancer, which is why alcohol cessation and management of cirrhosis run alongside oncological treatment rather than after it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Thymosin alpha-1 has hepatitis B adjunct approvals in some countries. Terlipressin and octreotide are approved peptides for complications of cirrhosis. None treats the tumour.

Endometrial & ovarian cancer

Endometrial cancer is the malignancy most strongly tied to obesity of any cancer, and its incidence is rising accordingly. Ovarian cancer is rarer, presents late, and is where inherited risk matters most. Both connect directly to conditions covered elsewhere on this page.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    The obesity-cancer link is stronger here than anywhere else, and the mechanism is specific rather than vague. Adipose tissue converts androgens to oestrogen through aromatase, so obesity produces continuous unopposed oestrogen exposure of the endometrium — and unopposed oestrogen is what drives endometrial hyperplasia and then cancer. This is the same aromatase biology described under breast cancer. Weight loss reduces that exposure. It is a risk-reduction argument, not a treatment.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same mechanism, larger weight effect, no cancer outcome data.

  • Leuprolide Study

    Approved for endometriosis and fibroids rather than for these cancers, and included because GnRH-agonist suppression is sometimes used in fertility-sparing management of low-grade endometrial disease and in some hormone-sensitive gynaecological tumours — always as a specialist decision. Progestin therapy, including the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, is the better-established fertility-sparing option in atypical hyperplasia and early low-grade endometrial cancer.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Drives the reproductive axis upstream of GnRH. In a hormone-sensitive gynaecological cancer that is the wrong direction, exactly as it is in prostate cancer.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    No cancer role. Included for the epidemiology that keeps appearing in discussion: parity, breastfeeding and combined oral contraceptive use are all associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk, and the contraceptive effect is substantial and long-lasting.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution. IGF signalling is implicated in endometrial cancer, and the population at risk overlaps heavily with metabolic syndrome.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic. Also promoted for pelvic pain and menstrual symptoms — and postmenopausal bleeding is the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer and needs investigating, not treating.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Pineal and longevity framing extended to reproductive ageing. Telomerase activation claims in a cancer context are the concern.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Postmenopausal bleeding is the point of this entry. Any bleeding after the menopause needs prompt investigation — usually ultrasound and endometrial sampling. Endometrial cancer is frequently curable when caught at that stage, and most cases do present with bleeding, which makes it one of the more detectable cancers if the symptom is acted on. Heavy or irregular bleeding before the menopause matters too, particularly with obesity, PCOS or an absence of ovulation — all of which produce the same unopposed oestrogen exposure. PCOS carries a genuinely increased endometrial cancer risk, and this is under-communicated to the women who have it.

Endometrial cancer treatment is hysterectomy with staging, radiotherapy or chemotherapy by risk group, and immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient disease, where it has performed strikingly well. Molecular classification now guides treatment. Fertility-sparing management is possible in selected low-grade cases.

Ovarian cancer is the harder problem. Symptoms — bloating, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, urinary frequency — are non-specific and often attributed to IBS, which is exactly why it presents late; new persistent symptoms of that kind in a woman over 50 deserve investigation rather than a diet change. Population screening does not work and has not reduced mortality. What does help: surgery by a specialist gynaecological oncologist, platinum-based chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors, which changed maintenance treatment substantially, and germline BRCA1/2 testing for everyone diagnosed — it guides treatment and identifies relatives who can act on the information. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA carriers is highly effective, and combined oral contraceptives reduce risk in the general population.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: GnRH agonists are approved peptides for benign gynaecological conditions and used selectively here. The treatments that work are surgery, platinum chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy.

Thyroid cancer

Mostly papillary and mostly curable, with medullary thyroid carcinoma as the rarer and more serious exception. It appears in this library for one reason above all: it is the disease named in the boxed warning on every GLP-1 agonist, and that warning is widely misread in both directions.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    The boxed warning, explained properly. Every GLP-1 agonist carries a warning about thyroid C-cell tumours and is contraindicated in anyone with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or MEN2. It came from rodent toxicology: rats and mice developed C-cell hyperplasia and tumours on chronic exposure. The reason it may not translate is specific and mechanistic — human C-cells express substantially fewer GLP-1 receptors than rodent C-cells, and human studies have not shown a meaningful rise in calcitonin, the marker of C-cell activity. Human cohorts and meta-analyses have not found increased rates of the common differentiated thyroid cancers. The contraindication still stands, and the reason to respect it is that MTC is exactly the tumour the rodent data pointed at.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same class warning, same rodent origin, same contraindication for MTC and MEN2. The reassuring human data on common thyroid cancers is shorter for the newer agents simply because they have been in use for less time.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Carries the identical warning; the longest human exposure record in the class, and it has not produced a thyroid cancer signal.

  • Dulaglutide Study

    Same class warning.

  • Exenatide Study

    Same class warning. Worth noting that the warning is a class property inherited from rodent studies rather than a finding for each individual agent.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Investigational and carries the same class caution by inheritance. The trial programmes exclude people with a history of MTC or MEN2, which is why no trial will ever answer the question directly.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    General growth-signalling caution rather than anything thyroid-specific.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing. Note that immune checkpoint inhibitors cause thyroid dysfunction frequently, which is a reminder that the thyroid is unusually exposed to immune modulation.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The most important fact about thyroid cancer is that it is over-diagnosed. Widespread neck imaging finds small papillary cancers that would never have caused symptoms, and in places where screening became routine the diagnosed incidence rose dramatically while deaths did not move at all. The response has been active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma — watching rather than operating — alongside less aggressive surgery and much more selective use of radioactive iodine. Finding a cancer is not the same as needing it removed, and this is one of the clearest examples in medicine.

There is an approved protein drug here that most people have never heard of. Thyrotropin alfa is recombinant human TSH, given to stimulate thyroglobulin release and radioiodine uptake during follow-up — which means patients no longer have to be made deliberately hypothyroid by withdrawing their levothyroxine to get a usable test. It removed weeks of avoidable misery from surveillance. Thyroglobulin then serves as the tumour marker for differentiated disease, and calcitonin — a peptide hormone, and the same molecule that lost its osteoporosis indication — is the marker for medullary carcinoma.

Treatment is surgery, selective radioactive iodine, and TSH suppression with levothyroxine, which is where this connects to hypothyroidism — the dose is deliberately higher than replacement, and anything that alters levothyroxine absorption matters more here than usual. For iodine-refractory disease: lenvatinib and sorafenib. For RET-altered medullary carcinoma, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, which are targeted small molecules and represent a genuine advance. Genetic testing for RET matters in MTC because it is often inherited, and identifying it changes what happens to the patient’s family.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Thyrotropin alfa is a recombinant protein used diagnostically. Calcitonin is the peptide tumour marker. The treatments are surgery, radioiodine and kinase inhibitors.

Prostate cancer

The commonest cancer in men in most Western countries, and the disease where a peptide in this library is not a candidate but the standard of care. It is also the second clean demonstration of pulsatility on this site — the same receptor is driven by pulses and switched off by a continuous signal.

10 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    An approved cornerstone treatment, and a paradox worth understanding. Leuprolide is a GnRH agonist, and it suppresses testosterone. That sounds backwards until you know that GnRH is normally released in pulses — continuous receptor stimulation desensitises and downregulates the pituitary, shutting the axis down. The same principle as teriparatide, running in the opposite direction: pulses stimulate, continuous exposure suppresses. The clinical consequence is the testosterone flare — an initial surge before suppression sets in, which can cause real deterioration in someone with spinal metastases or urinary obstruction, and is covered with an anti-androgen for the first weeks. This is not a compound to explore recreationally; it induces medical castration.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    The direction problem, and here it is genuinely serious. Kisspeptin sits upstream of GnRH and drives the axis — it is used experimentally to stimulate the reproductive axis and raise testosterone. In a hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, that is the exact opposite of the therapeutic goal. Anyone on androgen deprivation should treat this as contraindicated by mechanism rather than untested.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is associated with prostate cancer risk and progression in epidemiological work, and this analogue was engineered to evade the binding proteins that normally restrain IGF-1. The clearest single concern in this library, applied to one of the diseases where the association is best documented.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    An IGF-1 splice variant, same class of concern.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH secretagogues raise IGF-1 systemically. The concern is the downstream hormone, not the secretagogue.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    Tempting for the wrong reason. Androgen deprivation causes visceral fat gain, muscle loss and insulin resistance, so a compound that reduces visceral fat looks well matched — but it works by raising GH and therefore IGF-1, in a cancer where IGF-1 signalling is implicated. Resistance training and the metabolic drugs below achieve the same goal without that trade-off.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Erectile dysfunction after prostatectomy, radiotherapy or androgen deprivation is common, under-discussed and genuinely distressing. Bremelanotide acts centrally rather than on the vasculature, which is a different mechanism from the PDE5 inhibitors — but low libido on androgen deprivation is caused by the absence of testosterone, and no central agent replaces it. Bremelanotide is approved for women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder, not for men, and not in this setting.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Genuinely relevant to the collateral damage. Androgen deprivation reliably causes weight gain, insulin resistance and increased cardiovascular risk, and metabolic management is part of good survivorship care. Not a cancer treatment.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic in the models used to argue for it, in the presence of a tumour. Also discussed for radiation proctitis and post-surgical recovery, with no human evidence.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Promotes cell migration and angiogenesis — the two processes central to metastasis.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Androgen deprivation is the backbone, and the choice between agonist and antagonist now has data behind it. GnRH agonists — leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin — cause the flare described above. GnRH antagonists block the receptor directly, so testosterone falls immediately with no surge: degarelix by injection, and relugolix, which is oral. In the phase 3 HERO trial relugolix achieved sustained castration in 96.7% against 88.8% for leuprolide, with faster recovery afterwards, and reported major adverse cardiovascular events in 2.9% against 6.2% — roughly half. Imaging work has since found slower coronary plaque progression on relugolix than leuprolide. Be careful how much weight that carries: the PRONOUNCE trial comparing degarelix with leuprolide closed early and could not confirm a cardiovascular difference. The signal is real enough to influence the choice in a man with existing heart disease, and not settled enough to call decided.

Around that: surgery and radiotherapy with curative intent; active surveillance for low-risk disease, which spares many men treatment they never needed and is the same over-diagnosis lesson as thyroid cancer; androgen receptor pathway inhibitors — abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide — intensified earlier than they used to be; taxane chemotherapy; PARP inhibitors in BRCA-altered disease; and lutetium-177 PSMA, which is the same peptide-targeted radioligand idea described under neuroendocrine tumours, aimed at a different receptor.

The survivorship burden is where this readership can actually help. Androgen deprivation causes muscle loss, fat gain, bone loss and fracture risk, fatigue, hot flushes, sexual dysfunction and mood change. Supervised resistance and impact training counteracts most of it and has good trial evidence in this exact population — it is the single most useful non-drug intervention, and it is under-prescribed. Bone protection is indicated because androgen deprivation causes osteoporosis, and cardiovascular risk needs active management.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin and degarelix are all approved peptides for this disease. Relugolix is a small molecule; lutetium-177 PSMA is a peptide-targeted radioligand.

Neuroendocrine tumours & carcinoid syndrome

Tumours arising from hormone-producing cells, often slow-growing, and frequently secreting enough hormone to cause a syndrome of their own. This is the most remarkable thing peptides do in medicine, and it is nothing like what the rest of this library discusses: here a peptide is used as a targeting device to deliver radiation into tumour cells.

6 compounds documented
  • Octreotide Study

    An approved first-line treatment, and one of the two compounds in this library whose primary indication is oncology. A somatostatin analogue that binds somatostatin receptors, which most well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours express heavily. It does two separate jobs: it controls the hormonal syndrome — the flushing and diarrhoea of carcinoid — and it slows tumour growth, which was shown in a randomised trial rather than assumed. It also stops a carcinoid crisis, which can be precipitated by anaesthesia or by handling the tumour during surgery. Long-acting depot formulations are the practical form.

  • Leuprolide Study

    Listed for the structural parallel rather than the indication. Both it and octreotide are modified hypothalamic-pituitary peptides made durable enough to be drugs, and both earn their place in oncology by acting on a receptor the tumour depends on — see prostate cancer.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    No role. Included because the naming similarity to somatostatin analogues causes genuine confusion in community discussion — SS-31 is a mitochondrial-targeted peptide with no relationship to somatostatin whatsoever.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The growth-signalling caution, in the presence of a tumour that is often indolent and lived with for years.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, and neuroendocrine tumours are notably vascular. Everolimus and sunitinib — both used here — work partly by restricting exactly the signalling and vascular support that a pro-angiogenic compound would promote.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Cell migration and angiogenesis, same objection.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is worth understanding even if it never touches you, because it inverts the usual logic of this whole library. Everywhere else on this site the peptide is the drug and the question is whether it does anything. In PRRT the peptide does nothing therapeutic at all — it is the delivery vehicle. An octreotide-like peptide is chemically bonded to a radioactive lutetium-177 atom; the peptide finds tumour cells by binding their somatostatin receptors, is taken inside, and the radiation is released from within the cell. The tumour’s own receptor is what draws the radiation in.

And it works. The randomised phase 3 NETTER-1 trial compared lutetium-177 dotatate against high-dose octreotide in advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumours: progression-free survival was not even reached in the treatment arm against 8.4 months, a hazard ratio of 0.21. It was approved in the EU in 2017 and the US in 2018. NETTER-2 then took it into first-line treatment of higher-grade disease in 226 patients and was also positive. The same idea has since been aimed at PSMA in prostate cancer. A peptide as an address label for radiation is a genuinely different answer to the delivery problem that defeats peptides everywhere else on this site — it does not need to survive long or reach the cytoplasm intact. It only needs to arrive.

The rest of care: surgery where the disease is resectable, which can be curative; somatostatin analogues — octreotide and lanreotide — as first-line systemic therapy; everolimus and sunitinib; chemotherapy for higher-grade disease; and liver-directed treatment, because the liver is where these tumours usually spread. Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET imaging uses the same receptor-binding trick to find the disease in the first place, which is how eligibility for PRRT is established.

Two practical points. Carcinoid heart disease — fibrotic damage to the right-sided heart valves from chronic serotonin exposure — is a major cause of death and needs echocardiographic surveillance. And a carcinoid crisis is a genuine emergency: anyone with a known neuroendocrine tumour undergoing surgery or a procedure needs the anaesthetist to know, because octreotide cover is what prevents it.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Octreotide and lanreotide are approved peptide drugs here, and lutetium-177 dotatate is an approved peptide-targeted radioligand therapy. This is the strongest peptide oncology story in medicine.

Leukaemia & myelodysplastic syndromes

Malignancies of the blood-forming cells, ranging from an aggressive emergency to a condition monitored for years without treatment. It is also where this library’s longevity claims get tested against reality, because the only telomerase drug ever approved works by switching the enzyme off.

8 compounds documented
  • Epitalon Theorized

    The clearest inversion of a marketing claim on this site. Epitalon is sold on a telomerase activation premise: lengthen telomeres, extend lifespan. Meanwhile the first and only telomerase drug to reach approval — imetelstat, approved in June 2024 for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with transfusion-dependent anaemia — is a telomerase inhibitor, and it works by selectively killing malignant clones, cells that depend on telomerase precisely because they divide without limit. The pharmaceutical read on telomerase in blood cells was that too much of it is the problem. That does not prove epitalon is dangerous. It does show which direction the serious money went.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Read the erythropoietin history below before considering this in any cancer. ARA-290 is derived from the tissue-protective region of erythropoietin specifically to avoid the erythropoietic effects — which is the right instinct, given what happened when cancer patients were given the full molecule. It has no evidence here.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The direction problem in its most acute form. Leukaemia is a cancer of the immune system, and patients are frequently both immunosuppressed and immunologically abnormal at the same time. “Boosting immunity” is not a coherent instruction in a disease where the immune cells themselves are the malignant clone. Anyone in treatment should treat every compound here as a question for their haematologist.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling contributes to proliferation and to chemotherapy resistance in acute leukaemias. The standing caution.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed to cancer patients for fatigue by infusion clinics. NAD+ metabolism is genuinely active in leukaemic cells, which cuts against the marketing rather than for it, and cancer-related fatigue has better-evidenced management.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    A specific caution worth stating. High-dose antioxidants during chemotherapy or radiotherapy are theoretically able to interfere with treatments that work partly through oxidative damage. The clinical evidence is inconclusive in both directions — which is exactly why this belongs to the oncology team and not to an infusion clinic.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, and bone marrow angiogenesis is increased in acute leukaemia and MDS. Also frequently taken for the bruising, fatigue and infections that are how these diseases present.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The erythropoietin story is the most important thing on this page for a peptide audience, and it is a story about a biomarker. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents — epoetin and darbepoetin — correct anaemia in cancer patients. They do exactly what they are designed to do to the haemoglobin. Then the trials read out: increased tumour progression and decreased survival. A boxed warning was added in March 2007, and they are not indicated at all in anaemic cancer patients who are not receiving chemotherapy. A protein therapeutic that fixed the number it targeted and made patients die sooner. Anyone inclined to reason from “this corrects a deficiency, therefore it helps” should sit with that for a moment.

These diseases are wildly different from each other and the treatment reflects it. Acute promyelocytic leukaemia went from the most lethal leukaemia to one cured in the large majority of patients — with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide, largely without conventional chemotherapy. Chronic myeloid leukaemia was transformed by imatinib and its successors into a condition compatible with near-normal life expectancy, and it remains the model case for targeted therapy. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is now treated with BTK inhibitors and venetoclax rather than chemotherapy, and early-stage disease is often watched rather than treated, because treating it sooner does not help. Acute leukaemias need urgent specialist care.

And CAR-T cell therapy started here — CD19-directed cells in refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia — before being turned on lupus and other autoimmune disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains curative for selected patients.

Symptoms worth knowing because they are non-specific and often dismissed: unusual bruising or bleeding, drenching night sweats, unexplained weight loss, recurrent or severe infection, bone pain, and persistent unexplained fatigue with pallor. A full blood count is cheap and answers the question.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Imetelstat is an approved telomerase inhibitor — an oligonucleotide, not a peptide. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are approved glycoproteins carrying a boxed warning in cancer.

Lymphoma

Malignancies of lymphocytes, spanning Hodgkin lymphoma — among the most curable cancers in existence — to indolent lymphomas that are managed for decades and aggressive ones needing immediate treatment. Curability here is high enough that the main risk from anything on this page is delay.

8 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Lymphoma is a malignancy of the exact cells this compound is supposed to modulate, and its whole rationale is thymic T-cell maturation. Stimulating the lineage that has become malignant is not an obviously good idea, and nobody has studied whether it is. Patients are also often immunosuppressed by treatment, making this a haematologist question rather than a supplement decision.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in lymphoproliferative and autoimmune processes. As in lupus, that puts it on the wrong side of the mechanism.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling contributes to lymphoma proliferation in laboratory work. The standing caution.

  • Epitalon Theorized

    Telomerase activation claims — see the leukaemia entry for what the only approved telomerase drug actually does.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The delay risk, and it is real here. Painless swollen lymph nodes, night sweats, itch and unexplained weight loss are the presentation of lymphoma. They are also the sort of vague, systemic complaint that gets self-treated. A lymph node that has been enlarged for more than a few weeks, especially if painless, hard, or over a centimetre, needs examining — and Hodgkin lymphoma is curable in the large majority of patients when treated, which is exactly what makes delay costly.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed for fatigue, which is a prominent lymphoma symptom. No evidence, and the fatigue is worth diagnosing.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Antioxidant infusions during treatment — see the caution under leukaemia.

  • Leuprolide Theorized

    One genuinely relevant use, and it is about fertility rather than cancer. GnRH-agonist ovarian suppression during chemotherapy has been studied for preserving ovarian function, with randomised data in breast cancer and mixed results elsewhere. It does not replace established fertility preservation — egg, embryo or sperm banking before treatment starts — which is the conversation that too often does not happen in time, particularly in young patients with aggressive disease who are treated urgently.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Hodgkin lymphoma is one of medicine’s genuine successes — cure rates are high even in advanced disease, and the modern research question has shifted from curing more patients to curing them with less: less radiotherapy, fewer late cardiac and pulmonary effects, fewer second cancers. Brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors are part of that, and brentuximab is another antibody-drug conjugate — the same address-label architecture as the radioligands and the breast cancer conjugates.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is many diseases. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is aggressive and curable with immunochemotherapy in a majority of patients. Follicular lymphoma is indolent, frequently watched rather than treated when asymptomatic, and treated in a way that reflects being managed over decades. Rituximab — an anti-CD20 antibody — changed outcomes across B-cell lymphomas, and CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers now cure some patients who relapse after everything else.

Practical points: an accurate diagnosis needs adequate tissue, so a core or excision biopsy interpreted by a haematopathologist rather than a fine-needle aspirate. PET-CT for staging and response. Hepatitis B screening before rituximab, because reactivation can be severe. And late effects — cardiac, thyroid, fertility, second malignancy — mean survivorship follow-up is part of the treatment, sometimes for decades. Exercise during and after treatment improves fatigue and function.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats lymphoma. The transformative agents are antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific engagers and cell therapies.

Multiple myeloma

A malignancy of plasma cells in the bone marrow, causing bone destruction, anaemia, kidney impairment and hypercalcaemia. It contains one approved peptide drug used in a way nothing else on this site is — and one specific contraindication for a compound this library already documents.

9 compounds documented
  • Teriparatide Study

    Contraindicated, and this is worth stating plainly because the reasoning looks superficially attractive. Myeloma destroys bone, teriparatide builds bone — so the pairing suggests itself. But teriparatide is contraindicated in skeletal malignancy and bone metastases, and myeloma is a malignancy of the bone marrow with lytic lesions. An anabolic bone agent is exactly what you do not add to a malignant process inside bone. Bone disease in myeloma is treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab — antiresorptives — which is the opposite approach to osteoporosis and for good reason.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    Genuinely relevant, and often unmanaged. Myeloma regimens are built around high-dose dexamethasone, which reliably causes hyperglycaemia — sometimes severe, sometimes newly diagnosed diabetes. Insulin requirements swing with the steroid schedule rather than staying flat, which is a pattern that catches people out.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Among the strongest mechanistic concerns in this library. IGF-1 signalling is a well-documented survival and proliferation pathway in myeloma cells specifically, and has been an explicit drug target in the disease. This analogue was engineered to escape the binding proteins that normally restrain IGF-1.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    IGF-1 splice variant, same pathway.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Anaemia is near-universal in myeloma — and see the erythropoietin boxed warning under leukaemia before reasoning from that.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, and bone marrow angiogenesis increases with myeloma progression — thalidomide and its successors, which are backbone myeloma drugs, are anti-angiogenic. Also promoted for the bone pain that is the commonest presenting symptom.

  • Desmopressin Theorized

    No role, and a caution: myeloma can cause both kidney impairment and acquired bleeding tendencies, which makes fluid and haemostatic management a specialist matter.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Untested here.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The peptide here does something no other compound on this site does: it releases cells rather than treating anything. Motixafortide is a cyclic peptide CXCR4 antagonist, approved in September 2023 alongside G-CSF to mobilise haematopoietic stem cells into the blood so they can be collected for autologous transplantation. CXCR4 is the receptor that holds stem cells in the marrow; blocking it lets them spill out. The effect size is striking — in its randomised trial, 67.5% of patients reached the collection target within two apheresis sessions against 9.5% on the comparator regimen. A peptide as a switch for cell trafficking, and the first advance in mobilisation in a decade.

Otherwise: myeloma treatment has improved enormously and it is now often a disease lived with for many years. Proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies such as daratumumab, autologous stem cell transplant in eligible patients, and — for relapsed disease — CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers, which have produced deep responses after multiple prior lines. Bone protection with a bisphosphonate or denosumab is standard, as is attention to kidney function, infection risk and thrombosis prophylaxis.

Two things worth knowing. Myeloma is preceded by MGUS — monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance — which is common, usually never progresses, and is monitored rather than treated; being told you have it is not being told you have cancer. And myeloma is a recognised cause of unexplained bone loss, which is why the osteoporosis workup includes excluding it. Persistent unexplained back or rib pain, anaemia, kidney impairment or recurrent infection in an older adult is the pattern that should prompt testing.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Motixafortide is an approved cyclic peptide, used for stem cell mobilisation rather than to treat the cancer. Everything treating the disease itself is a small molecule, antibody or cell therapy.

Testicular cancer

The commonest cancer in men aged roughly 15 to 40 — which is this readership’s core demographic — and one of the most curable cancers in medicine, including when it has already spread. It also carries a documented diagnostic problem specific to people who inject things, and that is why this entry is unusually practical.

6 compounds documented
  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    The tumour marker problem, and it has a published case behind it. Beta-hCG is one of the tumour markers for testicular cancer and is not normally detectable in men — which is exactly what makes it useful. Exogenous hCG, widely used post-cycle to restart the testicular axis, produces the same signal. The literature contains a bodybuilder with previously treated seminoma whose routine follow-up hCG came back elevated after he injected hCG; it triggered restaging and could have led to chemotherapy he did not need. Kisspeptin acts higher up the same axis and is used for the same purpose. If you have used hCG or anything acting on this axis, say so before any marker is interpreted. It is the difference between a false alarm and an unnecessary course of chemotherapy — or, worse, a real recurrence dismissed as “probably the hCG”.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Sexual dysfunction after orchidectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or chemotherapy is common and under-discussed. Bremelanotide acts centrally and is approved for women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder, not for men in this setting. Ejaculatory dysfunction after RPLND is a nerve problem and no drug fixes it, which is why nerve-sparing technique and sperm banking matter beforehand.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing growth-signalling caution in a young population that is disproportionately exposed to these compounds.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No relevance to the disease, and a delay risk: a painless testicular lump is the classic presentation and it does not hurt, which is precisely why it gets ignored.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    No role in the disease. Included only to note that testicular tumours can secrete hormones — see the gynaecomastia point below — which is a different and more useful hormonal connection than anything in this list.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Start with the thing that saves lives: a painless lump or swelling in a testicle needs examining now, not after a training block. Testicular cancer is curable in the great majority of patients — cisplatin-based chemotherapy turned metastatic testicular cancer from usually fatal into usually curable, and it remains one of the landmark achievements in oncology. But treatment intensity, and long-term toxicity, both scale with stage. Early is not just better survival; it is less chemotherapy, less late cardiovascular and hearing damage, less second malignancy risk.

Presentations other than a lump, because they are the ones that get missed: a dull ache or heaviness in the scrotum, an enlarged or unusually firm testicle, back pain from retroperitoneal nodes, and gynaecomastia — which can be caused by a hormone-secreting testicular tumour. That last one deserves emphasis for this audience: gynaecomastia in someone using anabolic steroids has an obvious explanation, and obvious explanations are how unusual causes get overlooked. So does testicular atrophy — expected on suppressive compounds, which means changes in testicular size or texture may be dismissed as normal. If you use compounds that shrink your testicles, you have lost a baseline that other men still have. That is an argument for examining yourself more carefully, not less.

Before treatment: bank sperm. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery can all affect fertility, and this is a window that closes. Discuss it before the first cycle, not after.

Treatment is orchidectomy through the groin — not through the scrotum — followed by surveillance, chemotherapy or radiotherapy depending on stage and histology, with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in selected cases. Markers AFP, beta-hCG and LDH are used for diagnosis, staging and monitoring. Long-term follow-up matters: hypogonadism after treatment is common and treatable, and connects to hypogonadism; cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome are increased after platinum chemotherapy; and a contralateral tumour remains a lifelong small risk. Undescended testis, family history and previous testicular cancer are the main risk factors.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats it. hCG — a peptide hormone widely used non-medically — is one of its tumour markers, which is the practical point of this entry.

Sarcoma (bone & soft tissue)

Rare cancers of connective tissue — muscle, fat, bone, cartilage, nerve sheath. This is the sharpest entry in the library on growth signalling, because the pharmaceutical industry spent a decade developing antibodies to block the IGF-1 receptor in tumours of muscle and bone. It also carries a practical warning about lumps that this site is uniquely obliged to state.

7 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Read this even if you skip everything else on the page. IGF-1 receptor signalling is a validated therapeutic target in sarcoma — not a theory. Multiple pharmaceutical companies developed monoclonal antibodies to block IGF-1R specifically for Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma: figitumumab, ganitumab, cixutumumab, dalotuzumab. They produced objective responses in around 10–14% of patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma, including occasional durable complete remissions, before resistance developed quickly and the programmes largely wound down. The industry’s considered read on IGF-1R signalling in muscle- and bone-origin tumours was to try to shut it off. This library contains an IGF-1 analogue engineered to evade the binding proteins that normally restrain IGF-1, injected to make muscle grow. That is the same axis, driven hard, in the same tissue — without monitoring, without a diagnosis, and without anybody counting what happens. No human study shows this causes sarcoma. Nobody has looked, and the target validation runs the other way.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    Mechano growth factor is an IGF-1 splice variant produced by muscle in response to loading, and rhabdomyosarcoma is a tumour of skeletal-muscle lineage. Same argument, same axis, arguably closer to the tissue in question.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically rather than locally, which is a different exposure profile but the same hormone.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Two distinct concerns. It is pro-angiogenic, and sarcomas are vascular tumours. More practically, it is injected — often locally, into muscle and around tendons, for lumps and injuries that have not been imaged. See the warning below.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Promotes cell migration and angiogenesis. Thymosin beta-4 expression has been correlated with metastatic potential in tumour studies.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Promotes fibroblast activity and collagen remodelling in vitro. Fibroblasts are the lineage several soft tissue sarcomas arise from.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    Raises GH and IGF-1. Approved for HIV lipodystrophy and not studied in any malignancy.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The practical warning first, because this site’s readers inject into muscle and get lumps. A soft tissue sarcoma usually presents as a painless, enlarging, deep-seated mass — and the standard rule is that any lump larger than about 5 cm, deep to the fascia, growing, or persisting beyond a few weeks needs imaging. Injection-site nodules, oil granulomas from cosmetic site enhancement, and post-injury haematomas are all common in this population and all look like reassuring explanations. A lump that does not resolve is not automatically an injection reaction, and a “muscle knot” that keeps growing is not a muscle knot. Sarcoma misdiagnosed as a haematoma is a recognised clinical trap, and it is likelier in someone with an obvious alternative explanation.

And do not let anyone cut it out casually. Unplanned excision of a sarcoma — removing it as if it were a benign lump, without imaging or margins — measurably worsens outcomes and often necessitates a bigger second operation. Suspected sarcomas should be imaged and biopsied through a specialist sarcoma centre, with the biopsy tract planned so the definitive surgery can remove it. The first operation determines the outcome, which is the single most important thing patients and non-specialist clinicians do not know about this disease.

Treatment is surgery with adequate margins, radiotherapy in many soft tissue sarcomas, and chemotherapy which is genuinely effective in some subtypes — osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma — and much less so in others. Subtype matters enormously: there are more than a hundred, they behave differently, and expert pathology review changes the diagnosis in a meaningful proportion of cases. Targeted options exist for specific subtypes: imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumour, which is one of oncology’s best targeted-therapy successes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors elsewhere, and NTRK inhibitors in fusion-positive tumours. Care at a specialist centre improves survival in sarcoma, which is not true to the same degree of every cancer, and is the reason referral matters more here than almost anywhere.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats sarcoma. Antibodies against the IGF-1 receptor were developed as treatment and reached phase 2 — which is the point.

Gastric & oesophageal cancer

Upper gastrointestinal cancers, frequently diagnosed late because the early symptoms are indigestion and reflux — which are exactly the symptoms several compounds in this library are promoted to treat. Gastric cancer is also one of the few cancers with a genuinely infectious cause, and therefore genuinely preventable.

8 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The most direct delayed-diagnosis risk in this library, more so than the colorectal version. BPC-157 is derived from a gastric juice protein and is marketed explicitly for stomach healing, gastritis, ulcers and reflux. Those are the presenting symptoms of gastric and oesophageal cancer. Dyspepsia that responds to something, then returns, is the classic history of a cancer diagnosed late. The alarm features that need endoscopy rather than treatment: difficulty or pain swallowing, unintentional weight loss, vomiting, iron deficiency anaemia, a palpable mass, and new persistent dyspepsia in anyone over about 55. Acting on those beats anything on this page by an enormous margin.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in gastrointestinal models, and the same objection applies: suppressing an inflammatory symptom is not the same as knowing what is causing it.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    A real interaction rather than a benefit. GLP-1 agonists delay gastric emptying, which can worsen reflux and cause vomiting — symptoms that overlap with the alarm features above and can therefore both mask them and mimic them. Obesity is separately an established risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, via reflux and Barrett’s oesophagus, so weight loss reduces risk through that route. New or worsening dysphagia on a GLP-1 is not a side effect to accept without assessment.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same delayed emptying, same reasoning.

  • Linaclotide Study

    Approved for constipation-predominant IBS. Upper GI alarm features are not IBS and need investigating first.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori in laboratory work, which is where the interest comes from. H. pylori eradication is achieved with proven antibiotic regimens and confirmed with a test of cure — an antimicrobial peptide with in vitro activity is not a substitute, and partial treatment of H. pylori is worse than none.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

  • Octreotide Study

    Used for acute variceal bleeding and in some upper GI bleeding contexts, and for hormone-secreting tumours of the stomach — which are neuroendocrine tumours, a different disease from gastric adenocarcinoma with a much better outlook.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Gastric cancer is substantially an infectious disease, and that makes it preventable. Helicobacter pylori is the dominant risk factor for non-cardia gastric cancer, and eradicating it reduces the risk of developing the cancer — demonstrated in randomised trials, and the basis for population screen-and-treat programmes in high-incidence countries. Testing is simple: a breath, stool or biopsy test. Eradication is a short antibiotic course. Confirming eradication afterwards matters, because resistance is now common enough that a single course often fails.

Oesophageal cancer splits in two. Adenocarcinoma is driven by reflux, obesity and Barrett’s oesophagus, and is rising in Western countries; Barrett’s is surveilled, and dysplasia within it is treated endoscopically, which prevents cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma is driven by smoking, alcohol and hot beverages, and predominates elsewhere in the world. The risk factors are different enough that the two diseases barely overlap epidemiologically.

Treatment is surgery for localised disease, usually with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before it, endoscopic resection for very early lesions, and — the meaningful recent change — immune checkpoint inhibitors and HER2-directed therapy, which have improved outcomes in advanced gastric and oesophageal cancer where progress had been slow for decades. Testing for HER2, PD-L1 and mismatch repair status is standard. Nutrition support is not an afterthought here: these cancers and their treatments both directly impair eating, and nutritional decline worsens everything else.

Other modifiable risk: smoking, heavy alcohol, salt-preserved foods, and low fruit and vegetable intake. Chronic proton pump inhibitor use for undiagnosed dyspepsia is a specific hazard — not because the drug causes cancer, but because it controls the symptom well enough to postpone the endoscopy.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats these cancers. H. pylori eradication with antibiotics is the intervention that prevents one of them.

Bladder & kidney cancer

Two urological cancers with one shared lesson: visible blood in the urine is never normal and never to be watched. Bladder cancer also has a risk factor almost nobody names correctly — smoking causes about half of cases.

7 compounds documented
  • Desmopressin Study

    Listed for a specific hazard. Desmopressin is approved for nocturia and reduces urine production, and nocturia is common, benign and usually treated symptomatically. But urinary symptoms are also how bladder cancer presents, and reducing urine output does not treat a tumour — it can make the frequency more tolerable while the cause goes unexamined. Anyone with visible haematuria, or unexplained microscopic haematuria over 45, needs urological assessment before symptomatic treatment. The hyponatraemia risk on its own page is a separate matter.

  • Terlipressin Study

    Vasopressin analogue used in hospital for bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome, not for urological cancer. Included because the vasopressin family keeps appearing in urinary contexts and the distinction is worth keeping clear.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Relevant for an unusual reason. Kidney cancer classically produces erythropoietin — it is a recognised cause of secondary polycythaemia, so a raised haematocrit can be a presenting sign of a renal tumour. That makes the erythropoietin axis genuinely connected to this disease, though not in a way that suggests a treatment. See the ESA boxed warning under leukaemia.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic — and renal cell carcinoma is among the most angiogenesis-dependent cancers there is, which is why anti-angiogenic drugs are a mainstay of treating it. Also promoted for bladder and kidney “healing” with no human data.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Obesity is an established risk factor for renal cell carcinoma, so weight reduction plausibly reduces risk. Not a treatment, and no outcome data.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Marketed for kidney detoxification, which describes nothing the kidney does. See chronic kidney disease.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Visible blood in the urine warrants investigation every time, even once, even painlessly, even if it clears. Painless visible haematuria is the classic presentation of bladder cancer and the single most important symptom in urology. It resolving is not reassurance — intermittent bleeding is characteristic. Investigation is cystoscopy plus imaging. This is the most actionable sentence on the page.

And the risk factor nobody names: smoking causes roughly half of all bladder cancers. Carcinogens are excreted in urine and sit against the bladder lining, which is the mechanism. People associate smoking with lung cancer and stop there — bladder, kidney, pancreas, oesophagus, stomach, cervix and several others are on that list too. Occupational exposure to aromatic amines in dye, rubber, paint and leather work is the other established cause, and it is the classic occupational cancer.

Bladder cancer is mostly non-muscle-invasive at diagnosis and treated by endoscopic resection with intravesical therapy — BCG, a live attenuated bacterial vaccine instilled into the bladder, remains one of the oldest and most effective immunotherapies in oncology, and predates the checkpoint inhibitors by decades. It requires long-term surveillance cystoscopy because recurrence is common. Muscle-invasive disease needs radical treatment — cystectomy or chemoradiotherapy — with chemotherapy beforehand, and advanced disease now responds to checkpoint inhibitors and the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin, another instance of the address-label design.

Kidney cancer is frequently found by accident — on a scan done for something else — and that is a good thing, because small incidentally-found tumours are highly curable by partial nephrectomy or ablation, and some are safely watched. The classic triad of flank pain, a mass and haematuria is a late presentation and now rare. Treatment of advanced disease has been transformed by combinations of checkpoint inhibitors with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Risk factors: smoking, obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats either. BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer predates modern immuno-oncology by decades and still works.

Brain tumours (glioma, glioblastoma & meningioma)

Primary tumours of the brain and its coverings, plus the far commoner brain metastases from cancers elsewhere. This is where this library’s central problem — getting a peptide to where it needs to act — stops being an abstraction, and where the best available answer to it still was not enough.

9 compounds documented
  • Semax Anecdotal

    The delivery claim, examined where it matters most. Semax is promoted for brain effects on the premise that intranasal administration reaches the central nervous system. Whether it does so in humans at meaningful concentrations is unresolved — and note what the paragraph below establishes: pharmaceutical companies built purpose-designed peptide shuttles to get molecules across the blood-brain barrier, demonstrated ten-fold brain accumulation, and still missed their efficacy endpoints. Nothing here treats a brain tumour, and a compound taken for cognitive symptoms may be treating the first sign of one.

  • Epitalon Theorized

    An unusually specific concern rather than a generic one. TERT promoter mutations — which switch telomerase back on — are among the most common genetic alterations in glioblastoma, present in the large majority of cases, and they are used diagnostically to classify these tumours. Epitalon is sold on a telomerase activation premise. Telomerase reactivation is not an incidental feature of this cancer; it is close to a defining one. See also leukaemia, where the only approved telomerase drug is an inhibitor.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic — and glioblastoma is among the most vascular tumours in the body, which is why bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is used in it. Promoting angiogenesis is the explicit opposite of one of the few systemic treatments this disease has. Also taken for headaches, which is a presenting symptom.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling contributes to glioma proliferation and invasion in laboratory work. The standing caution.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Promotes cell migration — and diffuse infiltration into surrounding brain is precisely what makes glioma impossible to fully resect.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    Genuinely relevant. High-dose dexamethasone is used continuously to control peritumoural oedema and reliably causes hyperglycaemia, sometimes severe. As in myeloma, insulin requirements track the steroid dose rather than staying flat.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial framing. Not studied here.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed to brain tumour patients for fatigue and cognition by infusion clinics. No evidence, and see the antioxidant caution under leukaemia regarding treatments that work through oxidative damage.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Same channel, same absence of evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

A peptide was built to solve the blood-brain barrier, it worked, and the drug still failed. That is the most useful thing on this page. Angiopep-2 is a peptide that crosses the barrier by receptor-mediated transcytosis through LRP-1 — a genuine, designed shuttle rather than a hopeful claim. Conjugating it to three paclitaxel molecules produced ANG1005, which achieved up to ten-fold greater brain accumulation than free paclitaxel. Then the phase 2 trial in recurrent high-grade glioma read out: the primary endpoints for response rate and progression-free survival were not met. It showed some activity in breast cancer brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease, and that is where its development continued.

Hold on to the shape of that result, because it applies to every “if only it could get into the brain” argument on this site. Delivery was solved and measured, and the tumour still did not care. Crossing the barrier is necessary. It is not sufficient.

And a peptide vaccine gives the other half of the lesson. Rindopepimut targets EGFRvIII, a mutant receptor found on glioblastoma cells and on nothing else — about as clean a tumour-specific target as exists. It was well tolerated and produced a robust anti-EGFRvIII immune response, exactly as designed. The phase 2 data looked promising. Then ACT IV randomised 754 patients and reported median overall survival of 20.0 months against 20.1 months for standard treatment alone, and was stopped early for futility. The vaccine did everything it was built to do immunologically and changed survival by negative one tenth of a month. Right target, real immune response, no benefit — and another phase 2 that did not survive phase 3.

Meningioma is the hormone-sensitive brain tumour, and this deserves attention from anyone taking exogenous hormones. Around 70% of meningiomas express progesterone receptors. High-dose progestin exposure is associated with a markedly raised risk — cyproterone acetate above 25 mg daily carries roughly an eleven-fold increase, with a clear dose-response relationship, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate a smaller but real one. Risk falls again when the drug is stopped, and some tumours regress. This is one of the better-documented links between a hormonal agent and a tumour, and it is a reason to know what you are taking and for how long.

For treatment: maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide in glioblastoma; extent of resection genuinely affects survival, which is why specialist neurosurgical centres matter. 5-ALA fluorescence guidance makes tumour tissue glow under blue light and improves the completeness of resection — another targeting trick, using a metabolic precursor rather than a peptide. Tumour treating fields add survival in glioblastoma. IDH-mutant gliomas are now a separate disease with a much better outlook and their own targeted drug, vorasidenib. Many meningiomas are simply observed. Glioblastoma remains a disease where honesty matters more than optimism, and where the gap between what is achievable and what is promised online is at its widest.

Symptoms worth acting on: new or progressively worsening headache, particularly waking or worse in the morning; a first seizure at any age; progressive weakness, speech disturbance or visual field loss; and personality or cognitive change noticed by others rather than by the person.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved peptide drug. Angiopep-2 remains the best-developed peptide shuttle across the blood-brain barrier and did not produce an approved therapy.

Head & neck cancer

Cancers of the mouth, throat, larynx, and related structures. The dominant story is that one of them is now a vaccine-preventable disease, and the practical one is that a non-healing mouth ulcer is a cancer symptom — which matters here because several compounds are marketed for exactly that.

8 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The delayed-diagnosis risk, and it is as direct as the gastric one. BPC-157 is promoted for oral and gum healing, mouth ulcers and mucosal repair. A mouth ulcer that has not healed in three weeks is the classic presentation of oral cancer — along with a persistent white or red patch, a lump in the neck, persistent hoarseness beyond three weeks, difficulty or pain swallowing, a loose tooth with no dental cause, and numbness of the lip or tongue. These need examining, not treating. Oral cancer is visible and reachable, which makes late diagnosis particularly avoidable and particularly costly.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in mucosal models, and oral mucositis during treatment is genuinely one of the worst toxicities in oncology. See the palifermin paragraph below for why a growth or repair signal in this setting is more complicated than it appears.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Promoted for mucosal and skin repair, including within radiotherapy fields. Nothing should be applied to skin inside a radiotherapy field without the radiation oncology team’s agreement, because some topical preparations alter surface dose. And the same tissue-growth question applies.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The same argument as sarcoma, from the other direction. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is driven substantially by EGFR signalling — which is why cetuximab, an antibody that blocks the EGFR receptor, is an established treatment. Growth factor receptor signalling in this tumour is something oncology spends money trying to switch off.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Present in saliva and oral innate defence, and implicated in tumour-promoting inflammation in some models. Direction unresolved, evidence absent.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing, in a cancer where immunotherapy genuinely works — but pembrolizumab works by releasing a specific brake on T-cell recognition of tumour, which is not what generic immune stimulation does.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Two opposite considerations, and both matter. Alcohol is a major risk factor for these cancers, and there is growing evidence that GLP-1 agonists reduce alcohol consumption — alongside the smoking cessation data, that is a plausible prevention route. But during or after treatment it inverts: these patients frequently cannot eat, and malnutrition and weight loss are among the strongest predictors of a bad outcome. An appetite-suppressing drug in someone with treatment-related dysphagia is actively harmful.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same reasoning both ways.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Oropharyngeal cancer caused by HPV is now largely a preventable disease, and this is the single most important fact on the page. HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer has risen substantially in Western countries, particularly in men, while smoking-related head and neck cancers have fallen. It behaves differently from the tobacco-driven form: it occurs in younger, often non-smoking patients and has a markedly better prognosis, enough that it is staged separately. HPV vaccination prevents the infection that causes it — a vaccine that prevents a cancer, as with hepatitis B and liver cancer. Vaccination of boys as well as girls is now standard in many countries, and this is why.

Tobacco and alcohol are the other cause, and together they are worse than the sum of their parts — the combination is synergistic rather than additive. Smokeless tobacco, betel quid and areca nut are major causes in South and Southeast Asia. Stopping smoking after diagnosis still improves outcomes.

On palifermin, because it is instructive. Palifermin is recombinant keratinocyte growth factor, and it is approved to reduce severe oral mucositis — but only in patients with haematological malignancies receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support. Randomised evidence shows it also reduces severe mucositis in head and neck cancer patients on postoperative chemoradiotherapy, and it is not approved for that. Consider why: this tumour is epithelium, and palifermin is an epithelial growth factor. Giving a growth factor to protect the tissue the cancer arose from raises exactly the question this library keeps asking about growth signalling — except here it is being asked by regulators about an approved drug.

Treatment is surgery, radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, with transoral robotic surgery reducing morbidity in selected cases, cetuximab where platinum is unsuitable, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent and metastatic disease. De-escalation trials in HPV-positive disease — giving less treatment to preserve function without losing cure — are a major research effort, and results have been mixed enough that de-escalation outside a trial is not standard.

Supportive care is not secondary here; it determines how the rest of life goes. Dental assessment and clearance before radiotherapy, because osteoradionecrosis of the jaw afterwards is severe and largely preventable. Nutrition planning and often a feeding tube, because these treatments make eating impossible for weeks. Speech and swallowing therapy started early rather than after problems appear. Xerostomia is permanent for many patients and affects everything from eating to dental health. The functional consequences — speech, swallowing, appearance, taste — are among the heaviest of any cancer, and this is where specialist multidisciplinary care makes the largest difference.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Palifermin is an approved protein for oral mucositis — in haematological malignancy, notably not in this one. Cetuximab blocks a growth factor receptor. The vaccine that prevents much of this disease is an HPV vaccine.

Bone metastases & skeletal complications

Secondary cancer deposits in bone, most often from breast, prostate, lung, kidney and thyroid primaries. It contains the most precise growth-signalling argument in this library, because the mechanism of bone metastasis is literally a stored IGF-1 reservoir being opened.

9 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    This is the mechanism, and it is worth reading slowly. Mineralised bone matrix is where the body stores growth factors — TGF-beta and IGF-1 among them. When osteoclasts resorb bone they release those stored factors locally. Tumour cells in bone respond by secreting signals that recruit and activate more osteoclasts, which resorb more bone, which releases more growth factor. This is called the vicious cycle, and it is the accepted model of how bone metastasis works. The skeleton is the largest reservoir of stored IGF-1 in the body, and the entire pathology here is that reservoir feeding a tumour. It is also why bisphosphonates and denosumab help in bone metastasis without killing a single cancer cell — they work by closing the tap. Introducing an engineered IGF-1 analogue built to evade its binding proteins is the exact opposite intervention.

  • Teriparatide Study

    Explicitly contraindicated, and this is the clearest contraindication in the library. Teriparatide is contraindicated in patients with bone metastases or skeletal malignancy. The reasoning follows directly from the paragraph above: an anabolic bone agent stimulates the exact bone remodelling that drives the cycle. Note how completely this inverts osteoporosis, where building bone is the goal — in malignant bone disease the objective is to suppress turnover, not stimulate it. Same skeleton, opposite strategy, and getting it the wrong way round is dangerous.

  • PEG-MGF Theorized

    IGF-1 splice variant, same reservoir, same cycle.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Raises IGF-1 systemically.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The delayed-diagnosis risk here has a specific and dangerous shape. This compound is promoted for bone and injury healing, and taken for exactly the sort of unexplained bone pain that bone metastasis causes. A pathological fracture is a bone that broke under a load it should have tolerated — a fracture from a minor tweak, a lift that should not have caused it, or no trauma at all. In this readership that will look like an ordinary training injury, and treating it as one is how a metastasis goes unrecognised. Bone pain that is worse at night, worse at rest, or progressive rather than mechanical is not a training injury pattern.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Same repair marketing, same objection, plus cell migration and angiogenesis.

  • Leuprolide Study

    Approved and genuinely central in prostate cancer, which is the commonest cause of bone metastasis in men — with the caveat that androgen deprivation itself causes bone loss, so bone protection runs alongside it rather than being optional. The testosterone flare at the start of GnRH-agonist treatment matters most in exactly this population, because a surge in someone with spinal deposits can precipitate cord compression.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Marrow infiltration causes anaemia. Read the erythropoietin boxed warning under leukaemia before reasoning from that.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    No role in the disease, and a caution: unintentional weight loss in someone with cancer is a prognostic marker, and an appetite-suppressing drug in that setting works against nutritional goals.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Two emergencies first, because recognising them is worth more than everything else on this page.

Metastatic spinal cord compression is the one that costs people the ability to walk, and the window is hours to days. New or worsening back pain in anyone with a history of cancer — particularly band-like pain, pain worse lying flat or at night, or pain with any leg weakness, numbness, unsteadiness, or bladder or bowel change — needs urgent MRI and urgent treatment with steroids, radiotherapy or surgery. Neurological function that is lost before treatment starts usually does not come back. Function preserved at the point of treatment usually is preserved. That is the entire argument for treating it as an emergency.

Hypercalcaemia of malignancy is the other. Confusion, drowsiness, thirst, excessive urination, constipation, nausea and profound fatigue in someone with cancer. It is common, it is treatable with fluids and intravenous bisphosphonates or denosumab, and it is frequently mistaken for the cancer simply progressing or for treatment side effects.

Bone-targeted therapy is standard and reduces skeletal complications — zoledronic acid or denosumab reduce fractures, cord compression, and the need for radiotherapy or surgery to bone. Two practical points that get missed: dental assessment before starting, because osteonecrosis of the jaw is a real if uncommon complication and is far easier to prevent than treat, exactly as in head and neck cancer radiotherapy; and calcium and vitamin D supplementation alongside denosumab, because hypocalcaemia is otherwise common.

And bone metastasis is where radioligand targeting appears again. Radium-223 is an alpha-emitting calcium mimic — the skeleton takes it up as if it were calcium, concentrating radiation in areas of high bone turnover, which is where the metastases are. Lutetium-177 PSMA does the same job through a peptide-targeted receptor route, as described under neuroendocrine tumours. Three different ways of writing an address on radiation, all of them working.

Otherwise: external beam radiotherapy, which is highly effective for painful bone metastases and often given as a single fraction; orthopaedic stabilisation of bones at risk of fracture, ideally before they break; and proper analgesia. Bone metastasis is frequently compatible with years of good-quality life, particularly in breast and prostate cancer, which is why the complications above are worth preventing rather than accepting.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Denosumab is an antibody; bisphosphonates and radium-223 are not peptides. The approved peptide relevant here is leuprolide, treating the primary disease. Teriparatide is contraindicated.

Cervical & anal cancer (HPV-related)

Cancers caused almost entirely by persistent human papillomavirus infection. Cervical cancer is the only common cancer that the World Health Organization has a formal strategy to eliminate, because vaccination and screening between them can prevent nearly all of it.

6 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    The most coherent rationale on this page, and still not a reason to use it. Most HPV infections are cleared by the immune system, and persistence — not infection — is what causes cancer; immunosuppressed people, including those with HIV, have far higher rates of both cervical and anal cancer. So cell-mediated immunity genuinely is the determining factor. That is an argument for treating immunosuppression where it exists and for vaccinating, not for an unstudied immune stimulant. There is no evidence it affects HPV clearance.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Antimicrobial peptide with activity in mucosal defence, and implicated both in viral clearance and in tumour-promoting inflammation depending on the model. No human evidence in HPV disease.

  • KPV Theorized

    Generic anti-inflammatory action. Cervical inflammation is not the mechanism here — viral oncoprotein-driven cell cycle disruption is.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Appears in cosmetic and intimate-wellness marketing. Nothing should be applied to a lesion that has not been examined, and cosmetic treatment of visible anogenital lesions is how diagnosis gets delayed.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    The delayed-diagnosis pattern again. Bleeding after sex, between periods or after the menopause; persistent discharge; and pelvic pain are cervical cancer symptoms. Anal bleeding, pain, a lump or a non-healing ulcer are anal cancer symptoms — and they are routinely attributed to haemorrhoids or fissures, by patients and clinicians alike. That misattribution is the commonest reason anal cancer is diagnosed late. Anything taken for those symptoms without an examination first buys delay.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    No role. Included only to note the epidemiology that surrounds this area: long-term combined oral contraceptive use is associated with a modest increase in cervical cancer risk, which declines after stopping, and is substantially outweighed by its protective effect against ovarian and endometrial cancer.

What actually has evidence for this condition

This is the closest medicine has come to eliminating a common cancer, and the tools already exist. HPV vaccination prevents the infection; where vaccination programmes reached girls before exposure, the effect on precancerous lesions and on cervical cancer itself has been dramatic. Vaccinating boys as well protects them against oropharyngeal, anal and penile cancers and improves protection overall. The vaccine works best given before any exposure, which is why it is offered in early adolescence and why that timing is not a judgement about anybody’s behaviour.

Screening changed, and the new version is better. Primary HPV testing has replaced or now precedes cytology in many programmes, because testing for the virus is more sensitive than looking at cells and identifies who needs closer attention. A negative HPV test is strongly reassuring for years, which is why intervals lengthened — that is a sign of a better test, not of reduced care. Self-sampling is being introduced in several countries and reaches people who do not attend for a speculum examination.

And screening here does not merely detect cancer early — it prevents it, in the same way colonoscopy does in colorectal cancer. Treating high-grade precancerous change in the cervix stops the cancer developing. Vaccinated people still need screening, because the vaccine does not cover every oncogenic type, and this is a common and consequential misunderstanding.

Anal cancer is rising, is caused by the same virus, and is markedly more common in people living with HIV and in men who have sex with men. Screening high-risk groups with anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy has evidence behind it — treating anal high-grade lesions reduces progression to cancer — though programmes remain patchy.

Treatment: surgery or chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer depending on stage, with immunotherapy added in advanced disease; anal cancer is treated primarily with chemoradiotherapy, which preserves the sphincter and avoids surgery in most patients. Smoking increases the risk of HPV persisting and progressing, which is one of the less well-known reasons to stop.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide is involved. The intervention that prevents these cancers is a vaccine — the second on this site, alongside hepatitis B and liver cancer.

Pituitary tumours

Almost always benign adenomas, and almost always consequential anyway — because the pituitary sits next to the optic nerves and controls every hormonal axis in the body. Several are treated with peptides, and one of them presents in a way this readership is uniquely likely to explain away.

9 compounds documented
  • Octreotide Study

    Approved for GH-secreting adenomas, covered in full under acromegaly. A somatostatin analogue that suppresses GH secretion where surgery has not achieved remission — available as short-acting injection, monthly depot and an oral delayed-release capsule.

  • Desmopressin Study

    Approved, and directly downstream of pituitary surgery. Transsphenoidal surgery and larger tumours can both damage the posterior pituitary or the stalk, causing arginine vasopressin deficiency — the inability to concentrate urine, with enormous urine volumes and unquenchable thirst. Desmopressin replaces the missing hormone and it is genuinely transformative. Post-operative sodium disturbance can swing in both directions in the days after surgery, which is why this is managed by an endocrine team rather than adjusted independently.

  • Sermorelin Theorized

    The point of this entry for most readers. GH secretagogues drive an axis that a pituitary adenoma may already be disrupting. Anyone using them has a plausible-sounding explanation ready for exactly the symptoms a pituitary tumour causes — fatigue, low libido, headaches, mood and body-composition change — and a reason to attribute abnormal pituitary bloodwork to their compounds. See the prolactin paragraph below.

  • CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Same axis, and the DAC form produces sustained rather than pulsatile GHRH exposure — see acromegaly for why that direction matters.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Same.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Acts upstream on the gonadotroph axis. In someone with an undiagnosed pituitary lesion, manipulating that axis adds a variable to an already confusing hormonal picture.

  • Oxytocin Theorized

    A posterior pituitary hormone, included for anatomy rather than treatment. Posterior pituitary function is what surgery threatens and what desmopressin replaces.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    GHRH analogue, same axis, approved for HIV lipodystrophy rather than anything pituitary.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Marketed with pineal-axis claims that are frequently muddled with pituitary function in community writing. The pineal and the pituitary are different glands doing different things, and neither claim has human data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The thing to know: a raised prolactin is how a prolactinoma announces itself, and this readership has a ready-made alternative explanation for it. In men, a prolactin-secreting adenoma causes low testosterone, reduced libido, erectile dysfunction, infertility and gynaecomastia — the exact cluster attributed to cycles, crashes, aromatisation and recovery. Several compounds and drugs used in this space genuinely do move prolactin, so an abnormal result has an obvious culprit. Obvious culprits are how unusual causes go unfound, which is the same trap described under testicular cancer and melanoma. A substantially raised prolactin — particularly with headache or any visual symptom — warrants a pituitary MRI rather than an assumption.

And prolactinoma is the tumour with the best treatment in neurosurgery, which is that it usually needs none. Cabergoline, a dopamine agonist tablet, normalises prolactin and shrinks the tumour in the great majority of patients — including large ones. Medical therapy is first-line; surgery is the exception. Long-term high-dose use warrants attention to cardiac valves and to impulse control disorders, which dopamine agonists can cause.

The other functioning tumours: GH-secreting adenomas cause acromegaly. ACTH-secreting adenomas cause Cushing’s disease — and pasireotide, a cyclohexapeptide somatostatin analogue, is approved for patients in whom surgery has failed or is not possible, alongside other medical options. Hyperglycaemia is a notable pasireotide side effect, which follows from somatostatin’s effect on insulin. TSH-secreting adenomas are rare.

Non-functioning adenomas cause trouble by size rather than secretion. They compress the optic chiasm, classically causing loss of the outer half of each visual field — which people frequently do not notice until they are bumping into things, because central vision is unaffected. Formal visual field testing is part of assessment. They also cause hypopituitarism by compressing normal gland, and replacing the missing hormones matters more than the tumour usually does. Cortisol replacement, if needed, must be started before thyroid hormone.

Pituitary apoplexy is the emergency: sudden severe headache, visual loss, double vision and collapse from bleeding into an adenoma. It needs immediate steroids and urgent assessment. And incidentalomas — pituitary lesions found on scans done for another reason — are common, usually harmless, and managed by checking hormone function and watching rather than operating.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide are approved peptides for functioning pituitary adenomas, and desmopressin replaces what surgery can destroy. Cabergoline — the most effective of the lot — is a small molecule.

Thymoma & thymic carcinoma

Rare tumours of the thymus — and the organ this library has two compounds named after. Thymoma also does something no other tumour does quite so clearly: it causes autoimmunity and immunodeficiency at the same time, in the same patient, which is the best available argument that “boosting immunity” is not a coherent instruction.

5 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    This is where the compound comes from. Thymosin alpha-1 was isolated from thymosin fraction 5, a partially purified extract of bovine thymus, in work dating to the 1960s and 70s. It is a fragment of the signalling chemistry of the organ that educates T cells. So a tumour of the thymus is the closest thing in oncology to a disease of its tissue of origin — and the honest position is that nobody has studied whether administering a thymic peptide to someone with a thymic tumour, or with the immune syndromes it causes, is helpful, harmful or irrelevant. Given that thymoma produces both excessive autoimmunity and defective antibody production simultaneously, it is not even obvious which direction “help” would point in.

  • TB-500 Theorized

    Same extract, same organ. Thymosin beta-4 was the other sequenced constituent to come out of thymosin fraction 5. Two of the most widely used compounds in this library trace to a single calf thymus preparation, which is a fact more people using them should know. Its own concerns — cell migration and angiogenesis — apply here as everywhere in oncology.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in autoimmune mechanisms. Thymoma is already generating autoimmunity without assistance.

  • KPV Theorized

    Generic anti-inflammatory action against a specific and unusual immunological lesion.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The thymus is where developing T cells are taught not to attack the body, and a tumour of it breaks that education in both directions at once. Roughly 20–30% of thymoma patients have myasthenia gravis — autoantibodies against the neuromuscular junction causing fatigable weakness, drooping eyelids, double vision, and in severe cases weakness of the muscles used to swallow and breathe. Around 6–11% develop Good syndrome: adult-onset hypogammaglobulinaemia with susceptibility to opportunistic infection — an immunodeficiency. A smaller proportion develop pure red cell aplasia, where the marrow stops making red cells. Lichen planus and limbic encephalitis also occur.

Sit with that combination for a moment. The same organ failure produces too much immune activity against the self and too little against pathogens, in the same person. The immune system is not a dial running from low to high. It is a system of recognition and tolerance, and it fails by misdirection rather than by amplitude — which is exactly why every entry on this site that mentions “immune support” asks which direction is meant.

For treatment: complete surgical resection is the main determinant of outcome, and thymectomy also improves myasthenia gravis — including, in randomised evidence, in some patients without thymoma. Radiotherapy for incompletely resected or invasive disease, chemotherapy for advanced disease, and a role for targeted agents and immunotherapy in thymic carcinoma — though checkpoint inhibitors carry an unusually high rate of severe immune-related toxicity in thymoma specifically, which follows directly from the autoimmune predisposition described above. Many thymomas are found incidentally on chest imaging. Long follow-up is needed because recurrence can be late.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved peptide. The peptides named after this organ came out of an extract of it and treat nothing about its tumours.

Adrenal tumours & phaeochromocytoma

Tumours of the adrenal glands — mostly harmless incidental findings, occasionally hormone-secreting, rarely malignant. One of them carries a genuine acute hazard relevant to compounds in this library, because a catecholamine-secreting tumour plus a stimulant is a hypertensive emergency.

6 compounds documented
  • Tesofensine Theorized

    The specific hazard on this page. Phaeochromocytoma secretes adrenaline and noradrenaline, and the classic presentation is episodic headache, sweating, palpitations and hypertension — which is also what a stimulant does, and therefore what an undiagnosed case looks like when the person is already taking one. Tesofensine is a triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor. Sympathomimetic drugs can precipitate a hypertensive crisis in phaeochromocytoma, and the symptoms being attributed to the compound is precisely how the tumour stays undiagnosed. Severe episodic hypertension with headache and sweating is not a side effect to titrate around.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Unusually specific here rather than generic. Adrenocortical carcinoma characteristically overexpresses IGF-2, and the IGF axis is prominent enough in this tumour that IGF-1 receptor inhibitors were taken into clinical trials for it. This is another case, like sarcoma, where the pharmaceutical read on IGF signalling in the tumour was to try to block it.

  • Octreotide Study

    Relevant through targeting rather than hormone control — see below. Somatostatin receptor expression is what makes peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy possible in metastatic paraganglioma.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    Two connections. Mitotane and adrenal insufficiency change glucocorticoid status and therefore glucose handling. And IGF-2-secreting tumours can cause non-islet-cell tumour hypoglycaemia — IGF-2 in excess acts on the insulin receptor, producing low blood sugar with suppressed insulin, which is a diagnostic clue worth knowing exists.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic, no data, and taken for the vague fatigue and abdominal symptoms these tumours can cause.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial framing. Note that hereditary paraganglioma is frequently caused by mutations in succinate dehydrogenase — a mitochondrial enzyme complex — which makes this the rare case where a mitochondrial mechanism is genuinely central to the tumour. That is a reason for genetic testing, not for a mitochondrial peptide.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Most adrenal masses are incidentalomas — found on scans done for something else, benign, and needing only two questions answered: is it secreting anything, and does it look malignant. Biochemical screening covers cortisol excess, aldosterone excess and catecholamine excess. Mild autonomous cortisol secretion is commoner than once thought and is associated with hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis and cardiovascular risk even without the classic Cushingoid appearance.

Phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma have one rule that dominates management: alpha blockade before anything else. Operating on — or even handling — an unblocked catecholamine-secreting tumour can precipitate a life-threatening hypertensive crisis, so alpha-adrenergic blockade is established first and beta blockade only afterwards, never before. Beta blockade alone in an unblocked phaeochromocytoma can make the crisis worse, by leaving alpha-mediated vasoconstriction unopposed. Around 40% of these tumours are hereditary, which makes genetic testing standard and has implications for relatives.

And metastatic paraganglioma adds two more entries to this site’s collection of targeting tricks. Lutetium-177 DOTATATE works through somatostatin receptors, exactly as in neuroendocrine tumours. Iobenguane I-131 — approved as Azedra — uses a completely different route: MIBG is a noradrenaline analogue, taken up by the same transporter the tumour uses to handle catecholamines. Two independent addresses on the same tumour, one peptide and one neurotransmitter mimic. Catecholamine release during treatment is a recognised complication and is managed accordingly.

Adrenocortical carcinoma is rare and aggressive; treatment is surgery by an experienced centre, mitotane, and chemotherapy for advanced disease. It frequently secretes cortisol, androgens or both — rapid onset of virilisation or Cushingoid features over months, rather than years, is the pattern that should prompt urgent investigation. That matters for this readership: rapid virilising change has an obvious alternative explanation in someone using androgens, and obvious explanations are how rare causes get missed.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Lutetium-177 DOTATATE is an approved peptide-targeted radioligand used here. Iobenguane is a catecholamine analogue, not a peptide.

Uveal melanoma & rare skin cancers

Melanoma of the eye, and the uncommon skin cancers that are not basal cell, squamous cell or cutaneous melanoma. Uveal melanoma also carries a genuinely new idea for this library: a drug whose target is a peptide fragment — not a receptor, not a hormone, but a nine-amino-acid piece of protein displayed on the cell surface.

5 compounds documented
  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    The honest answer to a question this site should expect. Uveal melanoma arises from melanocytes in the eye — the same cell lineage as skin melanoma, and melanocortin receptors are present there. But uveal melanoma is a different disease from cutaneous melanoma: it has a distinct genetic profile, ultraviolet exposure is not its dominant cause, and it spreads characteristically to the liver. There are no case reports linking melanotan to uveal melanoma, and it would be dishonest to imply otherwise. The documented harms are cutaneous and are set out under melanoma. What is fair to say is that this compound stimulates the lineage from which both arise, and that a regular eye examination is worthwhile regardless.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Melanocortin agonist and a melanotan-II metabolite. Same lineage argument, more receptor selectivity, no ocular evidence.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Used topically on the face, and a caution: a persistent, bleeding, crusting or non-healing lesion — particularly on the head, neck or a sun-exposed area — should be examined rather than treated cosmetically. Merkel cell carcinoma in particular can look deceptively unremarkable.

  • KPV Theorized

    Alpha-MSH fragment without melanotropic potency — see the distinction drawn under melanoma.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Tebentafusp does something no other drug on this site does, and it is worth understanding because it reveals a third role for peptides in cancer. Every cell continuously displays fragments of its own internal proteins on HLA molecules at its surface — that is how T cells inspect what is happening inside a cell they cannot otherwise see. Tebentafusp is an engineered T-cell receptor fused to an anti-CD3 fragment: it recognises a nine-residue fragment of gp100, a melanocyte protein, presented on HLA-A*02:01, and physically drags a T cell to it. It was approved in January 2022, improved overall survival with a hazard ratio for death of 0.51, and was the first drug ever approved specifically for metastatic uveal melanoma — as well as the first T-cell receptor bispecific approved for any solid tumour.

Note what the peptide is doing there. In radioligand therapy the peptide is the address label. In prostate and breast cancer a peptide hormone is the switch. Here the peptide is the target itself — which also means the drug only works in people with the right HLA type, and HLA testing determines eligibility.

Uveal melanoma is otherwise a difficult disease. It is usually found by an optometrist or ophthalmologist rather than by symptoms — which is a reason to have eyes examined periodically — and treated with plaque brachytherapy or proton therapy, preserving the eye in most cases, or enucleation for large tumours. Local control is generally excellent and that does not prevent metastasis, which appears years later and usually in the liver. Prognosis is determined largely by tumour genetics, particularly monosomy 3 and BAP1 status, which can be established from a biopsy at treatment.

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer, usually on sun-exposed skin in older or immunosuppressed people, and most cases are driven by Merkel cell polyomavirus. It responds strikingly well to checkpoint inhibitors, which transformed its outlook. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is far commoner and usually straightforward, but it is genuinely dangerous in the immunosuppressed — organ transplant recipients develop it at many times the background rate and need dermatological surveillance. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and cutaneous lymphomas are rarer still and are treated in specialist centres.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Tebentafusp is an engineered T-cell receptor fusion protein, not a peptide drug — but its target is a peptide, which is the point.

Biliary tract cancer (cholangiocarcinoma & gallbladder)

Cancers of the bile ducts and gallbladder — uncommon, usually diagnosed late, and rising in incidence. It carries a direct connection to the most-used drug class in this library, because GLP-1 agonists increase gallbladder disease, and gallstones are the dominant risk factor for gallbladder cancer.

7 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    A real labelled effect, and the honest version of what it does and does not mean. GLP-1 agonists increase the risk of gallbladder disease — gallstones and cholecystitis — through delayed gallbladder emptying and, separately, through rapid weight loss, which independently promotes stone formation. That is on the label. Gallstones and chronic gallbladder inflammation are in turn the dominant risk factor for gallbladder cancer. Do not over-read this: gallbladder cancer is rare, the interval from stones to cancer is measured in decades, and no study shows GLP-1 agonists cause it. The practical point is smaller and more useful — right upper abdominal pain on a GLP-1 needs assessing rather than assuming, because gallbladder disease is a known effect and not merely nausea.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same class effect, same reasoning, and greater weight loss means the weight-related component is at least as relevant.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Investigational, larger weight effects still, same expected class issue.

  • Octreotide Study

    Worth knowing as a mirror image. Somatostatin analogues also cause gallstones, and for the same mechanistic reason — reduced gallbladder motility. Two entirely different peptide classes converging on the same complication through the same mechanism is a useful reminder that gallbladder emptying is under peptide hormone control, principally by cholecystokinin.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Marketed for liver and digestive support. Painless jaundice — yellowing of the eyes or skin without pain — is the presentation of biliary obstruction and is a red flag, not a detox target. Pale stools, dark urine and itching accompany it. This needs imaging the same week.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Liver and gallbladder “flush” and detoxification marketing is heavy in this area and describes nothing physiological. See liver cancer.

What actually has evidence for this condition

These cancers are defined by chronic inflammation of the biliary tree. Risk factors are gallstones and chronic cholecystitis for gallbladder cancer; and for cholangiocarcinoma, primary sclerosing cholangitis, liver fluke infection in endemic regions of Southeast Asia, choledochal cysts, hepatolithiasis and chronic liver disease. Incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has been rising in Western countries.

The genuinely good news is molecular. Biliary tract cancer went from having essentially no targeted options to being one of the better examples of precision oncology in a decade: FGFR2 fusions respond to FGFR inhibitors such as pemigatinib and futibatinib; IDH1 mutations to ivosidenib; HER2 amplification, BRAF V600E and NTRK fusions all have matched agents; and mismatch-repair-deficient tumours respond to immunotherapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling is now standard at diagnosis in advanced disease, and it changes treatment often enough to be worth doing early rather than after chemotherapy fails. Adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy has also improved first-line outcomes.

Surgery is the only curative option and only a minority are resectable at diagnosis; liver transplantation has a role in selected hilar cholangiocarcinoma at specialist centres. Biliary drainage and management of obstruction dominate quality of life, and cholangitis is a recurrent risk. Gallbladder cancer is frequently discovered incidentally in a gallbladder removed for stones, which is one of the few routes to an early diagnosis.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide treats these. Two peptide classes in this library — incretins and somatostatin analogues — both promote the gallstone disease that precedes one of them.

Mesothelioma

Cancer of the lining of the lung or abdomen, caused overwhelmingly by asbestos exposure decades earlier. It is here for completeness and for one practical reason — the latency is so long that people who no longer think of themselves as exposed are the ones who get it.

5 compounds documented
  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing, in a cancer where immunotherapy genuinely works — checkpoint inhibition improved survival here. As elsewhere, releasing a specific brake on T-cell recognition is not the same as generic immune stimulation, and there is no evidence for the latter.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Promoted for lung and chest symptoms. Breathlessness with a pleural effusion, or persistent chest wall pain, in anyone with a history of asbestos exposure needs investigating.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Untested.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in chronic inflammatory processes in the pleura. No evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The latency is the point: typically 20 to 50 years between asbestos exposure and diagnosis. That means the exposure was often brief, occupational, decades ago, and long forgotten — construction, shipbuilding, insulation, boiler work, demolition, plumbing, electrical work, or living with someone who came home in dusty overalls. Anyone with unexplained breathlessness, a pleural effusion or persistent chest pain should be asked about it, and should mention it unprompted, because the exposure history changes what the doctor is looking for.

Diagnosis needs adequate tissue, usually by thoracoscopy rather than a needle. Treatment: immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations improved survival over chemotherapy in the first-line setting, which was the first meaningful advance in many years; chemotherapy remains standard for some; surgery is used selectively and its role remains debated. Effusion management — drainage, indwelling catheters or pleurodesis — makes a substantial difference to symptoms and is sometimes the most valuable intervention available. Peritoneal mesothelioma is treated differently, with cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy in selected patients, and has a better outlook than the pleural form.

There are usually compensation entitlements — statutory schemes, industrial injury benefits, or civil claims — and these are frequently unclaimed. Specialist nurses and asbestos support groups exist in most countries with an industrial history, and raising it early matters because the process takes time.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: None. Asbestos control is the intervention that works, and it works before the disease rather than after.

Cancer of unknown primary

Metastatic cancer where the original site cannot be identified despite investigation. It is included because it is commoner than most of the rare cancers above, and because it is the situation in which people are most likely to reach for anything at all.

6 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    The standing caution, in a situation where the tumour biology is by definition not fully characterised — which makes any growth-signalling exposure a less quantifiable risk rather than a smaller one.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Widely reached for. No evidence in any malignancy.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune framing. Immunotherapy has a genuine role here where the molecular features support it — which is a specific decision made on tissue testing, not a general immune intervention.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed hard to people in exactly this position. No evidence, real cost.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Same channel, same absence of evidence, and see the antioxidant caution under leukaemia.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Telomerase activation claims in an active malignancy.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The diagnosis has changed meaning, and mostly for the better. Comprehensive immunohistochemistry, modern imaging and — increasingly — molecular and genomic profiling now identify a likely origin or an actionable alteration in a substantial proportion of cases that would once have been left unexplained. Trials of profiling-guided treatment have reported better outcomes than empirical chemotherapy in some settings. The first thing worth asking is whether comprehensive molecular profiling has been done, because it is the step most likely to change what happens next.

Certain presentations behave as recognisable diseases and are treated as such with good outcomes — isolated axillary nodal disease in a woman managed as breast cancer, midline disease in a young man as a germ cell tumour, isolated neck nodes with squamous histology as head and neck cancer, and peritoneal disease in a woman as ovarian cancer. Identifying one of these favourable subsets matters enormously, because they are treated with intent rather than empirically.

This is also the setting where the gap between what is offered privately and what is evidenced is widest. Uncertainty, urgency and the absence of a clear plan are precisely the conditions under which unproven treatments are sold. A second opinion at a specialist centre, and a clear conversation about whether the goal is cure, control or comfort, are worth more than anything on this page — and early palliative care alongside active treatment improves quality of life and in some trials survival, which is worth knowing because it is often mistakenly heard as giving up.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Not applicable. Treatment follows the molecular profile and the clinical pattern.

Cancer cachexia & supportive care

Inflammation-driven wasting that does not respond to nutrition alone, and the chemotherapy toxicities that limit dose intensity.

8 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    Androgen deprivation — the backbone of systemic treatment in hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer. A GnRH agonist that suppresses the axis by overstimulating it, after an initial testosterone flare that can be dangerous in metastatic bone disease.

  • Octreotide Study

    Controls the hormonal syndromes of neuroendocrine tumours and, in PROMID and CLARINET, slowed tumour progression itself. Its receptor affinity is also what makes peptide receptor radionuclide therapy possible.

  • Ipamorelin Theorized

    Ghrelin receptor agonism drives appetite; the ghrelin agonist anamorelin has been through cachexia trials and improved weight without clearly improving function or survival.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is the natural extension of its small-fibre neuropathy trials.

  • KPV Theorized

    Oral mucositis, on an anti-inflammatory rationale.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed for mucositis and gut toxicity — with the angiogenesis caution above applying in full.

  • Glutathione Theorized

    Studied for platinum-induced neuropathy with inconsistent results, and with a live concern that antioxidants may blunt the efficacy of some chemotherapies.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial protection framing.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Multimodal cachexia management — nutritional support, resistance exercise where tolerated, treatment of reversible contributors — plus oncology-directed treatment of the underlying disease, which is the only thing that reverses cachexia. Supportive care is a specialist field with its own evidence base; the relevant conversation is with an oncology team, not a supplier.

Antioxidant and immune-modulating supplements can interact with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This is one of the few places on this page where an intervention that is harmless in isolation can reduce the effectiveness of curative treatment.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Goserelin and triptorelin (GnRH agonists), degarelix and relugolix (antagonists, no flare), lanreotide (depot somatostatin analogue) and lutetium-177 dotatate (peptide receptor radionuclide therapy). Leuprolide and octreotide are now in this library.

Group 07

Reproductive, sexual & urological

Contains one of the few compounds in this library with FDA approval for the use people actually want it for.

Sexual dysfunction & low libido

Central rather than vascular mechanisms — which is what makes this class distinct from the PDE5 inhibitors and why it works in people those do not help.

6 compounds documented
  • PT-141 Study

    Approved as bremelanotide (Vyleesi) for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women, on randomised trials. Acts centrally at melanocortin receptors. The most legitimate compound in this section by a distance.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    The unselective predecessor — erectile and libido effects were the observed side effect that led to PT-141 being developed as a separate drug. Carries the pigmentation, nausea and naevus concerns that PT-141 does not.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Study

    Human research studies at Imperial College reported effects on sexual and attraction-related brain processing, in a research setting rather than a therapeutic one.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect: weight loss improves erectile function and testosterone in men with obesity, which is a real effect through an unglamorous route.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    Monoamine effects on libido are reported in both directions.

  • Oxytocin Anecdotal

    A large consumer market in intranasal oxytocin rests on trust and intimacy claims. The most rigorous trial in the wider literature — 24 weeks in autism — found no difference from placebo, and only a small, poorly characterised fraction of a nasal dose reaches the brain.

What actually has evidence for this condition

For erectile dysfunction: PDE5 inhibitors, which are effective, cheap and well understood — and an ED workup that treats the symptom as a cardiovascular warning sign, because it frequently is. For low desire: relationship and psychological factors, medication review (SSRIs in particular), treatment of depression, sleep, and testosterone assessment where genuinely indicated.

Fertility, hypogonadism & the HPG axis

The hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis is a feedback system, and most interventions that target one node produce a compensatory response at another.

6 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    The same axis, driven the other way. Continuous GnRH exposure downregulates the pituitary receptor and shuts the axis down — used for prostate cancer, endometriosis, fibroids and central precocious puberty. Short-acting antagonists from the same family (cetrorelix, ganirelix) are standard in assisted reproduction.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Study

    The most physiologically interesting entry: kisspeptin is upstream of GnRH and is the switch that starts puberty. Human research use includes triggering oocyte maturation in IVF with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation than the standard trigger.

  • Liraglutide Study

    Restores ovulation in PCOS through weight and insulin sensitivity. See the PCOS entry for the contraception consequence.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Same, with the same pregnancy contraindication.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH has a permissive role in reproductive function; the community use is not for fertility.

  • PT-141 Study

    Desire rather than fertility.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Fertility problems warrant a workup on both sides of the couple before any intervention — semen analysis, ovulation assessment, tubal patency. Letrozole or clomifene for ovulation induction, gonadotrophins, IVF. In male hypogonadism, testosterone replacement suppresses spermatogenesis and is the wrong treatment for anyone seeking conception; hCG and selective oestrogen receptor modulators exist precisely for that reason.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Cetrorelix and ganirelix — short-acting GnRH antagonists that prevent a premature LH surge in assisted reproduction. hCG and selective oestrogen receptor modulators where fertility is the goal.

Gynaecomastia

Glandular breast tissue development in men, caused by a shifted balance between oestrogen and androgen signalling. It is the most common visible endocrine sign in this readership, it is usually explicable, and the risk is exactly that — that the obvious explanation is accepted without checking the others.

6 compounds documented
  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Drives the reproductive axis upstream of GnRH, raising LH and therefore testosterone — and testosterone aromatises to oestradiol. Anything that raises testosterone raises oestradiol too, which is the mechanism behind most compound-associated gynaecomastia and behind the entire post-cycle aromatase-inhibitor culture.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    No direct role. Relevant because obesity increases aromatase activity in adipose tissue, converting androgens to oestrogen — the same mechanism described under breast cancer and endometrial cancer. Much of what is called gynaecomastia in higher-body-fat men is partly or wholly fat rather than gland.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Weight loss reduces aromatase activity and can improve the fatty component. It will not remove established glandular tissue, which is a fibrous structure that does not respond to weight loss — a distinction worth understanding before spending a year trying.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH-axis compounds do not directly cause gynaecomastia. Listed because they are commonly stacked with the compounds that do, which muddies attribution.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    No causal role. Included because sexual dysfunction and gynaecomastia arriving together is a pattern that points at the endocrine causes below rather than at either symptom alone.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    No direct role. The standing caution applies as it does to breast tissue generally.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The single most important thing on this page: an obvious cause does not exclude a serious one. This is the third time this pattern appears on this site, and it is the same each time. Gynaecomastia in someone using androgens has an explanation that is almost certainly correct — and it is also a presenting sign of a hormone-secreting testicular tumour, of a prolactinoma, of liver disease, of hyperthyroidism, and of chronic kidney disease. The version that needs urgent attention is: rapid onset, one side only, a hard or fixed lump rather than diffuse tissue, tenderness that is severe, nipple discharge, skin changes, or any accompanying testicular lump, swelling or asymmetry. Examine the testicles when you find gynaecomastia. Every time.

And male breast cancer exists. It is uncommon — around 1% of breast cancers — but it is real, it presents later and does worse because nobody expects it, and it is more likely in men with BRCA2 mutations or a family history. A firm, fixed, painless lump that is off-centre from the nipple, or any nipple retraction, discharge or skin change, needs imaging rather than reassurance.

The other causes worth knowing: puberty, where it is very common and usually resolves within a couple of years; older age, where it is common and often related to medication and body composition; and drugs, which are the most frequently missed cause — spironolactone, cimetidine and proton pump inhibitors, some antipsychotics via prolactin, antiretrovirals, finasteride, and alcohol and cannabis. Hypogonadism of any cause — see hypogonadism — does it too.

Treatment depends entirely on how long it has been there. Early glandular proliferation, within roughly the first year, is inflammatory and potentially reversible — removing the cause, and sometimes tamoxifen, can work. After that it fibroses, and no drug reverses it; surgery is the only option that removes established gland. That timeline is why acting early matters far more than which agent gets chosen, and why the common approach of waiting to see whether it settles frequently produces the outcome people were trying to avoid.

Investigation for a new case is straightforward and worth doing properly: examination including the testicles, and blood tests for testosterone, oestradiol, LH, FSH, prolactin, hCG, thyroid, liver and kidney function. An hCG result must be interpreted knowing whether you have injected hCG — see testicular cancer, where that exact confusion is documented.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No approved drug treatment; tamoxifen is used off-label in early disease and surgery is definitive. The peptides relevant here are the ones that raise testosterone and therefore oestradiol.

Pregnancy, conception & breastfeeding

Not a condition — the situation in which the answer for essentially everything in this library is the same, and the reason for it is not squeamishness. Almost nothing here has been studied in pregnancy, and the few compounds with real obstetric uses are hospital drugs.

9 compounds documented
  • Oxytocin Study

    The exception that proves the rule, and it is nothing like the community use. Oxytocin is genuinely central to obstetric care — inducing and augmenting labour, and preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage, where it saves lives. It is given intravenously by titrated infusion, in hospital, with continuous fetal monitoring, because excessive uterine stimulation can cause fetal distress and uterine rupture. Intranasal oxytocin bought for mood or bonding is a completely different proposition, and using anything that stimulates the uterus outside that setting is dangerous.

  • Semaglutide Study

    Stop before conceiving, and plan the timing. GLP-1 agonists are not recommended in pregnancy — animal reproductive toxicity, no adequate human data, and the additional problem that the substantial weight loss and reduced intake they cause are not what a pregnancy needs. Manufacturers advise discontinuing in advance of a planned pregnancy, with the interval depending on the agent’s half-life; semaglutide’s is long, so the advised gap is measured in weeks to months. Fertility frequently improves with weight loss — including in PCOS — so unplanned pregnancy on these drugs is a real and recurring scenario. If you could become pregnant, use reliable contraception and discuss stopping before trying.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same, plus a specific interaction that catches people out. Tirzepatide can reduce the effectiveness of oral contraceptives through delayed gastric emptying, and the guidance is to switch to a non-oral method or add a barrier method for four weeks after starting and after each dose increase. That is on the label and it is widely unknown.

  • Leuprolide Study

    Used in fertility treatment protocols under specialist control, and otherwise contraindicated in pregnancy. Not a compound to encounter outside that setting.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Central to reproductive physiology and studied in fertility research, including as a trigger in IVF protocols. That is a research and specialist context, not a self-directed one.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Specifically inadvisable. Pregnancy already causes hyperpigmentation — melasma, linea nigra, darkening of naevi — through hormonal effects on melanocytes. Adding a melanocortin agonist compounds that, and the surveillance problem becomes worse at exactly the time when changing moles most need honest interpretation.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Growth factor signalling during fetal development, with no safety data of any kind. The absence of studies is not reassurance.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    No pregnancy safety data. The GH axis changes substantially in pregnancy on its own, driven by placental hormones.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No human pregnancy data. Widely used by people who may become pregnant without the question being raised.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The default answer is no, and the reason is structural rather than cautious. Pregnant women are excluded from almost all clinical trials, so for most compounds there is not evidence of safety — there is no evidence either way. That is not the same as “probably fine”. Thalidomide is the reason this field is conservative, and the conservatism is earned. For research-grade material the position is worse still, because purity, identity and contamination are unverified even before the pregnancy question arises — see injection safety.

What genuinely helps before and during pregnancy is unglamorous and well established: folic acid started before conception, which prevents neural tube defects and needs to be taken before the pregnancy is known; vitamin D; iodine sufficiency; stopping smoking and alcohol; reviewing all existing medication with a doctor rather than stopping it unilaterally, because untreated maternal illness carries its own risks; and vaccination against influenza, COVID-19, pertussis and RSV, which protects the newborn as well.

Some existing treatments must be changed before conception, not after a positive test. Valproate, isotretinoin, ACE inhibitors and ARBs, methotrexate and warfarin all require planning. Thyroid replacement usually needs increasing early in pregnancy — see hypothyroidism — and under-replacement affects fetal neurodevelopment. Adequately treated diabetes, epilepsy, and autoimmune disease all have good outcomes with planning and poor ones without it.

For men, this page is not irrelevant. Anabolic steroid and testosterone use suppresses spermatogenesis and is a common and frequently unrecognised cause of infertility — recovery takes months after stopping and is not always complete. Anyone trying to conceive should raise their compound use with the fertility clinic, because it changes the investigation entirely, and it is one of the more reversible causes when it is identified. See fertility and hypogonadism.

In breastfeeding, the same absence of data applies to almost everything here. Many conventional medicines are compatible with breastfeeding and specialist information services exist to answer that question properly — which is a better route than stopping breastfeeding unnecessarily or guessing.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Oxytocin is an approved and essential obstetric peptide, used in hospital. Nothing else in this library has established safety in pregnancy or lactation.

Postpartum haemorrhage & uterine atony

A leading cause of maternal death worldwide, and one of the places where a nine-residue peptide has done more measurable good than almost anything else in this library.

3 compounds documented
  • Oxytocin Study

    A first-line uterotonic for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage, and approved for medically indicated induction and augmentation of labour. Carries a boxed warning stating it is not indicated for elective induction. The heat-stable analogue carbetocin extends the same benefit to settings without a reliable cold chain.

  • Desmopressin Study

    Not a uterotonic. Relevant because it raises factor VIII and von Willebrand factor several-fold and is used haemostatically in mild haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease type 1 — conditions that complicate obstetric bleeding.

  • Terlipressin Theorized

    Can induce uterine contractions and can cause fetal harm. It appears here as a contraindication rather than as a treatment.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Active management of the third stage of labour — prophylactic uterotonic, controlled cord traction, uterine massage — reduces postpartum haemorrhage and is standard practice. For established bleeding: sequential uterotonics (oxytocin, ergometrine, misoprostol, carboprost), tranexamic acid on the strength of the WOMAN trial, uterine tamponade, and surgical or radiological intervention where those fail. Oxytocin and carbetocin are both on the WHO Essential Medicines List for this reason.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Carbetocin (heat-stable oxytocin analogue). Ergometrine and carboprost are not peptides but are part of the same treatment sequence.

Perimenopause & postmenopause

Declining and then absent ovarian oestrogen production, producing vasomotor symptoms, sleep disruption, genitourinary changes, accelerated bone loss and a shift in body composition toward visceral fat. Peri- and postmenopause are different problems: the first is fluctuation, the second is deficiency.

8 compounds documented
  • Kisspeptin-10 Study

    The most important entry here, and not for the reason people expect. Kisspeptin is co-expressed with neurokinin B and dynorphin in hypothalamic KNDy neurons, which respond to oestrogen withdrawal and project to the thermoregulatory centre — the circuit that produces hot flushes. That biology produced two approved drugs, and they work by blocking the neighbouring neurokinin-3 receptor rather than by giving anyone kisspeptin.

  • Teriparatide Study

    Approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis at high fracture risk, with randomised fracture-reduction data. Bone loss accelerates sharply after menopause, and this is the anabolic peptide that addresses it.

  • Semaglutide Study

    The menopausal shift toward visceral fat is real and metabolically consequential. The incretin class has the largest pharmacological effect on it, with cardiovascular outcome data — though nothing in the class has been trialled specifically in a menopausal population for that indication.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same argument, larger weight effect. Note the labelled reduction in oral contraceptive effectiveness, which matters in perimenopause where contraception is still required.

  • GHK-Cu Study

    Skin thickness, collagen density and elasticity fall measurably after menopause. Topical GHK-Cu has human evidence for those endpoints — applied to skin, which is how it was studied.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Anecdotal

    Marketed for menopausal body composition and energy. GH secretagogues have no menopause-specific evidence, and the lean-mass-versus-function problem applies here as everywhere.

  • DSIP Anecdotal

    Discussed for menopausal sleep disruption, which is a real and disabling symptom. DSIP was rejected by the PCAC and has no identified receptor.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Longevity framing extended to menopause by association. No data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Menopausal hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms, and the risk-benefit balance is considerably more favourable for most women starting near the menopause than the 2002 coverage of the Women’s Health Initiative left in public memory. Transdermal oestrogen avoids the first-pass venous thromboembolism risk; a progestogen is needed alongside if the uterus is intact. Vaginal oestrogen for genitourinary symptoms is low-dose, local and separately worth considering.

Two non-hormonal options now exist and came out of exactly the biology on this page: fezolinetant, approved in 2023, and elinzanetant, approved subsequently — neurokinin receptor antagonists that act on the KNDy circuit. They reduce vasomotor symptom frequency and severity with a rapid onset, and they are the option for women who cannot or prefer not to take hormones. SSRIs, SNRIs, gabapentin and cognitive behavioural therapy also have evidence for vasomotor symptoms.

For bone: assessment of fracture risk, adequate vitamin D and calcium, resistance and impact loading, and pharmacotherapy where indicated — bisphosphonates, denosumab, or teriparatide and abaloparatide for anabolic effect at high risk.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Fezolinetant and elinzanetant (neurokinin receptor antagonists) for vasomotor symptoms — small molecules, not peptides, but a direct product of kisspeptin/KNDy neuron biology.

Uterine fibroids

Benign oestrogen- and progesterone-dependent smooth muscle tumours of the uterus. Extremely common, frequently asymptomatic, and when symptomatic the burden is heavy menstrual bleeding, anaemia, pelvic pressure and pain. Because growth is hormone-dependent, suppressing the reproductive axis shrinks them.

3 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    Approved for preoperative treatment of anaemia associated with uterine fibroids. Continuous GnRH agonism shuts the axis down, reducing fibroid volume and correcting anaemia before surgery — sometimes allowing a less invasive operation. Use is time-limited because sustained hypo-oestrogenism causes bone loss, which is what add-back therapy exists to counter.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Upstream of the same axis, and pointing the wrong way — kisspeptin switches the axis on. Included so the direction is not confused.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Adipose tissue is a peripheral source of oestrogen through aromatisation, so weight reduction lowers circulating oestrogen and is associated with fibroid risk in observational data. That is an indirect and unstudied route, not a treatment.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The oral GnRH antagonists with hormonal add-back are the significant recent development, and they are the reason this section is short on peptides: elagolix with estradiol and norethisterone (approved 2020) and relugolix with the same add-back (approved 2021) both reduce heavy menstrual bleeding substantially, are taken orally, and include the add-back in the tablet specifically to prevent the bone loss that limits GnRH agonists. Linzagolix has phase 3 data with and without add-back.

Alongside those: tranexamic acid and NSAIDs for bleeding, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, and procedural options — uterine artery embolisation, myomectomy where fertility is to be preserved, radiofrequency ablation, and hysterectomy as the definitive treatment. Iron replacement for the anaemia is frequently the most immediately useful intervention and is routinely under-done.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Elagolix and relugolix combination products (oral GnRH antagonists with add-back), and linzagolix — the drug class that has changed fibroid management.

Endometriosis

Endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, driving inflammation, adhesions, and pain that is frequently severe and characteristically not proportional to the amount of disease visible at surgery. Affects roughly one in ten women of reproductive age, and the average delay from first symptom to diagnosis is still measured in years.

7 compounds documented
  • Leuprolide Study

    Approved for endometriosis. Continuous GnRH agonism suppresses ovarian oestrogen production, and randomised evidence supports reduction in pelvic pain. Used with hormonal add-back beyond about six months, because sustained hypo-oestrogenism causes bone loss — which is the limitation the newer oral antagonists were designed around.

  • Semaglutide Anecdotal

    An international survey reported that a majority of respondents using a GLP-1 noted improvement in at least one endometriosis symptom and a third reported complete resolution of at least one. Read what that is: a self-selected, self-reported survey with no control group and no blinding, in a condition with fluctuating symptoms and a large placebo response. It is structured anecdote. It is also interesting enough to warrant a trial, and no trial has been run.

  • Tirzepatide Anecdotal

    Appeared in the same survey. Same caveat, and the same absence of controlled data.

  • Kisspeptin-10 Theorized

    Upstream of the axis and pointing the wrong way — kisspeptin switches the reproductive axis on, and endometriosis treatment works by switching it off. Included so the direction is not confused.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed for adhesions and post-surgical recovery. No evidence in endometriosis, and a pro-angiogenic agent in a condition where lesion neovascularisation is part of the pathology is not an obviously neutral choice.

  • TB-500 Anecdotal

    Same adhesion rationale, same absence of evidence, and the same angiogenesis question.

  • KPV Theorized

    Endometriosis has a genuine inflammatory component, and a generic anti-inflammatory is a generic answer to it. No endometriosis data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The oral GnRH antagonists with built-in add-back changed this condition. Elagolix (Orilissa) is approved in the US for endometriosis-associated pain; relugolix with estradiol and norethisterone (Myfembree) is approved for the same; and linzagolix was authorised in the UK in 2025, becoming the second take-at-home option there. They suppress oestrogen in a dose-controlled way, and the add-back is in the tablet specifically to prevent the bone loss that limits GnRH agonists.

Alongside those: combined hormonal contraceptives and progestins including the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, NSAIDs, and laparoscopic excision — where surgeon experience measurably affects outcome. Pain in endometriosis is frequently centrally sensitised, which is why it can persist after lesions are removed and why pelvic floor physiotherapy and multidisciplinary pain management matter rather than being a consolation prize. Endometriosis-associated infertility is a separate problem from the pain and is managed separately.

One programme worth watching, because it is a peptide. ENDO-205 is a first-in-class non-hormonal targeted peptide therapeutic designed to act on endometriotic lesions without suppressing the reproductive axis. Its investigational new drug application was cleared by the FDA, with a phase 1 study in healthy premenopausal women planned for 2026. It has not been tested in a person with endometriosis. It is listed here because a genuine peptide programme in this condition is exactly the thing this library should track — and because it is the standard against which any grey-market claim in this space should be measured.

The rest of the non-hormonal pipeline is largely antibodies and small molecules — anti-IL-11, anti-MMP-7, prostaglandin receptor antagonists, CGRP agents repurposed from migraine. None is approved.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Elagolix, relugolix combination and linzagolix — oral GnRH antagonists with add-back, the drug class that changed endometriosis management.

Interstitial cystitis & pelvic pain

Chronic bladder and pelvic pain with a poorly-defined mechanism and an epithelial-barrier hypothesis that mirrors the gut-permeability argument.

5 compounds documented
  • Desmopressin Study

    Approved for nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria and for primary nocturnal enuresis — a V2-selective vasopressin analogue that concentrates urine. Carries a boxed warning for hyponatraemia on the nocturia formulations, and fluid restriction around dosing is part of the treatment rather than advice attached to it.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Urothelial protection in rodent models; the community use is for the epithelial-barrier rationale.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    The neuropathic component of chronic pelvic pain.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Relevant to recurrent urinary tract infection rather than interstitial cystitis, and elevated cathelicidin is part of the inflammatory picture rather than a treatment for it.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Bladder-directed physiotherapy, pelvic floor treatment, dietary trigger identification, amitriptyline, intravesical instillations, and pentosan polysulfate with its retinal toxicity caveat. Chronic pelvic pain responds to multidisciplinary management more reliably than to any single agent.

Group 08

Cardiovascular & renal

Where the incretins have the best outcome data of anything in this library, and where several other compounds carry a heart-rate or blood-pressure signal that gets less attention than it should.

Cardiovascular risk & heart failure

The endpoint that separates a metabolic drug that lowers a number from one that changes what happens to people.

11 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    SUSTAIN-6 in diabetes and SELECT in obesity without diabetes both reported reduced major adverse cardiovascular events. STEP-HFpEF reported symptom and function improvement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity.

  • Liraglutide Study

    LEADER reported reduced cardiovascular death.

  • Dulaglutide Study

    REWIND, notable for a largely primary-prevention population.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    SUMMIT reported benefit in HFpEF with obesity. SURPASS-CVOT ran against dulaglutide rather than placebo and demonstrated non-inferiority on three-point MACE rather than superiority, with improvements in renal function and all-cause mortality. SURMOUNT-MMO, the morbidity and mortality trial in obesity without diabetes, is not expected until 2027.

  • SS-31 Study

    Human trials in heart failure and in mitochondrial myopathy; the cardiolipin-stabilisation rationale is aimed directly at cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Metabolic and mitochondrial framing; animal data only.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent cardioprotection studies.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Tissue protection in ischaemia-reperfusion models.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    Listed for the opposite reason — the blood-pressure and heart-rate increase is why its development stalled.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Melanocortin agonism can raise blood pressure.

  • Retatrutide Theorized

    Dose-dependent heart-rate increases were visible in phase 2, and no cardiovascular outcome trial has reported.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Blood-pressure control, statins, smoking cessation, and — in heart failure — the four pillars: ACE inhibitor or ARNI, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and SGLT2 inhibitor, each with independent mortality data. Cardiac rehabilitation is under-referred and improves survival. Nothing on this page competes with any of that.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Nesiritide (recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide). Terlipressin is now in this library — see chronic kidney disease.

High blood pressure

The largest single contributor to cardiovascular death worldwide, usually symptomless until it has already done damage. It is also where the biggest peptide story in cardiology sits — a hormone system the heart itself runs, and a drug that works by preventing its destruction.

9 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Lowers blood pressure modestly and reliably, largely through weight loss — a few millimetres of mercury, which is a real effect and not a treatment for hypertension. The class has separate cardiovascular outcome benefit that does not depend on the blood pressure change.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Same, with larger weight loss and correspondingly larger blood pressure reduction.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    The opposite direction, and it matters. Monoamine reuptake inhibition raises heart rate and blood pressure — that is a predictable pharmacological consequence, not an idiosyncratic side effect. Anyone with uncontrolled hypertension is the wrong person for a sympathomimetic weight-loss agent. See adrenal tumours for the rarer hazard.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    Fluid retention is the GH-axis effect people underestimate. Growth hormone causes sodium and water retention through the renal tubule, which is why oedema, joint stiffness and carpal tunnel symptoms are the classic dose-limiting effects. Fluid retention raises blood pressure. Acromegaly — the pathological far end of this axis — causes hypertension in a large proportion of patients.

  • Tesamorelin Theorized

    Same axis, same fluid effect, approved indication elsewhere.

  • Desmopressin Study

    Causes water retention by design, which is the mechanism behind its hyponatraemia risk. In someone with hypertension or heart failure that is a meaningful consideration rather than a footnote.

  • Terlipressin Study

    A vasoconstrictor used in hospital. Listed to keep the vasopressin family straight: this one raises blood pressure deliberately.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent work reports blood-pressure-modulating effects in both directions depending on model. No human data, and nothing here justifies substituting it for treatment that prevents strokes.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed for vascular health. No controlled evidence on blood pressure or outcomes.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The heart is an endocrine organ, and this is the peptide story this site had not yet told. When cardiac chambers stretch, they secrete natriuretic peptides — ANP and BNP — which promote sodium and water excretion, relax blood vessels and oppose the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. It is the body’s own antihypertensive hormone system. Sacubitril/valsartan works by inhibiting neprilysin, the enzyme that degrades those peptides — so rather than administering a peptide, it stops the body destroying the one it already makes. That is a genuinely elegant answer to the delivery and half-life problem that defeats peptide drugs everywhere else on this site, and it is standard therapy in heart failure. BNP is separately used as a blood test, because the hormone level reports on the stretch that produced it.

The treatments are cheap, effective and under-used. ACE inhibitors or ARBs, calcium channel blockers, thiazide-like diuretics, and spironolactone for resistant hypertension — usually in combination, often as a single-pill combination, because most people need more than one drug and adherence falls with pill count. Home blood pressure monitoring is better than clinic readings for both diagnosis and management, and white-coat and masked hypertension are both real.

Two genuinely new mechanisms have arrived. Baxdrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, was approved in May 2026 for hypertension not controlled on existing drugs — in its phase 3 trial it lowered systolic pressure by around 15 mmHg absolute, roughly 9 to 10 mmHg against placebo. Zilebesiran is an siRNA that silences angiotensinogen production in the liver, giving blood pressure control from infrequent dosing. Both target the same aldosterone-angiotensin system the older drugs do, from new angles.

For this readership specifically: anabolic steroid use raises blood pressure, and does so reliably rather than occasionally. Stimulants, high sodium intake, NSAIDs, alcohol, sleep deprivation and untreated sleep apnoea all contribute, and sleep apnoea is the commonest identifiable cause of resistant hypertension. Resistance training does not raise resting blood pressure long-term — it lowers it — and aerobic exercise lowers it more. If a young person has hypertension, secondary causes are worth excluding rather than assuming essential hypertension.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Sacubitril inhibits the enzyme that degrades natriuretic peptides — the peptides are endogenous. Everything else is a small molecule or an siRNA.

Cholesterol & lipids

Abnormal blood lipids, and the causal driver of atherosclerosis — the evidence that lowering LDL lowers events is about as strong as evidence gets in medicine. It is also where this readership takes the largest measurable hit, and where a live trial readout is about to test the site’s favourite discipline.

8 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Improves lipids modestly, mostly via weight loss — lower triglycerides, small LDL reduction. The class has cardiovascular outcome benefit, but it is not a lipid drug and does not replace one.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Larger weight effect, larger triglyceride reduction. Same caveat.

  • 5-Amino-1MQ Theorized

    NNMT inhibition with metabolic claims in rodents. No human lipid data.

  • SLU-PP-332 Theorized

    Exercise-mimetic framing from rodent work. No human data of any kind.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Metabolic framing, association studies in humans, no intervention outcome data.

  • Tesamorelin Study

    Genuinely relevant: it reduces visceral adipose tissue and lowers triglycerides in HIV-associated lipodystrophy, which is an approved indication. It also modestly raises glucose.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH affects lipolysis and lipid profiles, in ways that are dose- and context-dependent and have never been tied to cardiovascular outcomes.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Distinguish carefully: niacin — nicotinic acid, a different molecule — raises HDL substantially and was tested in two large outcome trials, AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE, which showed no benefit and meaningful harm. That is one of the cleanest demonstrations that raising HDL is not the same as helping, and it is worth knowing before reasoning from any NAD-family compound to cardiovascular benefit.

What actually has evidence for this condition

LDL cholesterol is causal, and lower is better across the range tested. Statins are the foundation — cheap, well studied, and subject to more misinformation than almost any drug. Muscle symptoms are real but far less common than attributed; blinded rechallenge trials repeatedly find that most people who report statin intolerance experience the same symptoms on placebo. Beyond statins: ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors — evolocumab and alirocumab, monoclonal antibodies — and inclisiran, an siRNA given twice a year, which solves adherence in a way daily tablets do not.

Lipoprotein(a) is the one to know about, and its answer is arriving now. Lp(a) is genetically determined, largely unaffected by diet, exercise or statins, and independently raises cardiovascular and aortic valve risk. It should be measured once in a lifetime for most adults, and it explains a meaningful fraction of premature heart disease that otherwise looks unexplained. Drugs that lower it dramatically now exist — pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, reduces it by up to 80%, and olpasiran by over 95%.

And here is the discipline this whole site is built on, live and unresolved. No Lp(a)-lowering drug has yet shown it reduces cardiovascular events. The first outcome trial — Lp(a)HORIZON, 8,323 patients — has completed enrolment and has not yet reported. A biomarker central to risk can be cut by 80–95%, and nobody yet knows whether patients benefit. The niacin story above is why that sentence is not pedantry. The answer is expected imminently, and this page will need updating when it lands.

For this readership, the specific harm is not theoretical. Anabolic steroid use — oral 17-alpha-alkylated compounds especially — suppresses HDL profoundly and raises LDL, frequently producing lipid profiles that would prompt urgent treatment in any other context. The effect is dose-related and largely reverses on stopping, but repeated cycles mean repeated exposure. A lipid panel is inexpensive and most people in this space have never had one. Trans fats, excess alcohol and untreated hypothyroidism all worsen lipids; aerobic exercise, weight loss, soluble fibre and replacing saturated with unsaturated fat all improve them.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: PCSK9 inhibitors are antibodies; inclisiran and the Lp(a) agents are nucleic acid therapeutics. No peptide drug treats dyslipidaemia.

Blood clots, polycythaemia & raised haematocrit

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and the thickened blood that predisposes to them. This is the single most practically useful entry on this site for anyone using testosterone, because the commonest serious harm in that population is monitorable with a cheap and routine blood test.

7 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    No direct thrombotic mechanism established. Included because it sits in stacks alongside the compounds that do matter here.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    GH-axis fluid shifts do not raise haematocrit the way androgens do. The concern on this page is androgenic, not somatotropic.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    Directly relevant by design. ARA-290 was engineered from erythropoietin specifically to keep tissue protection without stimulating red cell production — because erythropoietin’s haematopoietic effect is what caused thrombotic harm when erythropoiesis-stimulating agents were pushed to higher haemoglobin targets. That history is set out under leukaemia, and it is the whole reason this compound exists in the form it does.

  • Desmopressin Study

    The opposite direction and an approved use: it improves haemostasis in bleeding disorders and in uraemic platelet dysfunction — see chronic kidney disease. Relevant here for keeping the two directions distinct.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Weight loss reduces venous thromboembolism risk over time. Also relevant acutely: any period of immobility, including after surgery, raises risk, and rapid weight loss is a reason people have surgery.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Pro-angiogenic in animal models. No established effect on coagulation, and no human data either way.

  • Melanotan-2 Anecdotal

    No coagulation mechanism. Listed because it is commonly stacked with androgens, and the androgens are the issue.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The number to know is your haematocrit, and the reason is specific. Testosterone stimulates red cell production. That is a normal, expected pharmacological effect — but taken far enough it produces secondary erythrocytosis: thicker blood, higher viscosity, and increased thrombotic risk. In a large study of men on testosterone therapy, developing a haematocrit of 52% or above was an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism in the first year, with roughly a 35% higher risk than men whose haematocrit stayed normal. Guidance broadly treats a haematocrit above 50% as a reason not to start, and above 54% as a reason to stop or intervene. Be fair about the evidence: no randomised trial has proven the causal chain from testosterone-induced erythrocytosis to clots. The association, the mechanism and the plausibility all point the same way, and the monitoring costs almost nothing.

Supraphysiological doses are not the same as replacement, and the erythrocytosis is dose-related. Anyone using androgens at any dose should have a full blood count checked periodically, and “I feel fine” is not information about haematocrit. Untreated sleep apnoea, smoking and altitude all push it further in the same direction, and sleep apnoea plus testosterone is a particularly common combination.

Recognising a clot matters more than anything else here. Deep vein thrombosis: pain, swelling, warmth or redness usually in one calf or thigh — asymmetry is the signal, and it is routinely mistaken for a strained calf, which in this population is an extremely easy mistake to make. Pulmonary embolism is a medical emergency: sudden breathlessness, chest pain worse on breathing in, coughing blood, light-headedness or collapse. It can occur with no leg symptoms at all. This needs emergency assessment the same hour, not the next day.

Other risk factors worth knowing: long-haul travel and immobility, recent surgery, active cancer, oestrogen-containing contraception and hormone therapy, pregnancy and the postpartum period, obesity, and inherited thrombophilias. Treatment is anticoagulation, now usually with direct oral anticoagulants. An unprovoked clot in a young person warrants investigation — including asking about hormone use, which people frequently do not volunteer and which changes the interpretation entirely. Tell them.

Polycythaemia vera is the other cause — a myeloproliferative blood cancer driven by JAK2 mutation, treated with venesection, aspirin and sometimes cytoreduction. It matters because a raised haematocrit in someone using testosterone has an obvious explanation, and obvious explanations are how other causes get missed. Kidney tumours also secrete erythropoietin — see kidney cancer.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Anticoagulants are small molecules; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are glycoproteins. Desmopressin is the approved peptide here, and it works in the opposite direction.

Atrial fibrillation

An irregular, often rapid heart rhythm, and the commonest sustained arrhythmia. Its importance is out of proportion to how it feels — many people have no symptoms at all, and the reason it matters is stroke.

6 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Indirect but real. Obesity and sleep apnoea are both major drivers of atrial fibrillation, and weight loss reduces the burden of atrial fibrillation and improves the success of rhythm control — shown in dedicated weight-management trials. That makes this one of the better-supported indirect roles for the class.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    Separately approved for obstructive sleep apnoea, which is the other major modifiable driver.

  • Tesofensine Theorized

    Sympathomimetic. Raising catecholaminergic tone is a recognised trigger for atrial fibrillation, as are stimulants generally.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Theorized

    No direct arrhythmic mechanism. The relevance is via fluid retention and blood pressure, and via acromegaly, where sustained GH excess causes cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed for heart health. Note that infusion clinics deliver these preparations quickly enough to cause palpitations, which are then attributed to the compound working.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    No cardiac evidence. Palpitations are a symptom to investigate, not to self-treat.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The stroke risk is the point, and preventing it is what changes lives. Atrial fibrillation causes blood to pool in the left atrium, form clots, and embolise to the brain — and AF-related strokes are typically larger and more disabling than others. Anticoagulation reduces that risk by roughly two-thirds and is decided on risk score rather than on how symptomatic someone is. Direct oral anticoagulants have largely replaced warfarin. Aspirin is not adequate stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, which remains a common and consequential misunderstanding.

Beyond that: rate control or rhythm control, with early rhythm control now favoured more than it once was, and catheter ablation more effective than drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm in suitable patients — particularly in younger people and in AF with heart failure. Left atrial appendage occlusion where anticoagulation is not tolerable.

The modifiable drivers are unusually addressable, and this is where a trainer can genuinely help. Obesity, alcohol, untreated sleep apnoea, hypertension and physical inactivity all drive atrial fibrillation, and structured weight loss and alcohol reduction measurably reduce how much of it people get. Alcohol is a direct and dose-dependent trigger — the association with binge drinking is well enough recognised to have its own name. One nuance worth knowing for athletes: very high-volume endurance training over years is associated with increased atrial fibrillation risk, which is a genuine U-shaped relationship and one of the few places where more exercise is not simply better. Ordinary and even vigorous training is protective.

Worth investigating: thyroid function — see thyroid disease — because hyperthyroidism causes atrial fibrillation and is easily missed. Consumer wearables now detect AF frequently, and an irregular-rhythm notification is worth taking to a doctor for a proper ECG rather than either ignoring or panicking about.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: No peptide is involved. Anticoagulants, rate and rhythm drugs and ablation are the treatments.

Heart failure

The best peptide story on this site, and almost nobody tells it. The failing heart secretes its own peptide hormones as a defence; the blood test used to diagnose the condition measures one of them; and the drug that works does not supply more of the peptide — it stops the body destroying it.

9 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Randomised evidence, and it is good. STEP-HFpEF randomised 529 people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. Symptom and physical-limitation scores improved by 16.6 points against 8.7 on placebo, weight fell 13.3%, C-reactive protein fell 43.5%, and NT-proBNP — the natriuretic peptide used to diagnose and stage the condition — fell too. Obesity-related HFpEF is a phenotype where this class is now genuinely part of the answer.

  • Tirzepatide Study

    The SUMMIT trial tested tirzepatide in HFpEF with obesity and reported reduced risk of worsening heart failure events alongside improved symptom scores. Same phenotype, same direction, consistent picture.

  • SS-31 Study

    Tested here, and it missed. Mitochondrial dysfunction in failing myocardium is one of the better-supported rationales for elamipretide anywhere, and it was taken into human heart failure trials on that basis. It did not deliver on its primary endpoints — which, with the mitochondrial myopathy results, makes this a compound with a genuinely serious mechanism and a consistently disappointing trial record.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Mitochondrial-derived peptide with cardioprotective signalling in rodents. Nothing human.

  • Humanin Theorized

    Same family, cardioprotective in cell and animal models, no human intervention data.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Community cardiac-repair claims extrapolated from rodent soft-tissue models. Its pro-angiogenic action is not obviously desirable in a condition managed partly with anti-remodelling drugs, and nobody promoting it has studied that question.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Note carefully that pathological cardiac hypertrophy is a mechanism of heart failure, not a treatment for it — this is the mass-is-not-function problem in the organ where it matters most.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Myocardial NAD+ depletion is documented in failing hearts. That infused NAD+ corrects it or changes outcomes is not.

  • GHK-Cu Anecdotal

    Remodelling claims from dermal and wound models. Cardiac remodelling is a different process and largely an undesirable one.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Start with the peptide biology, because it explains the drugs. The heart releases atrial and B-type natriuretic peptides when its chambers are stretched — they promote sodium and water excretion and vasodilation, which is the body opposing its own failure. NT-proBNP, a fragment of that system, is the standard blood test for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure.

Then note what happened when the peptide was given as a drug, because it is the whole lesson. Nesiritide is recombinant human BNP. It was approved, widely used, and then tested properly in a large outcomes trial — and it did not improve mortality or rehospitalisation. It faded from practice. What did work was the opposite move: sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, the enzyme that degrades natriuretic peptides, so the body’s own peptides last longer. Combined with valsartan it is a cornerstone of treatment for reduced ejection fraction. Supplying the peptide failed; preventing its destruction succeeded. That is worth holding on to on a site about injecting peptides.

For reduced ejection fraction the four pillars — an ARNI or ACE inhibitor, a beta blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor — are each independently mortality-reducing, and getting all four started and titrated matters more than any single one. Devices (ICD, cardiac resynchronisation) in selected patients. For preserved ejection fraction, SGLT2 inhibitors have the clearest evidence, with the incretins above now added for the obesity phenotype.

Alongside: cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training, which improve symptoms and quality of life; daily weights and fluid awareness; treating iron deficiency, which improves symptoms even without anaemia; and treating atrial fibrillation and sleep apnoea, both of which are common and both of which worsen it. NSAIDs cause fluid retention and decompensation and are a frequent avoidable cause of admission.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Sacubitril/valsartan works on the natriuretic peptide system without being a peptide. Nesiritide was the peptide, and it did not survive its outcomes trial.

POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome)

A sustained rise in heart rate of at least 30 beats per minute within ten minutes of standing, without a drop in blood pressure, together with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. It is a form of dysautonomia rather than a single disease, it disproportionately affects young women, and it is strongly associated with post-viral onset, hypermobility and ME/CFS.

7 compounds documented
  • Desmopressin Study

    The one compound in this library with a randomised result in POTS — and the reason it is not used routinely is on its own page. In a randomised crossover study of 30 patients, a single 0.2 mg oral dose significantly reduced standing heart rate (101.9 against 109.2 beats per minute) and improved symptoms. The mechanism is straightforward: POTS involves relative hypovolaemia, and desmopressin causes water retention. The investigators concluded the safety profile would need examining before routine use — which is the hyponatraemia risk that carries a boxed warning on the nocturia formulations. An acute single-dose result is not a treatment.

  • Terlipressin Theorized

    Same hormone family, opposite receptor emphasis — V1 vasoconstriction rather than V2 water retention. Listed because the vasopressin system is genuinely relevant to orthostatic physiology, not because this hospital intravenous drug has any place here.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Where POTS accompanies ME/CFS, the mitochondrial hypothesis is imported wholesale. Its own trial record argues against expecting much.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Same imported rationale, weaker evidence.

  • NAD⁺ Anecdotal

    Marketed to this population by infusion clinics. Worth noting the confound: an intravenous infusion delivers a litre of saline, and volume expansion is an established POTS treatment in its own right. Someone feeling better after an NAD+ drip may be responding to the fluid, which is available far more cheaply and without the rest of it.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Autoimmune and post-infectious mechanisms are live hypotheses in POTS, including autoantibodies against adrenergic receptors. Pushing immune tone in an unspecified direction is not obviously the answer to that.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Discussed in dysautonomia communities. No evidence.

What actually has evidence for this condition

There is no approved treatment for POTS anywhere, and the evidence base is thin — a systematic review found 21 randomised trials totalling around 750 patients across two decades. Guidance comes from the Heart Rhythm Society and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society rather than from large trials.

The non-drug measures do most of the work and are consistently under-applied: increased fluid and salt intake, compression garments covering the abdomen as well as the legs, avoiding prolonged standing and large carbohydrate-heavy meals, and elevating the head of the bed. Volume expansion is the single most reliable lever.

Where drugs are used: ivabradine has the best randomised evidence, with a crossover trial in hyperadrenergic POTS reporting improved heart rate and some quality-of-life measures, and a more recent trial comparing it against propranolol and placebo. Beta blockers at low dose, fludrocortisone, midodrine and pyridostigmine are all used with weaker support.

Exercise reconditioning has genuine evidence — with one critical caveat. Structured recumbent-to-upright programmes improve POTS outcomes. But POTS frequently coexists with ME/CFS, and where post-exertional malaise is present the ME/CFS rules apply instead: pacing within an exertion envelope rather than incremental progression. Establishing which situation applies before starting an exercise programme is the single most consequential decision in managing this condition, and getting it the wrong way round causes real harm.

Also worth excluding or addressing: iron deficiency, thyroid disease, adrenal insufficiency, medication effects, and the frequently co-occurring hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and mast cell activation syndrome.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: None. No drug is approved for POTS in the US, UK or EU — everything used is off-label.

Chronic kidney disease

Progressive loss of kidney function, usually silent until it is advanced. Two things make this page matter more than its length suggests: the kidney clears most of what gets injected on this site, and the blood test everyone uses to check kidney function is distorted by muscle mass — which is not a small detail for this readership.

11 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Study

    Genuine renal outcome data, which almost nothing here has. The FLOW trial reported reduced risk of kidney disease progression and of kidney and cardiovascular death in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. That is a hard-outcome renal trial, not a surrogate, and it is why this class now appears in kidney guidelines rather than only in diabetes ones.

  • Exenatide Study

    Listed for the contraindication rather than the benefit. Unlike the rest of the class it is renally cleared to a degree that matters, and it is not recommended below an eGFR of 30. Assuming class-wide safety is exactly the error this entry exists to prevent.

  • Insulin & analogues Study

    The most under-appreciated interaction in this section. Insulin is cleared by the kidney, so as kidney function falls insulin requirements fall with it and hypoglycaemia risk rises. Someone whose control was stable for years can start having hypos without changing anything they do. The dose needs revisiting as eGFR declines, and this is a well-recognised clinical trap.

  • Desmopressin Study

    An established use most people do not know about. Uraemia causes platelet dysfunction and a bleeding tendency, and desmopressin improves haemostasis in that setting by releasing von Willebrand factor — used around procedures in people with advanced kidney disease. Note the mirror image of its risk: the same water retention that makes it useful for nocturia is more dangerous in kidney disease, where the ability to excrete a water load is already impaired.

  • Terlipressin Study

    Approved in September 2022 as the first US treatment for hepatorenal syndrome — kidney failure in a structurally normal kidney, driven by splanchnic vasodilation elsewhere. A hospital drug with a boxed warning for serious or fatal respiratory failure.

  • ARA-290 Theorized

    The most mechanistically interesting entry here. It is derived from the region of erythropoietin responsible for tissue protection rather than red cell production — a deliberate attempt to keep erythropoietin’s protective effects without the thrombotic and cardiovascular risks that made high-dose ESAs harmful in kidney disease. That is a serious idea. It has no renal trial, and its developer appears to have wound down.

  • SS-31 Study

    Reached human trials on a mitochondrial-protection rationale, including in renal contexts. Its record across three randomised trials in other indications is of missed primary endpoints.

  • Teriparatide Theorized

    Relevant to CKD mineral and bone disorder, and a caution rather than a suggestion: bone disease in advanced kidney disease is not simply osteoporosis, adynamic bone disease is common, and PTH-analogue therapy in that setting is a specialist decision requiring bone-turnover assessment.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Rodent nephroprotection in toxic-injury models. No human data.

  • MOTS-c Theorized

    Metabolic framing, no renal outcome data.

  • Glutathione Anecdotal

    Marketed for kidney detoxification, which is not a description of anything the kidney does or of anything chronic kidney disease is.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Read this part before anything else on the page. Kidney function is estimated from serum creatinine, and creatinine is a breakdown product of creatine in muscle. High muscle mass raises serum creatinine and therefore lowers estimated GFR without any kidney injury at all, and creatine supplementation does the same. A muscular person can be told they have stage 3 kidney disease on the basis of a number that reflects their physique. The resolution is not to ignore the result — it is to measure cystatin C, which is not muscle-dependent, and to check urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, which is the marker that actually predicts progression. Getting this wrong in either direction is bad: needless alarm on one side, and dismissing real kidney disease as “just my muscle” on the other.

The treatments that work are unglamorous and have transformed the outlook. ACE inhibitors or ARBs; SGLT2 inhibitors, which slow progression in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease alike and are the biggest advance the field has had; finerenone; blood pressure control; glycaemic control; and now the GLP-1 class on the FLOW result. Statins for cardiovascular risk, because people with chronic kidney disease are far more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than to reach dialysis.

There is an approved peptide drug here, and it is an unusually clever one. Etelcalcetide (Parsabiv) treats secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients — it is a synthetic octapeptide built from a D-amino acid backbone, which is precisely why it survives in circulation where an ordinary peptide would be degraded, and it is given intravenously through the dialysis line at the end of a session so it costs the patient no additional injection. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for renal anaemia are the other protein therapeutics in this space, and their history — harm at higher haemoglobin targets — is the cautionary tale behind ARA-290 above.

On nephrotoxins, which is where this readership has real exposure: NSAIDs are the commonest avoidable cause of kidney injury and are taken casually for training soreness. Contrast, aminoglycosides and some proton pump inhibitors matter. Anabolic steroid use is associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, a serious and sometimes irreversible glomerular disease, and this is documented in bodybuilders specifically rather than theorised. High-protein intake is not established as harmful to healthy kidneys, but it is a different question in someone who already has kidney disease.

And the general rule for everything else in this library: reduced kidney function changes the clearance of most injectable compounds, including several on this site. Anyone with meaningful renal impairment is dosing into pharmacokinetics that no vendor protocol accounts for.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Etelcalcetide is an approved peptide for a CKD complication. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are glycoproteins. The drugs that slow progression — SGLT2 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, finerenone — are small molecules.

Group 09

Respiratory & dermatological

Conditions that sit outside the other groups. Three of the four are dermatological, and together they — with rosacea on the LL-37 page — make a point no single page can: cathelicidin is deficient in atopic dermatitis and overexpressed in psoriasis, rosacea and acne. Same peptide, opposite directions, opposite implications for whether administering it could ever make sense.

Asthma

Variable airflow obstruction with airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness. The safety point on this page is the most important one on the site for anyone with this condition, and it is not about efficacy — it is about what happens when someone with asthma has an allergic reaction to an injection.

7 compounds documented
  • Semaglutide Theorized

    The one entry here with a coherent rationale. Obesity-associated asthma is a recognised phenotype — typically neutrophilic rather than eosinophilic, poorly responsive to inhaled corticosteroids, and it improves with weight loss. Observational work suggests GLP-1 agonists reduce exacerbations in people with obesity and asthma. That is a metabolic route to a respiratory benefit, and it is not an asthma drug.

  • Tirzepatide Theorized

    Same phenotype, same reasoning, larger weight effect. It is separately approved for obstructive sleep apnoea, which frequently coexists with asthma and worsens control when untreated.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    A more interesting direction problem than usual. Allergic asthma is Th2-driven and this compound promotes Th1 responses, so the direction is arguably favourable here — unlike in lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. It has never been tested in asthma, and “plausible direction” is where this library draws the line between interesting and useful.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has a genuine role in airway innate defence and is also elevated in chronic airway inflammation, so the direction of the argument is unclear. It is also a mast cell activator, which is not what anyone wants in an airway that already over-reacts.

  • KPV Theorized

    Alpha-MSH fragment with anti-inflammatory action in rodent models, including some airway work. Generic anti-inflammatory action is not the same as controlling type 2 airway inflammation, which is what the drugs below do specifically.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Carried over from the emphysema gene-signature work described under COPD. Airway remodelling in asthma is a different process from alveolar destruction, and there is nothing in asthma.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No mechanism in the airway, no data, and it appears in general wellness discussion.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Start with the safety point, because it is the reason this entry exists. Asthma — particularly poorly controlled asthma — is the single best-established risk factor for fatal anaphylaxis. Any injected substance can cause an allergic reaction; a research-grade vial of uncertain purity, with unknown residual solvents and unverified endotoxin content, carries more of that risk than a licensed medicine. The same reaction that would be frightening in someone else can be fatal in someone with asthma. That is not a reason to be dramatic about it. It is a reason for anyone with asthma to weigh injectables differently from everyone else on this site, and to keep their asthma genuinely well controlled if they are going to use them at all.

On the treatment: SABA-only reliever therapy is no longer recommended, and this change has saved lives. Relying on a short-acting bronchodilator alone treats the bronchoconstriction and leaves the inflammation driving it untouched, and heavy reliever use is a marker of risk rather than of control. Current GINA strategy is built around anti-inflammatory reliever therapy — inhaled corticosteroid-formoterol — across severity steps. Anyone still managing asthma with a blue inhaler and nothing else should be reviewed.

The biologics repeat the pattern this site keeps finding: identify the signalling molecule, then block it with an antibody. Omalizumab against IgE; mepolizumab, reslizumab and depemokimab against IL-5, benralizumab against its receptor; dupilumab against the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit; tezepelumab against TSLP, an epithelial alarmin that sits further upstream. Depemokimab is dosed twice a year. Phenotyping matters — blood eosinophils and FeNO predict response to dupilumab, and where oral corticosteroid sparing is the goal, dupilumab and anti-IL-5 agents have the evidence that tezepelumab does not.

The peptide that should have worked here is worth knowing about. Vasoactive intestinal peptide is an endogenous bronchodilator, present in airway nerves, and it does relax human airways. Inhaled VIP nonetheless failed as a drug — airway peptidases metabolise it during its passage through the respiratory epithelium, so it is destroyed at the point of delivery. Liposomal formulations, stabilised analogues and non-peptide agonists have all been attempted and none has reached clinical use. It is the same lesson as the anticonvulsant neuropeptides under epilepsy: having the right molecule is not the same as being able to get it where it needs to work, intact.

Alongside: inhaler technique, which is wrong in a large fraction of patients and is free to fix; adherence; treating allergic rhinitis, reflux and sleep apnoea; smoking cessation; a written action plan; and identifying occupational triggers. Beta blockers and NSAIDs can both trigger severe attacks in susceptible people.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: The asthma biologics are monoclonal antibodies against cytokines and IgE, not peptide drugs. Inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators are small molecules.

COPD & emphysema

Progressive airflow limitation with destruction of alveolar tissue. Emphysematous lung shows a characteristic gene expression signature: inflammation upregulated, tissue repair — the TGF-beta pathway in particular — downregulated.

4 compounds documented
  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    A 2012 study identified 127 genes associated with emphysema severity and used a connectivity-map search to find compounds predicted to reverse that signature. GHK came out of it, and the prediction held up in vitro: COPD-patient lung fibroblasts that had lost the ability to contract and remodel collagen regained it at 10 nM. A real result in the relevant human cells — and several long steps from treating a person.

  • SS-31 Theorized

    Mitochondrial dysfunction in airway and muscle tissue is one component of the COPD picture. No respiratory trial.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immunomodulation framing, in a disease driven by exacerbations that are frequently infective. No COPD evidence.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin has a real role in airway innate defence, and is also elevated in chronic airway inflammation — which complicates the direction of the argument.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Smoking cessation is the only intervention shown to alter the rate of decline in lung function. Everything else improves symptoms rather than trajectory: long-acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids in the right phenotype, and pulmonary rehabilitation, which improves exercise capacity and quality of life substantially and is badly under-referred. Influenza, pneumococcal and COVID vaccination reduce exacerbations. Long-term oxygen improves survival in the specific group with chronic hypoxaemia. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency is worth excluding in early-onset or non-smoking disease.

Acne vulgaris

Follicular hyperkeratinisation, increased sebum production under androgen and IGF-1 drive, Cutibacterium acnes proliferation and inflammation. The hormonal arm is the one that matters here, because several compounds in this library act directly on it — in the wrong direction.

7 compounds documented
  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    Expected to make acne worse, not better. IGF-1 drives sebocyte lipogenesis and amplifies androgen signalling in the sebaceous gland — it is a substantial part of why high-glycaemic and dairy-heavy diets are associated with acne, and why skin changes feature in acromegaly. Raising IGF-1 systemically is acting on acne pathogenesis from the wrong end.

  • Ipamorelin + CJC-1295 (no DAC) Anecdotal

    GH secretagogues raise IGF-1, which is the same mechanism one step upstream. Acne appearing or worsening on a GH protocol is commonly reported and is exactly what the biology predicts.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Melanocortin receptors sit on sebocytes: MC5R is expressed specifically in differentiating, lipid-laden sebaceous cells and drives sebum production, and MC1/MC5 antagonists reduce sebaceous differentiation. Non-selective melanocortin agonism would therefore be expected to increase sebum. A small report of an alpha-MSH analogue benefiting acne exists, so the direction is not fully settled — but the sebotropic mechanism is established.

  • KPV Theorized

    The anti-inflammatory C-terminal fragment of alpha-MSH, truncated to remove the melanocortin receptor activity above. Topical anti-inflammatory action is the rationale; there is no acne trial.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Relevant to post-inflammatory scarring and remodelling rather than to active acne. Topical, where the evidence is.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin is part of the inflammatory response to C. acnes in the follicle. Elevated rather than deficient here, which makes administering more of it a poor idea — see the rosacea and psoriasis entries for the same pattern.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect and plausible: hyperinsulinaemia raises free androgens and IGF-1 bioactivity, so improving insulin sensitivity should reduce that drive. Relevant mainly where acne accompanies PCOS or insulin resistance. No acne trial.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Topical retinoids are the backbone of acne treatment and are consistently under-used and under-dosed. Benzoyl peroxide addresses the bacterial component without driving resistance, and is used alongside any topical or oral antibiotic for that reason. Combined hormonal contraceptives and spironolactone work well where the pattern is hormonal. Isotretinoin remains the only treatment that produces durable remission and is indicated earlier than it is usually given in severe or scarring acne — scarring is permanent and preventable, and delay is the main avoidable harm.

Dietary evidence is real but modest: high-glycaemic-load diets and skimmed milk are the two with the most support, and both act through the insulin/IGF-1 axis described above.

Atopic dermatitis (eczema)

Barrier dysfunction — frequently filaggrin-related — with a Th2-weighted inflammatory response and a disturbed skin microbiome. It is also, in one specific respect, the mirror image of psoriasis.

6 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    This is the entry that matters, and it runs opposite to every other LL-37 claim in this library. Cathelicidin and beta-defensin expression is significantly decreased in atopic dermatitis lesions compared with psoriasis, and that deficiency is thought to account for the characteristic susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus colonisation and infection. So atopic dermatitis is the one skin condition where the antimicrobial peptide is genuinely missing — which makes it the only place a cathelicidin argument is even facing the right way. It has still never been tested, and the compound is a T-cell autoantigen in psoriasis, so this is a narrow window rather than an endorsement.

  • KPV Theorized

    Alpha-MSH fragments have well-described anti-inflammatory activity in skin, and topical application to inflamed skin is the version that makes pharmacological sense. Preclinical only.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Barrier and matrix effects; the human evidence is cosmetic rather than in dermatitis.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune modulation in a Th2-driven condition, in a compound whose approved uses all involve enhancing immune response. The direction question applies here as in every autoimmune and immune-mediated entry.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Sold on gut-barrier and gut-skin-axis reasoning. No evidence in atopic dermatitis.

  • GLOW Anecdotal

    Marketed for skin generally. Nothing in it has been studied in dermatitis, and injecting a copper peptide for a barrier problem is not the route the evidence uses.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Emollients used generously and continuously are the foundation, and adherence to them does more than most people expect. Topical corticosteroids of appropriate potency for the site — used properly rather than sparingly, since undertreatment prolongs flares — with topical calcineurin inhibitors and topical JAK inhibitors as steroid-sparing options.

Dupilumab and the oral JAK inhibitors have transformed moderate to severe disease in a condition that was poorly served for decades. Treating S. aureus colonisation where it drives flares, addressing sleep disruption, and managing the itch-scratch cycle all matter. Food allergy testing without a clear history is a common and unhelpful detour.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Dupilumab, tralokinumab and lebrikizumab are monoclonal antibodies rather than peptides, but they are the drugs that changed this condition.

Psoriasis

A T-cell-mediated immune-driven disease with a central role for type I interferon and the IL-23/IL-17 axis, producing keratinocyte hyperproliferation. Also the condition where one compound in this library is not a candidate treatment but part of the disease mechanism.

6 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    A specific reason to avoid it, not a reason to try it. LL-37 is overexpressed in psoriatic lesions, where it does two distinct things: it complexes with self-DNA from dying cells and converts it into a potent stimulus for plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7 and TLR9, driving type I interferon and breaking tolerance to self-DNA — and it acts as a T-cell autoantigen in its own right, presented by HLA-C*06:02. Anyone with psoriasis or a family history has a specific reason to avoid administering more of it.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    An immune-enhancing agent in a disease treated by suppressing the IL-23/IL-17 axis. The direction is wrong, and anyone on a biologic should treat this as an interaction question for their dermatologist.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory, which is at least the right direction. Generic rather than psoriasis-specific, and untested.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Matrix remodelling. No psoriasis evidence, and the barrier problem here is secondary to the immune one.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Indirect but genuine: obesity worsens psoriasis severity and reduces response to systemic treatment, and weight loss has been associated with improvement. That is a real relationship acting through the metabolic route rather than a skin-directed one.

  • Epitalon Anecdotal

    Appears in longevity-adjacent skin claims. No data.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The biologics transformed this condition, and the effect sizes are large: anti-TNF, anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents, with the IL-23 class now producing complete or near-complete clearance in a substantial proportion of patients. Before those: topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues, phototherapy, methotrexate, ciclosporin and acitretin, and the oral small molecules apremilast and deucravacitinib.

Psoriasis is a systemic disease, not a skin one. Screening for psoriatic arthritis matters because joint damage is irreversible and early treatment prevents it, and cardiovascular risk is elevated independently of the skin. Smoking, alcohol and obesity all worsen severity and reduce treatment response.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: The anti-TNF, anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 biologics are monoclonal antibodies; apremilast and deucravacitinib are small molecules. None is a peptide, and together they are the reason this condition is now controllable.

Rosacea

Chronic facial redness, flushing, visible vessels and inflammatory papules. It is the most on-the-nose entry in this library for LL-37 — the dermatology literature describes rosacea explicitly as a disease of cathelicidins, and cathelicidin is what LL-37 is.

7 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    This is the mechanism of the disease, not a candidate treatment — and here the case is tighter than in psoriasis or lupus. In rosacea-affected skin the protease kallikrein 5 is elevated, and KLK5 is the enzyme that cleaves the inactive precursor hCAP18 into active LL-37. The result is raised LL-37 and abnormal LL-37 fragments in lesional skin, and those peptides directly drive the vascular changes and inflammatory cell recruitment that are rosacea. In animal work, LL-37 injected into skin produces rosacea-like lesions — and it fails to do so in mast-cell-deficient mice, which is how mast cells were established as essential to the mechanism. Several existing rosacea treatments are thought to work partly by reducing this pathway. Administering LL-37 to someone with rosacea is giving them more of the molecule the disease is made of.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory alpha-MSH fragment, and the direction is at least correct. No rosacea evidence, and the approved topicals below are specific and effective.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Widely used in facial skincare, including by people with rosacea who do not know they have it. Rosacea-prone skin has an impaired barrier and reacts badly to a great many actives, and the practical harm is usually irritation rather than anything mechanistic — stinging and burning from products is one of the most common complaints in this condition.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Flushing is a well-recognised effect of melanocortin agonists, and flushing is the cardinal feature of rosacea. Whether that provokes the condition is unstudied; that it will confuse the picture is not in doubt.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Same family, and facial flushing is among its commonest reported effects.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Promoted for skin healing. No mechanism reaching the vascular and innate-immune processes at work here.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    No direct role. Worth knowing that rapid facial fat loss changes facial appearance and can make underlying redness and vessels more visible — which is a different problem from developing rosacea.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Treatment is subtype-driven, and the subtypes respond to completely different things. For papules and pustules: topical ivermectin — which is among the most effective — metronidazole, azelaic acid, and oral doxycycline, usually at a sub-antimicrobial anti-inflammatory dose rather than as an antibiotic. For persistent redness: topical brimonidine or oxymetazoline, which constrict vessels. For visible vessels and background erythema, vascular laser and intense pulsed light are genuinely the most effective option and are frequently not mentioned. For severe or phymatous disease, isotretinoin and surgical or laser reshaping.

Trigger identification does more than any single product for most people, and triggers are individual: sun — the commonest by far, which makes daily broad-spectrum sunscreen a treatment rather than advice — heat, hot drinks, alcohol especially red wine, spicy food, exercise in heat, stress, and abrupt temperature change. Gentle skincare and barrier repair matter more here than in almost any other skin condition: no scrubs, no astringents, minimal actives, and fragrance-free.

Ocular rosacea is under-diagnosed — gritty, dry, irritated eyes and recurrent styes or blepharitis, sometimes without much facial involvement, and it needs treating because it can affect the cornea. Rosacea is also frequently confused with acne, and the distinction matters: there are no comedones in rosacea, and several acne treatments make rosacea worse.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Ivermectin, metronidazole, azelaic acid, brimonidine and doxycycline are the approved treatments. None is a peptide — and the peptide in this library is on the disease side of the equation.

Vitiligo

Autoimmune destruction of melanocytes, producing sharply defined patches of depigmented skin. It is the one place in this library where the melanocortin mechanism points somewhere legitimate — and where an approved melanocortin peptide has genuinely been studied.

6 compounds documented
  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    The honest position, and it cuts both ways. Melanocortin agonists stimulate melanocytes, and vitiligo is a disease of melanocyte loss — so unlike almost every other use, the mechanism is at least pointed at the problem. But the melanocytes in a vitiligo patch have been destroyed, and stimulating what is not there does nothing. Repigmentation depends on melanocytes migrating in from hair follicles and lesional borders, which is why the treatments below combine stimulation with immune suppression and light. The predictable result of using melanotan with vitiligo is that unaffected skin darkens while the patches do not — increasing the contrast and making the condition look worse. The melanoma surveillance harms apply regardless.

  • PT-141 Theorized

    Melanocortin agonist and a melanotan-II metabolite. Focal hyperpigmentation is a recognised effect; it is not a vitiligo treatment.

  • KPV Theorized

    An alpha-MSH fragment without melanotropic potency — so it lacks the one property that would be relevant here. Its anti-inflammatory action is at least aimed at the right side of an autoimmune disease, and there is no evidence.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune stimulation in an autoimmune disease driven by CD8 T cells attacking melanocytes. The direction problem, and here it is unambiguous.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Skin-remodelling claims. No effect on pigmentation or on the autoimmune process.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Implicated in autoimmunity broadly, as in rosacea, psoriasis and lupus.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Vitiligo is treatable, and the belief that it is not is the main obstacle to people getting help. Repigmentation is achievable, particularly on the face and neck, particularly in recent disease, and particularly in younger people — which makes early treatment worthwhile rather than waiting to see whether it spreads. The hands and feet respond worst.

What works: topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors; narrowband UVB phototherapy, which remains the mainstay for widespread disease; and topical ruxolitinib, a JAK inhibitor cream approved in 2022 — the first drug approved specifically to repigment vitiligo, which changed what can be offered. Combination approaches outperform single treatments, and results take months rather than weeks. Surgical melanocyte transplantation exists for stable, limited disease. Depigmentation of remaining normal skin is an option in extensive disease.

On the melanocortin peptide question, since this library will be asked: afamelanotide — the approved alpha-MSH analogue, licensed for erythropoietic protoporphyria — has been studied in vitiligo in combination with narrowband UVB, with reported improvements in repigmentation over phototherapy alone in generalised disease. It is not approved for vitiligo, it was studied as an implant under specialist supervision with skin monitoring, and it was combined with light rather than used alone. That is the closest the melanocortin family gets to a legitimate dermatological use, and it is not an argument for grey-market melanotan.

Vitiligo clusters with other autoimmune conditions — thyroid disease most commonly, and it is worth screening for — along with type 1 diabetes, Addison’s disease and alopecia areata. Depigmented skin has no protection from ultraviolet and burns readily, so sun protection is medical rather than cosmetic. And the psychological impact is substantial and consistently underestimated by clinicians, particularly in darker skin where contrast is greater.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Topical ruxolitinib is the approved repigmentation treatment. Afamelanotide is an approved melanocortin peptide — for a different condition — studied here only as an adjunct to phototherapy.

Urticaria & mast cell activation

Hives — itchy weals that come and go, sometimes with deeper swelling. Relevant to anyone injecting anything, because the cell at the centre of it is the same one that mediates allergic reactions, and because a recurring skin reaction to an injection needs interpreting correctly.

6 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    A direct mast cell activator, which is how it produces the skin inflammation described under rosacea — LL-37 fails to generate those lesions in mast-cell-deficient animals. In a condition defined by inappropriate mast cell degranulation, that is the wrong molecule to add.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory alpha-MSH fragment; alpha-MSH has documented effects on mast cells and cutaneous inflammation, so the direction is defensible. No human urticaria evidence, and antihistamines are cheap, safe and effective.

  • KLOW Theorized

    Blends are worth naming here for a practical reason: if you react to a multi-component product, you cannot tell which component you reacted to, which makes future avoidance guesswork.

  • BPC-157 Theorized

    Injection site reactions are common with many injectables and are usually local irritation rather than allergy. The distinction that matters is local versus systemic — a weal at the site is one thing; hives elsewhere on the body, lip or tongue swelling, or wheeze is another entirely, and means stop and seek help. See injection safety.

  • Melanotan-2 Theorized

    Flushing and localised reactions are commonly reported and commonly dismissed. Persistent or spreading reactions deserve more attention than they usually get.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Injection site reactions occur and are usually mild. Genuine hypersensitivity to any injectable is possible and is a reason to stop and take advice rather than push through.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Most chronic urticaria is not an allergy, and this is the most useful thing to know about it. Chronic spontaneous urticaria — hives on most days for more than six weeks — is usually autoimmune or idiopathic rather than triggered by a food or product, and extensive allergy testing and elimination diets in this situation typically find nothing and cause considerable wasted effort. Acute urticaria after a specific exposure is a different matter and is worth investigating.

Treatment is straightforward and under-dosed. Second-generation non-sedating antihistamines are first-line, and guidelines support increasing to up to four times the standard dose where the standard dose is insufficient — which is safe, well established, and frequently not done, leaving people convinced antihistamines do not work for them. Beyond that: omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, which is highly effective in refractory chronic urticaria; ciclosporin; and newer agents. Sedating antihistamines are not recommended.

Know the difference between urticaria and anaphylaxis. Hives alone, with no breathing difficulty, throat or tongue swelling, vomiting or faintness, is not anaphylaxis — but hives are frequently its first sign. Angio-oedema without weals, particularly involving the lips, tongue or throat, is a separate concern: ACE inhibitors cause it, sometimes years into treatment, and hereditary angio-oedema is a rare but important cause that does not respond to adrenaline or antihistamines and has its own specific treatments. See injection safety for the emergency picture.

Physical urticarias are worth recognising because they explain a great deal: dermographism, cold urticaria, and cholinergic urticaria — triggered by a rise in core temperature, so by exercise, hot showers and stress, which is common in fit young people and routinely mistaken for an allergy to something. Exercise-induced anaphylaxis, sometimes only when a particular food has been eaten beforehand, is rare but real and is a genuine reason to seek assessment rather than experiment.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Antihistamines and omalizumab, an antibody. No peptide treats urticaria — and LL-37 activates the cell that causes it.

Hidradenitis suppurativa

Recurrent painful nodules, abscesses and tunnels in the armpits, groin, under the breasts and between the buttocks. It is far commoner than its profile suggests, it is not an infection, and it is not caused by poor hygiene — and it is misdiagnosed as recurrent boils for years on average.

6 compounds documented
  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    Reached for because the lesions look like wounds that will not heal. They are not failing to heal — they are being continuously regenerated by an immune process, which is why repair-focused approaches do not work and why immunological treatment does. Injecting into or near actively inflamed, frequently colonised lesions is also a poor idea.

  • LL-37 Theorized

    Cathelicidin is dysregulated in hidradenitis lesional skin, which places it alongside rosacea and psoriasis as a condition where this peptide is part of the pathology.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in models. The direction is right; the effective treatments target specific cytokines rather than inflammation generally.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    Genuinely relevant, though not a treatment. Obesity and smoking are the two strongest modifiable factors in hidradenitis, and weight loss reduces severity and friction in the affected skin folds. Observational reports suggest improvement in people started on GLP-1 agonists for other reasons. Unrandomised, and worth pursuing alongside proper treatment rather than instead of it.

  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Scarring and tunnel formation are prominent, which is where the interest comes from. Established tunnels are structural and are addressed surgically, not by topical remodelling.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Immune stimulation in an inflammatory skin disease treated with immune suppression. The direction problem.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The delay to diagnosis in hidradenitis averages years, and that delay causes permanent scarring. People are treated for recurrent boils with repeated antibiotic courses and incision and drainage, which relieve the immediate lesion and do nothing about the disease. Recurrent painful lumps in the armpits, groin or under the breasts — particularly in the same places, particularly with blackhead-like double comedones or any tunnelling — is hidradenitis until proven otherwise and warrants dermatology referral.

Effective treatment exists and has expanded considerably. Topical clindamycin and antiseptic washes for mild disease; oral tetracyclines; the clindamycin-rifampicin combination; hormonal treatment including spironolactone and combined oral contraceptives in women; and metformin. For moderate to severe disease, biologics: adalimumab was the first approved, and secukinumab and bimekizumab have followed — targeting TNF and IL-17 respectively. Surgery has a definite role for established tunnels and scarring, and deroofing is often preferable to wide excision. Laser hair removal helps in some sites.

Two things worth correcting directly, because patients are frequently told otherwise. It is not caused by being unclean — and being told to wash more is both wrong and humiliating. And it is not primarily an infection — lesions can become secondarily infected, but antibiotics in this disease work largely as anti-inflammatories, which is why the disease returns when they stop.

Smoking cessation and weight management genuinely change the course, and are worth pursuing with support rather than instruction. Pain is often severe and under-treated. Associated conditions worth knowing about include metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis — and the psychological burden, driven by pain, odour, drainage and location, is among the highest of any dermatological condition.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab are approved biologics — antibodies, not peptides. No peptide drug treats it.

Allergic rhinitis & allergy

Sneezing, congestion, itch and runny nose from an IgE-mediated response to inhaled allergens. Common, undertreated, and relevant here mainly because atopy is the background against which injectable reactions happen.

5 compounds documented
  • LL-37 Theorized

    Present in airway secretions and part of innate defence, and also a mast cell activator. As in urticaria, that is the wrong direction in an allergic condition.

  • KPV Theorized

    Anti-inflammatory in models, including some mucosal work. No human allergic rhinitis evidence, and the approved treatments are cheap and highly effective.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Allergic disease is a Th2-skewed condition and this compound promotes Th1 responses, so the direction is arguably favourable — the same argument set out under asthma. It has never been tested, and “plausible direction” is not evidence.

  • Semaglutide Theorized

    No role. Included because untreated rhinitis worsens asthma control and sleep-disordered breathing, both of which this class does affect.

  • BPC-157 Anecdotal

    No mechanism, no evidence, and nasal symptoms lasting more than a few weeks on one side only need examining rather than treating.

What actually has evidence for this condition

The single commonest reason treatment fails is technique and timing, not the drug. Intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective single treatment for persistent allergic rhinitis — substantially better than antihistamines for congestion — but they need daily regular use for one to two weeks before full effect, not occasional use when symptoms flare, and they need correct technique: aim outward toward the ear on the same side, not at the septum, and do not sniff hard. Nosebleeds and septal irritation usually come from spraying at the septum.

Beyond that: non-sedating oral antihistamines; intranasal antihistamines; saline irrigation, which is cheap and genuinely helpful; and combination nasal sprays for more severe disease. Decongestant nasal sprays cause rebound congestion after about a week of continuous use and are a common cause of intractable blockage. Allergen immunotherapy — subcutaneous or sublingual — is the only treatment that modifies the disease rather than suppressing symptoms, works for defined allergens, and can produce lasting benefit after a course.

Two connections worth making. The upper and lower airway behave as one — treating rhinitis improves asthma control, and asthma is worth looking for in anyone with persistent rhinitis. And atopy is the setting in which most serious injectable hypersensitivity occurs: people with allergic disease are more likely to react to injected substances, and people with asthma are at higher risk of a fatal outcome if they do. That is set out under injection safety, and it is the reason this modest condition appears in a library about injectables at all.

Unilateral symptoms, blood-stained discharge, facial pain, loss of smell that does not recover, or symptoms unresponsive to proper treatment warrant examination rather than escalation of sprays — nasal polyps, structural problems and rarer causes all present this way.

Approved peptide drugs for this condition that are not in this library: Intranasal corticosteroids, antihistamines and allergen immunotherapy. Omalizumab is an antibody. No peptide is involved.

Hair loss (androgenetic alopecia)

Follicular miniaturisation driven by dihydrotestosterone in genetically susceptible follicles, with perifollicular microinflammation and reduced dermal papilla signalling alongside it.

5 compounds documented
  • GHK-Cu Theorized

    Reported to stimulate dermal papilla cell proliferation, with some 5-alpha reductase inhibitory activity in vitro. Small studies and mechanism only. Copper peptides are a large commercial hair-care category, which is a reason for more scepticism about the claims rather than less.

  • IGF-1 LR3 Theorized

    IGF-1 signalling is genuinely involved in the follicular growth phase. Using an unregulated systemic IGF-1 analogue for hair is a poor trade against the oncology caution.

  • GLOW Anecdotal

    Discussed for skin and hair together on the strength of its GHK-Cu content — the component whose evidence is topical.

  • Melanotan-2 Anecdotal

    Affects hair and skin pigmentation, not hair density. Included because the two get conflated.

  • Thymosin Alpha-1 Theorized

    Raised in the context of alopecia areata, which is an autoimmune condition and a different disease from androgenetic alopecia. No evidence in either.

What actually has evidence for this condition

Topical minoxidil and oral finasteride have the randomised evidence and the effect sizes, and everything on this page sits well below them. Oral minoxidil at low dose has growing evidence. Low-level laser therapy and microneedling have supporting data. Dutasteride is used off-label with a larger effect than finasteride and a correspondingly larger side-effect discussion. Hair transplantation remains the only intervention that puts follicles where there are none.

Two practical points: assess against photographs rather than memory, because self-assessment over a six-to-twelve month timescale is unreliable; and exclude the treatable causes — iron deficiency, thyroid disease, telogen effluvium after illness or stress — before assuming a pattern-loss diagnosis.

A note on sources

Condition-specific peptide content circulates almost entirely through clinic and supplier marketing pages, which have a commercial interest in the answer. Those are not treated as evidence here. Where an entry is tagged Study, it points to trial or regulatory evidence named in the linked monograph. Where it is tagged Theorized, the underlying work is mechanistic, in vitro or animal. Where it is tagged Anecdotal, it means people discuss it and nothing more than that.

Several conditions here are treated by approved prescription peptide drugs, and those now have monographs of their own: teriparatide for osteoporosis, teduglutide for short bowel syndrome, linaclotide for constipation-predominant IBS, octreotide for acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours, leuprolide for prostate cancer and endometriosis, desmopressin for diabetes insipidus and enuresis, terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome, oxytocin for postpartum haemorrhage, and enfuvirtide for HIV. Those pages publish no grey-market dosing. They are there because the peptide class solved several of these problems decades ago through the ordinary regulatory route, and a library that only listed research compounds would be hiding that.

A handful of approved peptide drugs are still named only in passing, because they add little this library does not already cover: abaloparatide, plecanatide, lanreotide, pasireotide, goserelin, triptorelin, degarelix, relugolix, cetrorelix, ganirelix, carbetocin, nesiritide and lutetium-177 dotatate.